Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 30Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityPlant chemical constituents analysisMedicinal Plant Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 41 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Phytochemical Analysis and Evaluation of Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties of Essential Oils and Seed Extracts of Anethum graveolens from Southern Morocco: In Vitro and In Silico Approach for a Natural Alternative to Synthetic Preservatives

Open access
Hadi, Nadia, Drioiche, Aziz, Bouchra, El Moumen, Baammi, Soukayna, Abdelaziz Shahat, Abdelaaty, Tagnaout, Imane, Radi, Mohamed, Remok, Fidaous, Bouzoubaa, Amal, Zair, Touriya·2024·Pharmaceuticals

Abstract

Anethum graveolens is an aromatic plant traditionally used as an antispasmodic and carminative. The objective of this study is to analyze the chemical composition of the essential oils and extracts obtained from seeds gathered in Errachidia, southern Morocco. Additionally, the antioxidant and antimicrobial properties of these oils and extracts will be evaluated. GC-MS analysis of the EO isolated by hydrodistillation revealed that its main compounds were E-anethole (38.13%), estragole (29.32%), fenchone (17.21%), and α-pinene (7.37%). The phenolic components were extracted using the methods of decoction and Soxhlet. The assay of the phenolic compounds showed that A. graveolens seeds contained considerable amounts of polyphenols, flavonoids, and condensed tannins, with variable levels depending on the extract analyzed. HPLC/UV-ESI-MS analyses performed on the decoction revealed a structural diversity of the molecules present in this extract, the most important of which were umbelliferone (12.35%), 3-hydroxyflavone (11.23%), rosmanol (8.95%), biotin (8.36%), emmotin H (4.91%), and coumarin (4.21%). The antioxidant activity, as determined by three techniques (DPPH•, FRAP, and CAT), demonstrated that the essential oils (EOs) and extracts had a potent capacity to counteract detrimental free radicals, control the generation of reactive oxygen species, and mitigate oxidative damages. The antimicrobial activity of the Eos and extracts was carried out in a liquid medium against five strains (E. cloacae, K. pneumoniae, E. coli, S. aureus, and S. epidermidis) and four candidiasis (C. albicans, C. dubliniensis, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis) and Aspergillus niger. The results showed the effectiveness of the EOs compared to the aqueous, ethanolic, and decoction extracts against most of the microorganisms tested. In addition, the ethanolic extract showed antifungal activity that was distinguished from that of the other extracts. The antimicrobial efficacy of the essential oils under study can primarily be attributed to the synergistic interactions among its three principal constituents (E-anethole, estragole, and fenchone). Furthermore, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation results reveal significant interactions and stability between the selected bioactive compounds and different target proteins involved in antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Compounds like 3-hydroxyflavone, emmotin H, trans-caftaric acid, methyl rosmarinate, 1-caffeoyl-beta-D-glucose, and kaempferol exhibited better binding energies with the explored proteins, indicating their potential as antimicrobial and antioxidant agents. Finally, our findings emphasize the significance of A. graveolens seeds as a promising reservoir of advantageous health compounds that can serve as organic substitutes for the presently employed synthetic preservatives.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study characterizes *Anethum graveolens* seed essential oil and extracts from southern Morocco and evaluates their antioxidant and antimicrobial potential in vitro and in silico. It reports (E)-anethole-rich essential oil, phenolic-rich ethanolic extract, broad antimicrobial activity, and docking/MD evidence for selected compounds as possible natural preservative candidates.

Key findings

  • GC-MS of the hydrodistilled seed essential oil identified (E)-anethole (38.13%), estragole (29.32%), fenchone (17.21%), and α-pinene (7.37%) as main compounds; oil yield was 2.73 ± 0.12% and density 0.9362 ± 0.0732 g/mL.
  • HPLC/UV-ESI-MS of the decoction identified 38 compounds, including umbelliferone (12.35%), 3-hydroxyflavone (11.23%), rosmanol (8.95%), biotin (8.36%), emmotin H (4.91%), and coumarin (4.21%).
  • Antioxidant activity was strongest in the ethanolic extract: DPPH IC50 = 46.90 ± 0.73 μg/mL, FRAP EC50 = 161.33 ± 6.18 μg/mL, and total antioxidant capacity = 72.97 ± 0.71 mg EAA/g E; the essential oil had a DPPH IC50 of 9.02 mg/mL.
  • Antimicrobial testing showed essential oil MIC/MFC values of 3.125–6.25 μL/mL, with *A. niger* and *C. dubliniensis* most sensitive at 3.13 μL/mL; extracts had MIC/MFC values of 0.78–50 mg/mL, with *A. niger* most sensitive at 0.78 mg/mL. Docking highlighted 3-hydroxyflavone, emmotin H, trans-caftaric acid, methyl rosmarinate, 1-caffeoyl-beta-D-glucose, and kaempferol, with binding energies such as methyl rosmarinate–2CAG (−10.2 kcal/mol) and 1-caffeoyl-beta-D-glucose–3NRZ (−10 kcal/mol).

