CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Oil-Seed Shell Biomass-Based Biochar for the Removal of Anionic Dyes—Characterization and Adsorption Efficiency Studies

Sutradhar, Shrikanta, Mondal, Arijit, Kuehne, Felix, Krueger, Oliver, Rakshit, Sudip K., Kang, Kang·2024·Plants
DOI 10.3390/plants13060820PMC PMC10975770
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This research investigated the synthesis of biochar through the direct pyrolysis of pre-roasted sunflower seed shells (SFS) and peanut shells (PNS) and compared their application for the effective removal of textile dyes from wastewater. Biochar prepared at 900 °C (SFS900 and PNS900) showed the highest adsorption capacity, which can be attributed to the presence of higher nitrogen content and graphite-like structures. CHNS analysis revealed that PNS900 exhibited an 11.4% higher carbon content than SFS900, which enhanced the environmental stability of PNS biochar. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses of the produced biochar indicated the degradation of cellulosic and lignin moieties. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed a 13.8% and 22.6% increase in C-C/C=C mass concentrations in the SFS900 and PNS900, respectively, and could be attributed to the condensation of polyaromatic structures. Batch experiments for dye removal demonstrated that irrespective of dye species, PNS900 exhibited superior dye removal efficiency compared to SFS900 at similar dosages. In addition to H-bonding and electrostatic interactions, the presence of pyridinic-N and graphitic-N can play a vital role in enhancing Lewis acid-base and π-π EDA interactions. The results can provide valuable insights into the biochar–dye interaction mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/plants13060820

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Kumar, 2022, A Review on Emerging Water Contaminants and the Application of Sustainable Removal Technologies, Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng., 6, 100219, 10.1016/j.cscee.2022.100219 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zhang, 2023, Development of Loose Thin Film Nanofibrous Composite Nanofiltration Membrane with Modified G-C3n4 Nanosheets Barrier Layer for Efficient Separation of Salt/Dye Mixtures, Sep. Purif. Technol., 306, 122661, 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.122661 · DOI
  3. Ahmed, 2016, A Review on Potential Usage of Industrial Waste Materials for Binding Heavy Metal Ions from Aqueous Solutions, J. Water Process Eng., 10, 39, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2016.01.014 · DOI
  4. Hussain, A., and Ahmed, S. (2019). Advanced Treatment Techniques for Industrial Wastewater, IGI Global. · DOI
  5. Zare, 2016, Equilibrium and Kinetic Study of Ammonium Ion Adsorption by Fe3O4 Nanoparticles from Aqueous Solutions, J. Mol. Liq., 213, 345, 10.1016/j.molliq.2015.08.045 · DOI
  6. Shahbaz, 2022, A Review of Pyrolysis Technologies and Feedstock: A Blending Approach for Plastic and Biomass Towards Optimum Biochar Yield, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 167, 112715, 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112715 · DOI
  7. Wang, 2019, Preparation, Modification and Environmental Application of Biochar: A Review, J. Clean. Prod., 227, 1002, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Jia, 2022, Effect of Pre-Oxidation Temperature and Heating Rate on the Microstructure of Lignin Carbon Fibers, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 216, 388, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.06.191 · DOI
  9. Kang, K., Hu, Y., Khan, I., He, S., and Fatehi, P. (2023). Recent Advances in the Synthesis and Application of Magnetic Biochar for Wastewater Treatment. Bioresour. Technol., 390. · DOI
  10. Wijitkosum, 2022, Biochar Derived from Agricultural Wastes and Wood Residues for Sustainable Agricultural and Environmental Applications, Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res., 10, 335, 10.1016/j.iswcr.2021.09.006 · DOI
  11. Bernhardt, 2021, Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Seed Hull Waste: Composition, Antioxidant Activity, and Filler Performance in Pectin-Based Film Composites, Front. Nutr., 8, 777214, 10.3389/fnut.2021.777214 · DOI
  12. Fermanelli, 2022, Towards Biowastes Valorization: Peanut Shell as Resource for Quality Chemicals and Activated Biochar Production, Sustain. Environ. Res., 32, 3, 10.1186/s42834-021-00112-9 · DOI
  13. Duc, P.A., Dharanipriya, P., Velmurugan, B.K., and Shanmugavadivu, M. (2019). Groundnut Shell—A Beneficial Bio-Waste. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol., 20. · DOI
