Cited by 139Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Fast Deep Vehicle Detection in Aerial Images

Open access
Sommer, Lars Wilko, Schuchert, Tobias, Beyerer, Jurgen·2017·2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Abstract

Vehicle detection in aerial images is a crucial image processing step for many applications like screening of large areas. In recent years, several deep learning based frameworks have been proposed for object detection. However, these detectors were developed for datasets that considerably differ from aerial images. In this paper, we systematically investigate the potential of Fast R-CNN and Faster R-CNN for aerial images, which achieve top performing results on common detection benchmark datasets. Therefore, the applicability of 8 state-of-the-art object proposals methods used to generate a set of candidate regions and of both detectors is examined. Relevant adaptations of the object proposals methods are provided. To overcome shortcomings of the original approach in case of handling small instances, we further propose our own network that clearly outperforms state-of-the-art methods for vehicle detection in aerial images. All experiments are performed on two publicly available datasets to account for differing characteristics such as ground sampling distance, number of objects per image and varying backgrounds.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/wacv.2017.41

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DYOLO outperformed Faster R-CNN, SSD, and YOLOv2 frameworks.

    “As a consequence, DY-OLO outperformed Faster Region-based CNN (Faster R-CNN) [84], SSD [82], and YOLOv2 [83] frameworks.”
  • In [75], with Faster R-CNN, low-level features were coupled with high-level features utilizing FPN to solve these difficulties.

    “Therefore, in [75], with the Faster R-CNN framework [84], low-level features were coupled with high-level features utilizing Feature Pyramid Networks (FPN) to solve these difficulties.”
  • Results of ISPDM increased over base YOLOv3, Faster R-CNN, and SSD frameworks.

    “Results increased over base YOLOv3 [25], Faster R-CNN [84] and SSD [82] frameworks.”
  • The Butterfly detector outperformed Faster R-CNN, CenterNet, and ClusDet frameworks while improved performance than YOLOv3, SSD, and GANet frameworks for UAVDT dataset.

    “The results demonstrated that this framework outperformed Faster R-CNN [84], CenterNet [85], and ClusDet [86] frameworks while improved performance than YOLOv3 [25], SSD [82], and Guided Attention Network (GANet) [87] frameworks for UAVDT dataset [45].”
  • [73] used Faster R-CNN and YOLOv3 to detect cars for traffic monitoring purpose.

    “Moreover, [73] used Faster R-CNN [84] and YOLOv3 [25] to detect cars for traffic monitoring purpose.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sommer, L. W., Schuchert, T., & Beyerer, J.
Affiliations
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE)
  • Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System Technologies and Image Exploitation (DE)
  • Fraunhofer IOSB, Karlsruhe, Germany
Venue
2017 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-03
Pages
311-319
ISSN
2472-6737 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2612465689
Cited by
139
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6
FWCI
4.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (publishedVersion)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
vehicle detection, aerial images, Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN, small object detection, aerial object detection, ground sampling distance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review