Cited by 104Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAutonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety

MultEYE: Monitoring System for Real-Time Vehicle Detection, Tracking and Speed Estimation from UAV Imagery on Edge-Computing Platforms

Open access
Balamuralidhar, Navaneeth, Tilon, Sofia, Nex, Francesco·2021·Remote Sensing

Abstract

We present MultEYE, a traffic monitoring system that can detect, track, and estimate the velocity of vehicles in a sequence of aerial images. The presented solution has been optimized to execute these tasks in real-time on an embedded computer installed on an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). In order to overcome the limitation of existing object detection architectures related to accuracy and computational overhead, a multi-task learning methodology was employed by adding a segmentation head to an object detector backbone resulting in the MultEYE object detection architecture. On a custom dataset, it achieved 4.8% higher mean Average Precision (mAP) score, while being 91.4% faster than the state-of-the-art model and while being able to generalize to different real-world traffic scenes. Dedicated object tracking and speed estimation algorithms have been then optimized to track reliably objects from an UAV with limited computational effort. Different strategies to combine object detection, tracking, and speed estimation are discussed, too. From our experiments, the optimized detector runs at an average frame-rate of up to 29 frames per second (FPS) on frame resolution 512 × 320 on a Nvidia Xavier NX board, while the optimally combined detector, tracker and speed estimator pipeline achieves speeds of up to 33 FPS on an image of resolution 3072 × 1728. To our knowledge, the MultEYE system is one of the first traffic monitoring systems that was specifically designed and optimized for an UAV platform under real-world constraints.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs13040573

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Modifying CSPDarknet53 by reducing and rearranging convolutional layers and CSP Bottleneck blocks resulted in a lighter version but decreased detection performance due to increased latent space related to Bottleneck blocks.

    “This resulted in a lighter version of CSPDarknet, which at the same time caused a decrease in detection performance due to the increased amount of latent space related to the Bottleneck blocks.”
  • The MultEYE (YOLOv4) achieves an AP of 83.40% on Aeroscapes + custom datasets.

    “[5] | MultEYE (YOLOv4) | CSPDarkNet53 Lite | Aeroscapes + custom datasets | 3072 × 1728 | 20m to 150m | Isometric views (Moving camera) | Nvidia Xavier NX board | Multi-class | 83.40 | --”
  • The MOSSE Tracker achieves a MOTA of 90.91% for real-time MOT tracking with high frame rates.

    “[5] | To achieve real-time MOT tracking with high frame rates | Filtering based | MOSSE Tracker | -- | 90.91 | 92.11 | --”
  • The MOSSE Tracker achieves a MOTP of 92.11% for real-time MOT tracking with high frame rates.

    “[5] | To achieve real-time MOT tracking with high frame rates | Filtering based | MOSSE Tracker | -- | 90.91 | 92.11 | --”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Balamuralidhar, N., Tilon, S., & Nex, F.
Affiliations
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (NL)
Corresponding author
Balamuralidhar, Navaneeth
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-02-05
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
573
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128053756
Cited by
104
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 9
FWCI
6.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Twente Research Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Innovation and Networks Executive Agency (769129)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Keywords
vehicle detection, vehicle tracking, velocity estimation, traffic monitoring, unmanned aerial vehicles, edge computing, multi-task learning, object detection, semantic segmentation, real-time processing, embedded systems, Jetson Xavier NX

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review