Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 285

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 146 of the 146 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Critical Review of Natural Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Composites: Processing, Properties, Applications and Cost

Open access
Suriani, M. J., Ilyas, R. A., Zuhri, M. Y. M., Khalina, A., Sultan, M. T. H., Sapuan, S. M., Ruzaidi, C. M., Wan, F. Nik, Zulkifli, F., Harussani, M. M., Azman, M. A., Radzi, F. S. M., Sharma, Shubham·2021·Polymers

Abstract

Increasing scientific interest has occurred concerning the utilization of natural fiber-enhanced hybrid composites that incorporate one or more types of natural enhancement. Annual natural fiber production is estimated to be 1,783,965 × 103 tons/year. Extensive studies have been conducted in the domains of natural/synthetic as well as natural/natural hybrid composites. As synthetic fibers have better rigidity and strength than natural fibers, natural/synthetic hybrid composites have superior qualities via hybridization compared to natural composites in fibers. In general, natural fiber compounds have lower characteristics, limiting the use of natural composites reinforced by fiber. Significant effort was spent in enhancing the mechanical characteristics of this group of materials to increase their strengths and applications, especially via the hybridization process, by manipulating the characteristics of fiber-reinforced composite materials. Current studies concentrate on enhancing the understanding of natural fiber-matrix adhesion, enhancing processing methods, and natural fiber compatibility. The optimal and resilient conceptions have also been addressed due to the inherently more significant variabilities. Moreover, much research has tackled natural fiber reinforced hybrid composite costs. In addition, this review article aims to offer a review of the variables that lead to the mechanical and structural failure of natural fiber reinforced polymer composites, as well as an overview of the details and costings of the composites.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/polym13203514

Cites

146 of 146 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 146 references

Cited by

See all 285

Metadata

Authors
Suriani, M. J., Ilyas, R. A., Zuhri, M. Y. M., Khalina, A., Sultan, M. T. H., Sapuan, S. M., Ruzaidi, C. M., Wan, F. N., Zulkifli, F., Harussani, M. M., Azman, M. A., Radzi, F. S. M., & Sharma, S.
Venue
Polymers
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-10-13
Volume
13
Issue
20
Pages
3514
ISSN
2073-4360 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3205624801
Cited by
285
References
146
FWCI
12.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review of Natural Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Composites: Processing, Properties, Applications and Cost. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/polym13203514
The paper
Suriani, M. J., Ilyas, R. A., Zuhri, M. Y. M., Khalina, A., Sultan, M. T. H., Sapuan, S. M., Ruzaidi, C. M., Wan, F. N., Zulkifli, F., Harussani, M. M., Azman, M. A., Radzi, F. S. M., & Sharma, S. (2021). Critical Review of Natural Fiber Reinforced Hybrid Composites: Processing, Properties, Applications and Cost. Polymers. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13203514

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.