Cited by 41Remote Sensing in AgricultureCrop Yield and Soil FertilitySmart Agriculture and AI

Use of multispectral airborne images to improve in-season nitrogen management, predict grain yield and estimate economic return of maize in irrigated high yielding environments

Open access
Maresma, Ángel, Lloveras, Jaume, Martínez-Casasnovas, José·2018·Remote Sensing

Abstract

Vegetation indices (VIs) derived from active or passive sensors have been used for maize growth monitoring and real-time nitrogen (N) management at field scale. In the present multilocation two-year study, multispectral VIs (green- and red-based), chlorophyll meter (SPAD) and plant height (PltH) measured at V12–VT stage of maize development, were used to distinguish among the N status of maize, to predict grain yield and economic return in high yielding environments. Moreover, linear plateau-models were performed with VIs, SPAD and PltH measurements to determine the amount of N needed to achieve maximum maize grain yields and economic return. The available N in the topsoil (0–30 cm) was measured, and its relationship with VIs, maize yield and maize N requirements was analyzed. Green-based VIs were the most accurate indices to predict grain yield and to estimate the grain yield optimum N rate (GYONr) (216.8 kg N ha−1), but underestimated the grain yield optimum N available (GYONa) (248.6 kg N ha−1). Red-based VIs slightly overestimated the GYONr and GYONa, while SPAD highly underestimated both of them. The determination of the available N did not improve the accuracy of the VIs to determine the grain yield. The green chlorophyll index (GCI) distinguished maize that would yield less than 84% of the maximum yield, showing a high potential to detect and correct maize N deficiencies at V12 stage. The economic optimum nitrogen rate (EONr) and economic optimum nitrogen available (EONa) were determined below the GYONr and the GYONa, demonstrating that maximum grain yield strategies in maize are not normally the most profitable for farmers. Further research is needed to fine-tune the response of maize to N applications when deficiencies are detected at V12 stage, but airborne imagery could be useful for practical farming implementation in irrigated high yielding environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs10040543

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Better cropping systems, fertilization, irrigation practices, and advanced digital agriculture technologies can reduce N fertilizer input and N2O emissions.

    “Better cropping systems, fertilization, and irrigation practices, and the use of advanced digital agriculture technologies, such as multi-sensor drone technology to allow farmers to manage crops, soil, fertilization, and irrigation more effectively and precisely, can reduce N fertilizer input and N2O emissions.117,118”

    From Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality (2021) · cites this paper as [117]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [6]6. Lloveras, J.; Cabases, M.J. Costes de producci ó n de cultivos extensivos en secano y regad í o. Vida Rural 2015 , 401 , 38-47.
  2. [33]33. Isla, R.; Qu í lez, D.; Valent í n, F.; Casterad, M.A.; Aibar, J.; Maturano, M. Utilizaci ó n de im á genes a é reas multiespectrales para evaluar la disponibilidad de nitr ó geno en ma í z. In Proceedings of the XIV Congreso de la Asociaci ó n Española de Teledetecci ó n, Mieres, Spain, 21-23 September 2011.
  3. [42]42. Soil Survey Staff. Keys to Soil Taxonomy , 12th ed.; USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2014; Volume 12, p. 410.
  4. [43]43. MAPA. M é todos Oficiales de An á lisis de Suelos y Aguas para el Riego. In Publicaciones del Minesterio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentaci ó n ; Tomo III; Ministerio de Agricultura y Pesca: Madrid, Spain, 1994; Volume 3, pp. 1-40.
  5. [45]45. Rouse, J.W.; Haas, R.H.; Schell, J.A.; Deering, D.W. Monitoring Vegetation Systems in the Great Plains with Erts. In Goddard Space Flight Center 3d ERTS-1 Symposium ; Texas A&M University: College Station, TX, USA, 1974; Volume 351, pp. 309-317.
  6. [63]63. Papadopoulos, A.; Iatrou, M.; Papadopoulos, F.; Metaxa, I.; Theodoridou, S.; Kalogeropoulos, K.; Kiparissi, S. Preliminary results for standardization of ndvi using soil nitrates in corn growing. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2014 , 23 , 348-354.
  7. [64]64. Liu, K.; Wiatrak, P. Corn production and plant characteristics response to N fertilization management in dry-land conventional tillage system. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2011 , 5 , 405-416.
  8. [78]78. Tahir, M.N.; Li, J.; Liu, B.; Zhao, G.; Fuqi, Y.; Cui, C. Hyperspectral estimation model for nitrogen contents of summer corn leaves under rainfed conditions. Pak. J. Bot. 2013 , 45 , 1623-1630.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maresma, Á., Lloveras, J., & Martínez-Casasnovas, J.
Affiliations
Universitat de Lleida (ES)
Corresponding author
Maresma, Ángel
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-04-02
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
543
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2794728239
Cited by
41
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UdL Open Repository (University of Lleida) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repositori ObertUDL (University of Lleida) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (AGL2012-35122)
  • Universitat de Lleida
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Remote Sensing in Agriculture
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
Keywords
maize, nitrogen management, vegetation indices, grain yield prediction, economic returns, green chlorophyll index, SPAD chlorophyll meter, plant height, optimal nitrogen rate, nitrogen availability, nitrogen deficiency detection, linear-plateau model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review