  14. Seiler, G.J., and Gulya, T.J. (2016). Reference Module in Food Science, Elsevier.
  15. Ge, Q., Li, P., Liu, M., Xiao, G.M., Xiao, Z.Q., Mao, J.W., and Gai, X.K. (2023). Removal of Methylene Blue by Porous Biochar Obtained by Koh Activation from Bamboo Biochar. Bioresour. Bioprocess., 10. · DOI
  16. Ghzal, 2023, Potential of Easily Prepared Low-Cost Rice Husk Biochar and Burnt Clay Composite for the Removal of Methylene Blue Dye from Contaminated Water, Environ. Sci. Water Res. Technol., 9, 2925, 10.1039/D3EW00392B · DOI
  17. Arya, 2020, Adsorptive Removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R Dye from Its Aqueous Solution by Activated Charcoal of Thuja Orientalis Leaves: An Eco-Friendly Approach, SN Appl. Sci., 2, 265, 10.1007/s42452-020-2063-2 · DOI
  18. Parimelazhagan, V., Yashwath, P., Arukkani Pushparajan, D., and Carpenter, J. (2022). Rapid Removal of Toxic Remazol Brilliant Blue-R Dye from Aqueous Solutions Using Juglans Nigra Shell Biomass Activated Carbon as Potential Adsorbent: Optimization, Isotherm, Kinetic, and Thermodynamic Investigation. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 23. · DOI
  19. Hua, 2023, Adsorption of Congo Red Dye in Water by Orange Peel Biochar Modified with Ctab, RSC Adv., 13, 12502, 10.1039/D3RA01444D · DOI
  20. Rubangakene, 2023, Biosorption of Congo Red Dye from Aqueous Solutions Using Pristine Biochar and Zno Biochar from Green Pea Peels, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 189, 636, 10.1016/j.cherd.2022.12.003 · DOI
  21. Glaser, 2002, Ameliorating Physical and Chemical Properties of Highly Weathered Soils in the Tropics with Charcoal—A Review, Biol. Fertil. Soils, 35, 219, 10.1007/s00374-002-0466-4 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Mohd, 2013, Biochar Production from Waste Rubber-Wood-Sawdust and Its Potential Use in C Sequestration: Chemical and Physical Characterization, Ind. Crops Prod., 44, 18, 10.1016/j.indcrop.2012.10.017 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Ahmad, 2014, Biochar as a Sorbent for Contaminant Management in Soil and Water: A Review, Chemosphere, 99, 19, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.10.071 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Donadelli, 2023, Removal of Diclofenac and Ibuprofen on Mesoporous Activated Carbon from Agro-Industrial Wastes Prepared by Optimized Synthesis Employing a Central Composite Design, Biomass Convers. Biorefinery, 13, 13197, 10.1007/s13399-021-02227-w · DOI
  25. Sutradhar, 2023, A Green Cement Plasticizer from Softwood Kraft Lignin, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 62, 1676, 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c03970 · DOI
  26. Kasera, N., Kolar, P., and Hall, S.G. (2022). Nitrogen-Doped Biochars as Adsorbents for Mitigation of Heavy Metals and Organics from Water: A Review. Biochar, 4. · DOI
  27. Seredych, 2008, Surface Functional Groups of Carbons and the Effects of Their Chemical Character, Density and Accessibility to Ions on Electrochemical Performance, Carbon, 46, 1475, 10.1016/j.carbon.2008.06.027 · DOI
  28. Rehrah, 2014, Production and Characterization of Biochars from Agricultural by-Products for Use in Soil Quality Enhancement, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 108, 301, 10.1016/j.jaap.2014.03.008 · DOI
  29. Li, 2016, Effect of Pyrolytic Temperature on the Adsorptive Removal of P-Benzoquinone, Tetracycline, and Polyvinyl Alcohol by the Biochars from Sugarcane Bagasse, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 33, 2215, 10.1007/s11814-016-0067-9 · DOI
  30. Trache, 2020, Comparison of the Physicochemical Properties and Thermal Stability of Organosolv and Kraft Lignins from Hardwood and Softwood Biomass for Their Potential Valorization, Waste Biomass Valoriz., 11, 6541, 10.1007/s12649-020-00955-0 · DOI
  31. Dehkhoda, 2014, Electrosorption on Activated Biochar: Effect of Thermo-Chemical Activation Treatment on the Electric Double Layer Capacitance, J. Appl. Electrochem., 44, 141, 10.1007/s10800-013-0616-4 · DOI
