Human–Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing Applications: A Review
Open accessAbstract
This paper provides an overview of collaborative robotics towards manufacturing applications. Over the last decade, the market has seen the introduction of a new category of robots—collaborative robots (or “cobots”)—designed to physically interact with humans in a shared environment, without the typical barriers or protective cages used in traditional robotics systems. Their potential is undisputed, especially regarding their flexible ability to make simple, quick, and cheap layout changes; however, it is necessary to have adequate knowledge of their correct uses and characteristics to obtain the advantages of this form of robotics, which can be a barrier for industry uptake. The paper starts with an introduction of human–robot collaboration, presenting the related standards and modes of operation. An extensive literature review of works published in this area is undertaken, with particular attention to the main industrial cases of application. The paper concludes with an analysis of the future trends in human–robot collaboration as determined by the authors.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collaborative regimes can be realised using industrial robots, laser sensors, and vision systems, or controller alteration, if compliance with the ISO/TS 15066 standard is ensured.
“According to [22], collaborative regimes can be realised using industrial robots, laser sensors, and vision systems, or controller alteration if compliance with the ISO/TS 15066 standard-which specifies parameters and materials adapted to safe activities with and near humans-is ensured [23].”
From Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities (2021) · cites this paper as [22]
Cites
Cobots: Robots for Collaboration With Human Operators
Colgate, J. E., Wannasuphoprasit, W., & Peshkin, M. A. (1996) · Dynamic Systems and Control · doi:10.1115/imece1996-0367 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advanced Applications of Industrial Robotics: New Trends and Possibilities
Dzedzickis, A., Subačiūtė-Žemaitienė, J., Šutinys, E., Samukaitė-Bubnienė, U., & Bučinskas, V. (2021) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app12010135 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
- Authors
- Matheson, E., Minto, R., Zampieri, E. G. G., Faccio, M., & Rosati, G.
- Affiliations
- Imperial College London (GB)
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Minto, Riccardo
- Venue
- Robotics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-12-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 100
- ISSN
- 2218-6581 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2993247505
- Cited by
- 668
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 101 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 14
- FWCI
- 22.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Robotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Regione del Veneto (2105-55-11-2018)
- Università degli Studi di Padova (Program BIRD 2018 - Project. no. BIRD187930)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Keywords
- human-robot collaboration, collaborative robots, manufacturing applications, human-robot interaction, industrial robots, robot safety standards
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review