Methods

  • Seeds of *A. graveolens* from Errachidia, southern Morocco, were used; essential oil was obtained by hydrodistillation, and phenolic extracts by decoction and Soxhlet extraction with water or ethanol/water.
  • Chemical profiling used GC-MS for the essential oil and HPLC/UV-ESI-MS for the decoction; total phenolics, flavonoids, and condensed tannins were quantified spectrophotometrically.
  • Antioxidant activity was assessed by DPPH•, FRAP, and total antioxidant capacity assays; antimicrobial activity was tested in liquid medium against five bacterial and five fungal strains, with MIC, MBC, and MFC determination. In silico work used PASS, ADMET/ProTox II, molecular docking with AutoDock Vina, and 100 ns GROMACS molecular dynamics simulations.

Limitations

  • The paper states that further research, including rigorous clinical trials, is necessary to conclusively verify no long-term risks to consumers, and that the compounds still require FDA approval for medical use.
  • The text makes evident that the biological findings are based on in vitro assays and in silico predictions, with no human, animal, or food-matrix preservation trials reported.
  • The antimicrobial evaluation is limited to specific hospital-derived strains, and the paper repeatedly notes that essential oil yield and composition vary with origin, extraction method, and environmental factors, which limits direct generalizability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ph17070862

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Figure 1 Distribution of the main chemical groups in the essential oil of A. graveolens.
Figure 1 Distribution of the main chemical groups in the essential oil of A. graveolens.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Yields of extracts obtained from A. graveolens.
Figure 2 Yields of extracts obtained from A. graveolens.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Contents of total polyphenols (A), flavonoids (B), and condensed tannins (C) in extracts from A. graveolens seeds. The values are means ± SD. Results with different superscripts are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).
Figure 3 Contents of total polyphenols (A), flavonoids (B), and condensed tannins (C) in extracts from A. graveolens seeds. The values are means ± SD. Results with different superscripts are significantly different from each other (p < 0.05).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 IC50 values of A. graveolens and the standard antioxidant BHT using the DPPH method. The results with different letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.001).
Figure 4 IC50 values of A. graveolens and the standard antioxidant BHT using the DPPH method. The results with different letters are significantly different from each other (p < 0.001).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Antioxidant effects of extracts of A. graveolens by DPPH (A), and FRAP methods (B), and CAT (C). Mean values ± standard deviations of determinations performed in triplicate are reported; Means are significantly different (p < 0.001).
Figure 5 Antioxidant effects of extracts of A. graveolens by DPPH (A), and FRAP methods (B), and CAT (C). Mean values ± standard deviations of determinations performed in triplicate are reported; Means are significantly different (p < 0.001).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 2D and 3D Interactions of 3-Hydroxyflavone with the 2CAG Target Protein.
Figure 6 2D and 3D Interactions of 3-Hydroxyflavone with the 2CAG Target Protein.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 2D and 3D interaction of Emmotin H with D-Alanin Ligase protein.
Figure 7 2D and 3D interaction of Emmotin H with D-Alanin Ligase protein.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 2D and 3D Interactions of trans-caftaric Acid with the 2ZDQ Protein.
Figure 8 2D and 3D Interactions of trans-caftaric Acid with the 2ZDQ Protein.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 2D and 3D interaction of methyl rosmarinate with target proteins: (A) 2CAG, (B) 2ZDQ, and (C) 3NRZ.
Figure 9 2D and 3D interaction of methyl rosmarinate with target proteins: (A) 2CAG, (B) 2ZDQ, and (C) 3NRZ.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 10 2D and 3D interaction of 1-Caffeoyl-beta-D-glucose with target proteins: (A) 2CAG, (B) 2ZDQ, and (C) 3NRZ.
Figure 10 2D and 3D interaction of 1-Caffeoyl-beta-D-glucose with target proteins: (A) 2CAG, (B) 2ZDQ, and (C) 3NRZ.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 11 Interaction of 2CAG with kaempferol.
Figure 11 Interaction of 2CAG with kaempferol.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 12 Structural dynamics of the 3NRZ protein: (A) RMSD and (B) RMSF. (C) Total number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. (D) Radius of gyration.
Figure 12 Structural dynamics of the 3NRZ protein: (A) RMSD and (B) RMSF. (C) Total number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. (D) Radius of gyration.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 13 Structural dynamics of the 2CAG protein: (A) RMSD and (B) RMSF. (C) Total number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. (D) Radius of gyration.
Figure 13 Structural dynamics of the 2CAG protein: (A) RMSD and (B) RMSF. (C) Total number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. (D) Radius of gyration.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 14 Structural dynamics of the 2ZDQ protein: (A) RMSD and (B) RMSF. (C) Total number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. (D) Radius of gyration.
Figure 14 Structural dynamics of the 2ZDQ protein: (A) RMSD and (B) RMSF. (C) Total number of intramolecular hydrogen bonds. (D) Radius of gyration.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

