Cited by 10Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchCognitive Abilities and TestingRace, Genetics, and Society

The Effect of Biracial Status and Color on Crystallized Intelligence in the U.S.-Born African–European American Population

Open access
Fuerst, John, Lynn, Richard, Kirkegaard, Emil·2019·Psych

Abstract

The relationship between biracial status, color, and crystallized intelligence was examined in a nationally representative sample of adult Black and White Americans. First, it was found that self-identifying biracial individuals, who were found to be intermediate in color and in self-reported ancestry, had intermediate levels of crystallized intelligence relative to self-identifying White (mostly European ancestry) and Black (mostly sub-Saharan African ancestry) Americans. The results were transformed to an IQ scale: White (M = 100.00, N = 7569), primarily White–biracial (M = 96.07, N = 43, primarily Black–biracial (M = 94.14 N = 50), and Black (M = 89.81, N = 1381). Next, among self-identifying African Americans, a statistically significant negative correlation of r = −0.102 (N = 637) was found between interviewer-rated darker facial color and vocabulary scores. After correction for the reliability of the measures, this correlation increased to r = −0.21. Corrections for the validity of color as an index of African ancestry would raise this correlation to around r = −0.48. This association among self-identifying African Americans was not accounted for by confounding factors, such as region of residence and interviewer race, or by parental socioeconomic status and individual educational attainment. In the multivariate models, the standardized betas for color and crystallized intelligence among African Americans ranged from β = −0.112 to β = −0.142. Based on the coefficients f…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/psych1010004

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skin color was related to cognitive ability in models not including ancestry, as found in previous studies.

    “However, it was related to cognitive ability in models not including ancestry, as found in previous studies [17,[94][95][96] (for a review of older studies, see [1]).”

    From Global Ancestry and Cognitive Ability (2019) · cites this paper as [95]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fuerst, J., Lynn, R., & Kirkegaard, E.
Affiliations
Ulster Institute for Social Research, London, UK
Corresponding author
Fuerst, John
Venue
Psych
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-03-07
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
44-54
ISSN
2624-8611 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921259057
Cited by
10
References
38
Citations by year
2023: 8 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Psych (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
Keywords
mixed-race identity, crystallized intelligence, IQ, African Americans, European Americans, facial color, ancestry, vocabulary, cognitive ability, biogeographic ancestry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review