  32. Jing, 2018, Kinetic and Isothermal Adsorption-Desorption of Paes on Biochars: Effect of Biomass Feedstock, Pyrolysis Temperature, and Mechanism Implication of Desorption Hysteresis, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 11493, 10.1007/s11356-018-1356-0 · DOI
  33. Chowdhury, 2016, Influence of Carbonization Temperature on Physicochemical Properties of Biochar Derived from Slow Pyrolysis of Durian Wood (Durio Zibethinus) Sawdust, BioResources, 11, 3356, 10.15376/biores.11.2.3356-3372 · DOI
  34. Li, 2007, X-Ray Diffraction Patterns of Graphite and Turbostratic Carbon, Carbon, 45, 1686, 10.1016/j.carbon.2007.03.038 · DOI
  35. Yeboah, M.L., Li, X., and Zhou, S. (2020). Facile Fabrication of Biochar from Palm Kernel Shell Waste and Its Novel Application to Magnesium-Based Materials for Hydrogen Storage. Materials, 13. · DOI
  36. Panczyk, 2014, Molecular Dynamics Study of Congo Red Interaction with Carbon Nanotubes, RSC Adv., 4, 47304, 10.1039/C4RA06806H · DOI
  37. Alarifi, 2021, Properties and Application of Mos2 Nanopowder: Characterization, Congo Red Dye Adsorption, and Optimization, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 13, 1169, 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.028 · DOI
  38. Loc, 2019, Efficiency of Dye Adsorption by Biochars Produced from Residues of Two Rice Varieties, Japanese Koshihikari and Vietnamese Ir50404, Desalin. Water Treat, 165, 333, 10.5004/dwt.2019.24496 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Sharma, 2011, Sugarcane Bagasse for the Removal of Erythrosin B and Methylene Blue from Aqueous Waste, Appl. Water Sci., 1, 135, 10.1007/s13201-011-0018-x · DOI
  40. Tan, 2020, Mechanism of Negative Surface Charge Formation on Biochar and Its Effect on the Fixation of Soil Cd, J. Hazard. Mater., 384, 121370, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121370 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Banik, 2018, Impact of Pyrolysis Temperature and Feedstock on Surface Charge and Functional Group Chemistry of Biochars, J. Environ. Qual., 47, 452, 10.2134/jeq2017.11.0432 · DOI
  42. Wang, 2018, Microwave-Assisted Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Biochars by Ammonium Acetate Activation for Adsorption of Acid Red 18, Appl. Surf. Sci., 433, 222, 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.10.031 · DOI
  43. Thomas, 2022, Nutmeg Seed Shell Biochar as an Effective Adsorbent for Removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue Reactive Dye: Kinetic, Isotherm, and Thermodynamic Study, Energy Sources Part A Recovery Util. Environ. Eff., 44, 893
  44. Raj, 2021, Kinetic and Thermodynamic Investigations of Sewage Sludge Biochar in Removal of Remazol Brilliant Blue R Dye from Aqueous Solution and Evaluation of Residual Dyes Cytotoxicity, Environ. Technol. Innov., 23, 101556, 10.1016/j.eti.2021.101556 · DOI
  45. Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Fan, L., Liu, X., Cao, W., Ai, H., Wang, Z., Liu, X., and Jia, H. (2022). Sorbent Properties of Orange Peel-Based Biochar for Different Pollutants in Water. Processes, 10. · DOI
  46. Abdullah, 2023, Adsorption of Remazol Brilliant Blue R Dye onto Jackfruit Peel Based Activated Carbon: Optimization and Simulation for Mass Transfer and Surface Area Prediction, Inorg. Chem. Commun., 158, 111721, 10.1016/j.inoche.2023.111721 · DOI
  47. Sutradhar, 2022, KOH Catalyzed Oxidation of Kraft Lignin to Produce Green Fertilizer, Catal. Today, 404, 49, 10.1016/j.cattod.2022.08.007 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Sutradhar, S., Mondal, A., Kuehne, F., Krueger, O., Rakshit, S. K., & Kang, K.
Venue
Plants
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-03-13
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
820
ISSN
2223-7747
DOI
10.3390/plants13060820
PMC
PMC10975770
Cited by
24
References
4
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Canada Research Chair Program (Sudip Rakshit), NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada) (RGPIN-2023-03289)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review