Cited by 47Cognitive Abilities and TestingRace, Genetics, and SocietyIntergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies

Heredity, environment, and race differences in IQ: A commentary on Rushton and Jensen (2005).

Nisbett, Richard E.·2005·Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Abstract

J. P. Rushton and A. R. Jensen (2005) ignore or misinterpret most of the evidence of greatest relevance to the question of heritability of the Black–White IQ gap. A dispassionate reading of the evidence on the association of IQ with degree of European ancestry for members of Black populations, convergence of Black and White IQ in recent years, alterability of Black IQ by intervention programs, and adoption studies lend no support to a hereditarian interpretation of the Black–White IQ gap. On the contrary, the evidence most relevant to the question indicates that the genetic contribution to the Black–White IQ gap is nil. Rushton and Jensen’s (2005) article is characterized by failure to cite, in any but the most cursory way, strong evidence against their position. Their lengthy presentation of indirectly relevant evidence which, in light of the direct evidence against the hereditarian view they prefer, has little probative value, and their “scorecard” tallies of evidence on various points cannot be sustained by the evidence.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1076-8971.11.2.302

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bennett, 1987, Schools that work.
  2. Hedges, 1998, Black-White test score convergence since 1965., 149
  3. Nisbett, 1995, Race, IQ and scientism., 36
  4. Nisbett, 1998, Race, genetics, and IQ., 86

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nisbett, R. E.
Corresponding author
Nisbett, Richard E.
Venue
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
Published
2005-06
Volume
11
Issue
2
Pages
302-310
ISSN
  • 1076-8971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1528
OpenAlex
W2165549402
Cited by
47
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
5.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychology Public Policy and Law (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Race, Genetics, and Society
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
Keywords
heritability of intelligence, European ancestry, adoption studies, environmental influences on intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review