Cited by 16Ovarian function and disordersProbiotics and Fermented FoodsGut microbiota and health

Changes in Hormonal Profile and Body Mass Index in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome After Probiotic Intake: A 12-Week Placebo-Controlled and Randomized Clinical Study

Open access
Szydłowska, Iwona, Nawrocka-Rutkowska, Jolanta, Gorzko, Amalia, Pawłowski, Hubert, Starczewski, Andrzej, Szczuko, Małgorzata·2025·Nutrients

Abstract

Introduction: The beneficial effect of probiotics on the improvement of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism, as well as body mass index (BMI), has been demonstrated in various patient groups. We aimed to investigate the effect of a multi-strain probiotic on the hormonal balance of women with PCOS. Ethical approval was obtained from the Bioethical Committee. Methods: The study was designed as a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study. The probiotic SanProbi® Barrier capsules, which contain a unique composition of nine probiotic bacteria strains (Lactobacillus and Biffidobacterium), were used in the study. The mean age of the study participants was a mean of 28.42 ± 5.62 years. A total of 50 women with PCOS, diagnosed based on Rotterdam ESHRE criteria, were included in the study. Among them, 25 women were randomized to a placebo group, and 25 to a probiotic group. Results: A comparison of changes in individual hormone levels between groups confirmed statistically significant differences for TSH, androstenedione, SHBG, and BMI. In the case of LH, the statistical significance of the difference in delta change in the probiotic group was demonstrated with the use of a one-tailed test. Conclusions: Probiotic supplementation may serve as an alternative supporting treatment, especially in the phenotype of women with a high FAI index. Probiotic therapy is also effective in reducing BMI in overweight women with PCOS

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu17030405

Cites

43 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women with PCOS exhibit a higher prevalence of central obesity and an increased risk of metabolic disturbances.

    “Women diagnosed with PCOS exhibit a higher prevalence of central obesity and an increased risk of metabolic disturbances [27,28].”

    From Visceral and Dysfunctional Adiposity Indices as Predictors of Insulin Resistance and Metabolic Syndrome in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study (2025) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Introduction (page not provided) links PCOS with overweight, obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic dysfunction, supporting the metabolic-risk portion of the claim. It does not state that women with PCOS have a higher prevalence of central obesity specifically; the study reports BMI rather than a measure of central obesity. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [27]Weir C.B. Jan A. BMI Classification Percentile And Cut Off Points StatPearls [Internet] StatPearls Publishing Treasure Island, FL, USA 2024 Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541070/ (accessed on 1 November 2024) 31082114
  2. [33]Szydłowska I. Marciniak A. Brodowska A. Loj B. Ciećwież S. Skonieczna-Żydecka K. Palma J. Łoniewski I. Stachowska E. Effects of probiotics supplementation on the hormone and body mass index in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women using the standardized diet. A 5-week double-blind, placebo-controlled, and randomized clinical study Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2021 25 3859 3867 10.26355/eurrev_202105_25953 34109594 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Szydłowska, I., Nawrocka-Rutkowska, J., Gorzko, A., Pawłowski, H., Starczewski, A., & Szczuko, M.
Affiliations
  • Pomeranian Medical University (PL)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Gorzko, Amalia
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-01-23
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
405
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406766045
Cited by
16
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5
FWCI
14.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pomorski Uniwersytet Medyczny W Szczecinie
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, probiotics, multi-strain probiotics, hormonal profile, body mass index, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, androstenedione, sex hormone-binding globulin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, free androgen index, overweight women
MeSH terms
Adult, Androstenedione, Double-Blind Method, Female, Hormones, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin, Thyrotropin, Body Mass Index, Probiotics, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review