Consumption of a High Quantity and a Wide Variety of Vegetables Are Predicted by Different Food Choice Motives in Older Adults from France, Italy and the UK
Open accessAbstract
Background: Consumption of a high quantity and wide variety of vegetables is currently recommended for health. Dietary variety can be low, however, particularly for older adults. This study investigated the affective factors associated with the quantity and variety of vegetables consumed by older adults in France, Italy and the UK. Methods: Adults aged 65 years plus completed questionnaires on self-reported vegetable intake (quantity and variety), liking for vegetables, attitudes towards intake, and demographic variables. Results: In 497 older adults (France, n = 187, Italy, n = 152, UK, n = 158), higher quantities of vegetables consumed were associated with a higher age, affluence score and liking for vegetables, and a lower importance in consumption of familiarity (smallest β = 0.11, p = 0.03). Greater variety was associated with a higher liking and importance of health benefits, and a lower importance of familiarity (smallest β = −0.11, p < 0.01). Higher quantity and variety combined (quantity × variety) was associated with a higher age, liking and importance of health benefits, and a lower importance of familiarity (smallest β = 0.14, p = 0.02). Country-specific effects were also found (smallest β = 0.20, p < 0.01). Conclusions: These findings demonstrate a role for liking and a lower concern for eating familiar foods in vegetable consumption, and a particular role for concern for health benefits in the consumption of a greater variety of vegetables.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An increased emphasis on the motives of health, natural content and weight control has been found to associate with healthy eating behaviour.
“An increased emphasis on the motives of health, natural content and weight control has been found to associate with healthy eating behaviour [19,20,21].”
From The association of demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults (2020) · cites this paper as [21]
Previous studies have related natural content, ecological welfare and weight control to healthy eating behaviour.
“Previous studies have related these FCMs to healthy eating behaviour [19,20,21].”
From The association of demographic characteristics and food choice motives with the consumption of functional foods in emerging adults (2020) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 87 · Cited by 53
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [24]World Health Organization Fruit and Vegetables for Health Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Workshop, 1–3 September 2004, Kobe, Japan WHO Geneva, Switzerland 2005
- Authors
- Appleton, K., Dinnella, C., Spinelli, S., Morizet, D., Saulais, L., Hemingway, A., Monteleone, E., Depezay, L., Perez-Cueto, F., & Hartwell, H.
- Affiliations
- Bournemouth University (GB)
- University of Florence (IT)
- Food and Behaviours Department, Bonduelle, 59653 Villeneuve D’Ascq, France
- Institut Paul Bocuse (FR)
- Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
- Corresponding author
- Appleton, Katherine
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nutrients
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2017-08-23
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 923
- ISSN
- 2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5622683
- OpenAlex
- W2749120685
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 87
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 3.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- EU Framework 7 (PIAP-GA-2013-612326)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Keywords
- vegetable consumption, dietary diversity, older adults, food choice motives, vegetable liking, familiarity, health benefits, food attitudes, cross-national comparison, France, Italy, United Kingdom
- MeSH terms
- Diet, Healthy, Healthy Aging, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, France, United Kingdom, Humans, Italy, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Motivation, Nutritional Status, Nutritive Value, Vegetables, Health Behavior, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review