Cited by 668Robot Manipulation and LearningRobotics and Automated SystemsProsthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics

Human–Robot Collaboration in Manufacturing Applications: A Review

Open access
Matheson, Eloise, Minto, Riccardo, Zampieri, Emanuele G. G., Faccio, Maurizio, Rosati, Giulio·2019·Robotics

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of collaborative robotics towards manufacturing applications. Over the last decade, the market has seen the introduction of a new category of robots—collaborative robots (or “cobots”)—designed to physically interact with humans in a shared environment, without the typical barriers or protective cages used in traditional robotics systems. Their potential is undisputed, especially regarding their flexible ability to make simple, quick, and cheap layout changes; however, it is necessary to have adequate knowledge of their correct uses and characteristics to obtain the advantages of this form of robotics, which can be a barrier for industry uptake. The paper starts with an introduction of human–robot collaboration, presenting the related standards and modes of operation. An extensive literature review of works published in this area is undertaken, with particular attention to the main industrial cases of application. The paper concludes with an analysis of the future trends in human–robot collaboration as determined by the authors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/robotics8040100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Collaborative regimes can be realised using industrial robots, laser sensors, and vision systems, or controller alteration, if compliance with the ISO/TS 15066 standard is ensured.

    “According to [22], collaborative regimes can be realised using industrial robots, laser sensors, and vision systems, or controller alteration if compliance with the ISO/TS 15066 standard-which specifies parameters and materials adapted to safe activities with and near humans-is ensured [23].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matheson, E., Minto, R., Zampieri, E. G. G., Faccio, M., & Rosati, G.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • University of Padua (IT)
Corresponding author
Minto, Riccardo
Venue
Robotics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-12-06
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
100
ISSN
2218-6581 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993247505
Cited by
668
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 101 · 2025: 129 · 2024: 135 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 14
FWCI
22.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Robotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Regione del Veneto (2105-55-11-2018)
  • Università degli Studi di Padova (Program BIRD 2018 - Project. no. BIRD187930)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Keywords
human-robot collaboration, collaborative robots, manufacturing applications, human-robot interaction, industrial robots, robot safety standards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review