The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial Natural Products in Drug Discovery
Open accessAbstract
Over a long period of time, humans have explored many natural resources looking for remedies of various ailments. Traditional medicines have played an intrinsic role in human life for thousands of years, with people depending on medicinal plants and their products as dietary supplements as well as using them therapeutically for treatment of chronic disorders, such as cancer, malaria, diabetes, arthritis, inflammation, and liver and cardiac disorders. However, plant resources are not sufficient for treatment of recently emerging diseases. In addition, the seasonal availability and other political factors put constrains on some rare plant species. The actual breakthrough in drug discovery came concurrently with the discovery of penicillin from Penicillium notatum in 1929. This discovery dramatically changed the research of natural products and positioned microbial natural products as one of the most important clues in drug discovery due to availability, variability, great biodiversity, unique structures, and the bioactivities produced. The number of commercially available therapeutically active compounds from microbial sources to date exceeds those discovered from other sources. In this review, we introduce a short history of microbial drug discovery as well as certain features and recent research approaches, specifying the microbial origin, their featured molecules, and the diversity of the producing species. Moreover, we discuss some bioactivities as well as new approaches and trends in research in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Natural products as sources of new drugs over the 30 years from 1981 to 2010
Newman, D. J., & Cragg, G. M. (2012) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np200906s · Cited by 4,687
Cyanobacteria secondary metabolites—the cyanotoxins
Carmichael, W. W. (1992) · Journal of Applied Bacteriology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1992.tb01858.x · Cited by 1,457
The role of natural product chemistry in drug discovery
Butler, M. S. (2004) · Journal of Natural Products · doi:10.1021/np040106y · Cited by 1,381
The influence of natural products upon drug discovery (Antiquity to late 1999)
Newman, D. J., Cragg, G. M., & Snader, K. M. (2000) · Natural Product Reports · doi:10.1039/a902202c · Cited by 1,293
HOW MANY SPECIES OF ALGAE ARE THERE?
Guiry, M. D. (2012) · Journal of Phycology · doi:10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x · Cited by 1,002
El-Sayed, S. M., El-Naggar, M. E., Hussein, J., Medhat, D., & El-Banna, M. (2019) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110465 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Cited by
Natural products: A lead for drug discovery and development
Chopra, B., & Dhingra, A. K. (2021) · Phytotherapy Research · doi:10.1002/ptr.7099 · Cited by 469
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdel-Razek, A. S., El-Naggar, M. E., Allam, A., Morsy, O. M., & Othman, S. I.
- Venue
- Processes
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-04-16
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 470
- ISSN
- 2227-9717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3017321044
- Cited by
- 237
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 13.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial Natural Products in Drug Discovery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/pr8040470
- The paper
- Abdel-Razek, A. S., El-Naggar, M. E., Allam, A., Morsy, O. M., & Othman, S. I. (2020). Microbial Natural Products in Drug Discovery. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8040470
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.