Cited by 93Parasites and Host InteractionsHelminth infection and controlParasite Biology and Host Interactions

Parasitic Nematode Immunomodulatory Strategies: Recent Advances and Perspectives

Open access
Cooper, Dustin, Eleftherianos, Ioannis·2016·Pathogens

Abstract

More than half of the described species of the phylum Nematoda are considered parasitic, making them one of the most successful groups of parasites. Nematodes are capable of inhabiting a wide variety of niches. A vast array of vertebrate animals, insects, and plants are all identified as potential hosts for nematode parasitization. To invade these hosts successfully, parasitic nematodes must be able to protect themselves from the efficiency and potency of the host immune system. Innate immunity comprises the first wave of the host immune response, and in vertebrate animals it leads to the induction of the adaptive immune response. Nematodes have evolved elegant strategies that allow them to evade, suppress, or modulate host immune responses in order to persist and spread in the host. Nematode immunomodulation involves the secretion of molecules that are capable of suppressing various aspects of the host immune response in order to promote nematode invasion. Immunomodulatory mechanisms can be identified in parasitic nematodes infecting insects, plants, and mammals and vary greatly in the specific tactics by which the parasites modify the host immune response. Nematode-derived immunomodulatory effects have also been shown to affect, negatively or positively, the outcome of some concurrent diseases suffered by the host. Understanding nematode immunomodulatory actions will potentially reveal novel targets that will in turn lead to the development of effective means for the control of destructive nematode parasites.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/pathogens5030058

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The production of cystatins by some filarial parasites such as Onchocerca volvulus and Acanthocheilonema viteae inhibits cysteine proteases and induces IL-10 production.

    “For example, the production of the cystatins by some filarial parasites such as Onchocerca volvulus and Acanthocheilonema viteae leads to the inhibition of the cysteine protease group (i.e., legumains and cathepsin L and S) and induces the production of anti-inflammatory interleukin (i.e., IL-10) [21,22].”

    From Emergent and Neglected Equine Filariosis in Egypt: Species Diversity and Host Immune Response (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    Section 4 (page unavailable) says nematode cystatins inhibit legumains and cathepsins L and S and enhance IL-10 production. It specifically reports IL-10 upregulation by an Acanthocheilonema viteae cystatin, but does not identify Onchocerca volvulus as a cystatin producer; its discussion of O. volvulus concerns miRNAs instead. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Immunomodulatory mediators such as ES-62, cystatins, legumains and cathepsin L and S have an immunomodulatory effect to enhance production of anti-inflammatory IL10.

    “They have an immunomodulatory effect to enhance the production of anti-inflammatory IL10 [17,22].”

    From Emergent and Neglected Equine Filariosis in Egypt: Species Diversity and Host Immune Response (2022) · cites this paper as [22]

    Section 4 says nematode-secreted cystatins strongly enhance production of anti-inflammatory IL-10. It describes legumains and cathepsins L and S as targets inhibited by cystatins, not as mediators that enhance IL-10. It describes ES-62 as immunomodulatory but does not link it to increased IL-10 production. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, D., & Eleftherianos, I.
Affiliations
George Washington University (US)
Corresponding author
Eleftherianos, Ioannis
Venue
Pathogens
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-09-14
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
58
ISSN
2076-0817 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2520320561
Cited by
92
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pathogens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1R01AI110675-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Parasitology › Parasites and Host Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
Keywords
parasitic nematodes, immunomodulation, immune evasion, innate immunity, adaptive immunity, host-parasite interactions, immunosuppressive molecules, plant-parasitic nematodes, insect parasitic nematodes, concurrent disorders, nematode control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review