Cited by 679Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyObesity, Physical Activity, DietEconomics of Agriculture and Food Markets

In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax

Open access
Colchero, M. Arantxa, Rivera-Dommarco, Juan, Popkin, Barry M., Ng, Shu Wen·2017·Health Affairs

Abstract

Mexico implemented a 1 peso per liter excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverages on January 1, 2014, and a previous study found a 6 percent reduction in purchases of taxed beverages in 2014. In this study we estimated changes in beverage purchases for 2014 and 2015. We used store purchase data for 6,645 households from January 2012 to December 2015. Changes in purchases of taxed and untaxed beverages in the study period were estimated using two models, which compared 2014 and 2015 purchases with predicted (counterfactual) purchases based on trends in 2012-13. Purchases of taxed beverages decreased 5.5 percent in 2014 and 9.7 percent in 2015, yielding an average reduction of 7.6 percent over the study period. Households at the lowest socioeconomic level had the largest decreases in purchases of taxed beverages in both years. Purchases of untaxed beverage increased 2.1 percent in the study period. Findings from Mexico may encourage other countries to use fiscal policies to reduce consumption of unhealthy beverages along with other interventions to reduce the burden of chronic disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Voluntary agreements with industry to reduce sugar consumption have failed.

    “Voluntary agreements with industry to reduce sugar consumption have failed .100- 102”

    From Ending the neglect of global oral health: time for radical action. (2019) · cites this paper as [102]

    The Methods discussion mentions partial regulation of marketing to children and possible post-tax industry campaigns, while the References list a study on pitfalls of advertising self-regulation. Neither passage says that voluntary agreements with industry to reduce sugar consumption failed; searches for that claim and for voluntary industry self-regulation found no such finding in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [10]World Health Organization Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children Geneva 2015 [November 2016]. Available from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guidelines/sugars_intake/en/ 25905159
  2. [16]Guthrie A Esterl Mike Despite Tax, Mexico Soda Sales Pop --- Two years after a levy of about 10% sparked a decline, the numbers are rising once again Wall Street Journal 2016 5 4
  3. [18]Cherukupalli R Growth rates and aggregates: bringing data to the soda wars The Lancet Global Health Blog [Internet] 2016 Available from: http://globalhealth.thelancet.com/2016/06/10/growth-rates-and-aggregates-bringing-data-soda-wars

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colchero, M. A., Rivera-Dommarco, J., Popkin, B. M., & Ng, S. W.
Affiliations
  • Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (MX)
  • Juan Rivera-Dommarco is director of the Center for Research on Nutrition and Health, National Institute of Public Health.
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Ng, Shu Wen
Venue
Health Affairs
Published
2017-03
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
564-571
ISSN
  • 0278-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 1544-5208
OpenAlex
W2589698749
Cited by
679
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 74 · 2021: 98 · 2020: 95 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 86 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 1
FWCI
152.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Affairs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK108148)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD050924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economics of Agriculture and Food Markets
Keywords
sugar-sweetened beverage tax, excise tax, consumer response, beverage purchases, fiscal policy, socioeconomic disparities, Mexico, chronic disease prevention
MeSH terms
Sugars, Beverages, Commerce, Consumer Behavior, Family Characteristics, Humans, Mexico, Sweetening Agents, Taxes, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review