Cited by 53Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorNutritional Studies and DietConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Consumption of a High Quantity and a Wide Variety of Vegetables Are Predicted by Different Food Choice Motives in Older Adults from France, Italy and the UK

Open access
Appleton, Katherine, Dinnella, Caterina, Spinelli, Sara, Morizet, David, Saulais, Laure, Hemingway, Ann, Monteleone, Erminio, Depezay, Laurence +2 more·2017·Nutrients

Abstract

Background: Consumption of a high quantity and wide variety of vegetables is currently recommended for health. Dietary variety can be low, however, particularly for older adults. This study investigated the affective factors associated with the quantity and variety of vegetables consumed by older adults in France, Italy and the UK. Methods: Adults aged 65 years plus completed questionnaires on self-reported vegetable intake (quantity and variety), liking for vegetables, attitudes towards intake, and demographic variables. Results: In 497 older adults (France, n = 187, Italy, n = 152, UK, n = 158), higher quantities of vegetables consumed were associated with a higher age, affluence score and liking for vegetables, and a lower importance in consumption of familiarity (smallest β = 0.11, p = 0.03). Greater variety was associated with a higher liking and importance of health benefits, and a lower importance of familiarity (smallest β = −0.11, p < 0.01). Higher quantity and variety combined (quantity × variety) was associated with a higher age, liking and importance of health benefits, and a lower importance of familiarity (smallest β = 0.14, p = 0.02). Country-specific effects were also found (smallest β = 0.20, p < 0.01). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a role for liking and a lower concern for eating familiar foods in vegetable consumption, and a particular role for concern for health benefits in the consumption of a greater variety of vegetables.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu9090923

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 87 · Cited by 53

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [24]World Health Organization Fruit and Vegetables for Health Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Workshop, 1–3 September 2004, Kobe, Japan WHO Geneva, Switzerland 2005

Authors
Appleton, K., Dinnella, C., Spinelli, S., Morizet, D., Saulais, L., Hemingway, A., Monteleone, E., Depezay, L., Perez-Cueto, F., & Hartwell, H.
Affiliations
  • Bournemouth University (GB)
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Food and Behaviours Department, Bonduelle, 59653 Villeneuve D’Ascq, France
  • Institut Paul Bocuse (FR)
  • Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
Corresponding author
Appleton, Katherine
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2017-08-23
Volume
9
Issue
9
Pages
923
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2749120685
Cited by
53
References
87
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
EU Framework 7 (PIAP-GA-2013-612326)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
vegetable consumption, dietary diversity, older adults, food choice motives, vegetable liking, familiarity, health benefits, food attitudes, cross-national comparison, France, Italy, United Kingdom
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Healthy Aging, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, France, United Kingdom, Humans, Italy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Motivation, Nutritional Status, Nutritive Value, Vegetables, Health Behavior, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review