The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Remote Sensing at Ultra-High Resolution with UAV Spectroscopy: A Review of Sensor Technology, Measurement Procedures, and Data Correction Workflows
Open accessAbstract
In the last 10 years, development in robotics, computer vision, and sensor technology has provided new spectral remote sensing tools to capture unprecedented ultra-high spatial and high spectral resolution with unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). This development has led to a revolution in geospatial data collection in which not only few specialist data providers collect and deliver remotely sensed data, but a whole diverse community is potentially able to gather geospatial data that fit their needs. However, the diversification of sensing systems and user applications challenges the common application of good practice procedures that ensure the quality of the data. This challenge can only be met by establishing and communicating common procedures that have had demonstrated success in scientific experiments and operational demonstrations. In this review, we evaluate the state-of-the-art methods in UAV spectral remote sensing and discuss sensor technology, measurement procedures, geometric processing, and radiometric calibration based on the literature and more than a decade of experimentation. We follow the ‘journey’ of the reflected energy from the particle in the environment to its representation as a pixel in a 2D or 2.5D map, or 3D spectral point cloud. Additionally, we reflect on the current revolution in remote sensing, and identify trends, potential opportunities, and limitations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817
Monocular‐SLAM–based navigation for autonomous micro helicopters in GPS‐denied environments
Weiss, S., Scaramuzza, D., & Siegwart, R. (2011) · Journal of Field Robotics · doi:10.1002/rob.20412 · Cited by 414
(2010) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8878-0 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Yang, W., Feng, H., Zhang, X., Zhang, J., Doonan, J. H., Batchelor, W. D., Xiong, L., & Yan, J. (2020) · Molecular Plant · doi:10.1016/j.molp.2020.01.008 · Cited by 961
Precision farming at the nexus of agricultural production and the environment
Finger, R., Swinton, S. M., El Benni, N., & Walter, A. (2019) · Annual Review of Resource Economics · doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-093929 · Cited by 539
Yue, J., Yang, G., Tian, Q., Feng, H., Xu, K., & Zhou, C. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.022 · Cited by 423
Stuart, M. B., McGonigle, A. J. S., & Willmott, J. R. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19143071 · Cited by 420
A Review of Digital Twin Applications in Civil and Infrastructure Emergency Management
Cheng, R., Hou, L., & Xu, S. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13051143 · Cited by 94
Metadata
- Authors
- Aasen, H., Honkavaara, E., Lucieer, A., & Zarco-Tejada, P. J.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-07-09
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1091
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2843415492
- Cited by
- 647
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Remote Sensing at Ultra-High Resolution with UAV Spectroscopy: A Review of Sensor Technology, Measurement Procedures, and Data Correction Workflows. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs10071091
- The paper
- Aasen, H., Honkavaara, E., Lucieer, A., & Zarco-Tejada, P. J. (2018). Quantitative Remote Sensing at Ultra-High Resolution with UAV Spectroscopy: A Review of Sensor Technology, Measurement Procedures, and Data Correction Workflows. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10071091
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.