97 Own result · 34 Own interpretation · 8 Check pending · 8 Own method · 6 Not checked yet · 5 No full text of the sources · 2 Sources not found · 1 No basis given

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 52
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 27

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

81 more claims

Create a free account to see all 161 claims and to verify the 20 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

5 of 9 · the rest aren’t loaded

4 more findings

Create a free account to see every finding of this check.

See all findings — free account

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 78 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Znini, 2019, Experimental, Quantum Chemical and Molecular Dynamic Simulations Studies on the Corrosion Inhibition of C38 Steel in 1M HCl by Anethum graveolens Essential Oil, Anal. Bioanal. Electrochem, 11, 1426
  2. Bousta, 2016, Antioxidant Activity of Aqueous Seed Extract of Anethum graveolens, L., Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res., 7, 1219
  3. Singh, 2020, Assessment of Antioxidant Activity of Foeniculum Vulgare Seed Extract Using Fenton Reaction, Res. J. Med. Plants Ayurveda, 1, 1
  4. Preedy, V.R. (2016). Dill (Anethum graveolens, L.) Oils. Essential Oils in Food Preservation, Flavor and Safety, Academic Press.
  5. Tekade, 2021, Chapter 4—Pharmacokinetics Aspects of Structural Modifications in Drug Design and Therapy, Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics Considerations, Volume 1, 83
  6. Mogode, D.J. (2005). Etude Phytochimique et Pharmacologique de Cassia Nigricans Vahl (Caesalpiniaceae) Utilisé Dans Le Traitement Des Dermatoses Au Tchad. [Ph.D. Thesis, Université de N’Djaména].
  7. Bekro, 2007, Étude Ethnobotanique et Screening Phytochimique de Caesalpinia benthamiana (Baill.) Herend. et Zarucchi (Caesalpiniaceae), Sci. Nat., 4, 217

Cited by

See all 30

Metadata

Authors
Hadi, N., Drioiche, A., Bouchra, E. M., Baammi, S., Abdelaziz Shahat, A., Tagnaout, I., Radi, M., Remok, F., Bouzoubaa, A., & Zair, T.
Affiliations
  • Université Moulay Ismail de Meknes (MA)
  • Research Team of Chemistry of Bioactive Molecules and the Environment, Laboratory of Innovative Materials and Biotechnology of Natural Resources, Faculty of Sciences, Moulay Ismaïl University, B.P. 11201, Zitoune, Meknes 50070, Morocco
  • Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA)
  • Pharmacognosy Department, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Corresponding author
  • Drioiche, Aziz
  • Zair, Touriya
Venue
Pharmaceuticals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-07-01
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
862
ISSN
1424-8247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400292961
Cited by
30
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmaceuticals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (RSPD2024R1057)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant chemical constituents analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Medicinal Plant Research
Keywords
dill, seed extract, phytochemical composition, antioxidant activity, antimicrobial activity, antifungal activity, antibacterial activity, (E)-anethole, estragole, fenchone, phenolic compounds, flavonoids, proanthocyanidins, coumarins, umbelliferone, natural preservatives, food preservatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review