Cited by 99Nutrition and Health StudiesNutritional Studies and DietConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Impact of Frequency of Multi-Vitamin/Multi-Mineral Supplement Intake on Nutritional Adequacy and Nutrient Deficiencies in U.S. Adults

Open access
Blumberg, Jeffrey, Frei, Balz, Fulgoni, Victor, Weaver, Connie, Zeisel, Steven·2017·Nutrients

Abstract

Although >50% of U.S. adults use dietary supplements, little information is available on the impact of supplement use frequency on nutrient intakes and deficiencies. Based on nationally representative data in 10,698 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) 2009 to 2012, assessments were made of intakes from food alone versus food plus multi-vitamin/multi-mineral supplements (MVMS) of 17 nutrients with an Estimated Average Requirement (EAR) and a Tolerable Upper Intake Level (UL), and of the status of five nutrients with recognized biomarkers of deficiency. Compared to food alone, MVMS use at any frequency was associated with a lower prevalence of inadequacy (p < 0.01) for 15/17 nutrients examined and an increased prevalence of intakes >UL for 7 nutrients, but the latter was ≤4% for any nutrient. Except for calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D, most frequent MVMS use (≥21 days/30 days) virtually eliminated inadequacies of the nutrients examined, and was associated with significantly lower odds ratios of deficiency for the examined nutrient biomarkers except for iron. In conclusion, among U.S. adults, MVMS use is associated with decreased micronutrient inadequacies, intakes slightly exceeding the UL for a few nutrients, and a lower risk of nutrient deficiencies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu9080849

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adults, dietary supplementation with a complete multivitamin has been associated with a reduced risk of micronutrient deficiency, particularly for those with obesity.

    “In adults, dietary supplementation with a complete multivitamin has been associated with a reduced risk of micronutrient deficiency, particularly for those with obesity [87,88].”

    From Nutritional considerations with antiobesity medications (2024) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Discussion and Conclusions report that multivitamin/multimineral supplement use was associated with a lower risk of deficiencies in vitamins B6, B12, C, and D among U.S. adults. The paper does not report a finding specific to adults with obesity, so it does not support the claim that the association is particularly strong for them. Its Methods define the supplements by their nutrient content, rather than as a 'complete multivitamin.' (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [19]Otten J.J. Hellwig J.P. Meyers L.D. Dietary Reference Intakes, the Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements National Academy Press Washington, DC, USA 2006
  2. [20]Institute of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes for Calcium and Vitamin D National Academy Press Washington, DC, USA 2011
  3. [27]Moshfegh A.J. Rhodes D.G. Bare D.J. Murayi T. Clemens J.C. Rumpler W.V. Paul D.R. Sebastian R.S. Kuczynski K.J. Ingwersen L.A. The USDA AMPM reduces bias in collection of energy intake Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008 88 324 332 18689367

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blumberg, J., Frei, B., Fulgoni, V., Weaver, C., & Zeisel, S.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Oregon State University (US)
  • Nutrition Impact, LLC, Battle Creek, MI 49014, USA
  • Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
  • Nutrition Research Institute, Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Kannapolis, NC 28081, USA
Corresponding author
Blumberg, Jeffrey
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-08-09
Volume
9
Issue
8
Pages
849
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2745174215
Cited by
99
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
Campaign for Essential Nutrients (Bayer, DSM, Pharmavite) (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
supplement use frequency, nutritional adequacy, nutritional deficiency, micronutrient intake, dietary supplements, tolerable upper intake level, iron deficiency, calcium, magnesium, vitamin D, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Avitaminosis, Female, Humans, Male, Minerals, Nutrition Surveys, Nutritional Status, United States, Vitamins, Micronutrients, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review