A Survey on Visual Navigation and Positioning for Autonomous UUVs
Open accessAbstract
Autonomous navigation and positioning are key to the successful performance of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) in environmental monitoring, oceanographic mapping, and critical marine infrastructure inspections in the sea. Cameras have been at the center of attention as an underwater sensor due to the advantages of low costs and rich content information in high visibility ocean waters, especially in the fields of underwater target recognition, navigation, and positioning. This paper is not only a literature overview of the vision-based navigation and positioning of autonomous UUVs but also critically evaluates the methodologies which have been developed and that directly affect such UUVs. In this paper, the visual navigation and positioning algorithms are divided into two categories: geometry-based methods and deep learning-based. In this paper, the two types of SOTA methods are compared experimentally and quantitatively using a public underwater dataset and their potentials and shortcomings are analyzed, providing a panoramic theoretical reference and technical scheme comparison for UUV visual navigation and positioning research in the highly dynamic and three-dimensional ocean environments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155 · see citing works
ORB-SLAM2: An Open-Source SLAM System for Monocular, Stereo, and RGB-D Cameras
Mur-Artal, R., & Tardos, J. D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2017.2705103 · Cited by 6,898 · see citing works
Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications
Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M. (2020) · AI Open · doi:10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001 · Cited by 6,880 · see citing works
ORB-SLAM: A Versatile and Accurate Monocular SLAM System
Mur-Artal, R., Montiel, J. M. M., & Tardos, J. D. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2015.2463671 · Cited by 6,778 · see citing works
VINS-Mono: A Robust and Versatile Monocular Visual-Inertial State Estimator
Qin, T., Li, P., & Shen, S. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2018.2853729 · Cited by 4,669 · see citing works
Parallel Tracking and Mapping for Small AR Workspaces
Klein, G., & Murray, D. (2007) · 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality · doi:10.1109/ismar.2007.4538852 · Cited by 4,346 · see citing works
MonoSLAM: Real-time single camera SLAM
Davison, A. J., Reid, I. D., Molton, N. D., & Stasse, O. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2007.1049 · Cited by 3,959 · see citing works
LSD-SLAM: Large-scale direct monocular SLAM
Engel, J., Schöps, T., & Cremers, D. (2014) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10605-2_54 · Cited by 3,851 · see citing works
DTAM: Dense tracking and mapping in real-time
Newcombe, R. A., Lovegrove, S. J., & Davison, A. J. (2011) · 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2011.6126513 · Cited by 2,078 · see citing works
Deepvo: towards end-to-end visual odometry with deep recurrent convolutional neural networks
Wang, S., Clark, R., Wen, H., & Trigoni, N. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) · doi:10.1109/icra.2017.7989236 · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Iterated extended Kalman filter based visual-inertial odometry using direct photometric feedback
Bloesch, M., Burri, M., Omari, S., Hutter, M., & Siegwart, R. (2017) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/0278364917728574 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Han, L., Lin, Y., Du, G., & Lian, S. (2019) · 2019 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros40897.2019.8968467 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 90
- Khawaja, W.; Semkin, V.; Ratyal, N.; Yaqoob, Q.; Gul, J. Threats from and Countermeasures for Unmanned Aerial and Underwater Vehicles. Sensors 2022, 22, 3896. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chemisky, B.; Nocerino, E.; Menna, F.; Nawaf, M.; Drap, P. A Portable Opto-Acoustic Survey Solution for Mapping of Underwater Targets. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, 43, 651-658. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gilson, C. The Future of Optical Sensors Will Enhance Navigation. Ocean. News Technol. Mag. 2021, 12, 12-13.
- Petillot, Y.R.; Antonelli, G.; Casalino, G.; Ferreira, F. Underwater robots: From remotely operated vehicles to intervention- autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2019, 26, 94-101. [CrossRef] · DOI
- He, Y.; Wang, D.; Ali, Z. A Review of Different Designs and Control Models of Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle. Meas. Control 2020, 53, 1561-1570. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Yoerger, D.; Govindarajan, A.; Howland, J.; Llopiz, J.; Wiebe, P.; Curran, M.; Fujii, J.; Gomez-Ibanez, D.; Katija, K.; Robison, B.; et al. A hybrid underwater robot for multidisciplinary investigation of the ocean twilight zone. Sci. Robot. 2021, 6, 1901-1912. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Vasilijević, A.; Na d, Ð.; Mandić, F.; Mišković, N.; Vukić, Z. Coordinated navigation of surface and underwater marine robotic vehicles for ocean sampling and environmental monitoring. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2017, 22, 1174-1184. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sun, K.; Cui, W.; Chen, C. Review of Underwater Sensing Technologies and Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 7849. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Burguera, B.A.; Bonin-Font, F. A Trajectory-Based Approach to Multi-Session Underwater Visual SLAM Using Global Image Signatures. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 278. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wu, Y.; Ta, X.; Xiao, R.; Wei, Y.; Li, D. Survey of Underwater Robot Positioning Navigation. Appl. Ocean Res. 2019, 90, 101845-101860. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Tan, H.P.; Diamant, R.; Seah, W.K.G.; Waldmeyer, M. A survey of techniques and challenges in underwater localization. Ocean Eng. 2011, 38, 1663-1676. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Toky, A.; Singh, R.; Das, S. Localization Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks-A Review. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2020, 37, 100241-100259. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ran, T.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, J. Scene perception based visual navigation of mobile robot in indoor environment. ISA Trans. 2021, 109, 389-400. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Zhang, J.; Ila, V.; Kneip, L. Robust visual odometry in underwater environment. In Proceedings of the OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO), Kobe, Japan, 28-31 May 2018.
- Nash, J.; Bond, J.; Case, M.; Mccarthy, I.; Teahan, W. Tracking the fine scale movements of fish using autonomous maritime robotics: A systematic state of the art review. Ocean Eng. 2021, 229, 108650-108671. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Liu, J.; Gong, S.; Guan, W.; Guan, W.; Li, B.; Li, H.; Liu, J. Tracking and Localization based on Multi-angle Vision for Underwater Target. Electronics 2020, 9, 1871. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kim, J. Cooperative localization and unknown currents estimation using multiple autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2020, 5, 2365-2371. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Plum, F.; Labisch, S.; Dirks, J.H. SAUV-A bio-inspired soft-robotic autonomous underwater vehicle. Front. Neurorobot. 2020, 14, 8. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lu, Y.; Xue, Z.; Xia, G.S.; Zhang, L. A survey on vision-based UAV navigation. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. 2018, 21, 21-32. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Guilherme, N.D.; Avinash, C.K. Vision for mobile robot navigation: A survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002, 24, 237-267.
- Nourani-Vatani, N.; Borges, P.V.K.; Roberts, J.M.; Srinivasan, M.V. On the use of optical flow for scene change detection and description. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2014, 74, 817-846. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Su, Y. Visual place recognition: A survey from deep learning perspective. Pattern Recognit. 2021, 113, 107760-107781. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Cho, D.M.; Tsiotras, P.; Zhang, G.; Marcus, J. Robust feature detection, acquisition and tracking for relative navigation in space with a known target. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 19-22 August 2013.
- Moravec, H.; Elfes, A. High resolution maps from wide angle sonar. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, MO, USA, 25 March 1985.
- Thoma, J.; Paudel, D.P.; Chhatkuli, A.; Probst, T.; Gool, L.V. Mapping, localization and path planning for image-based navigation using visual features and map. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 16-20 June 2019.
- Saputra, M.R.U.; Markham, A.; Trigoni, N. Visual SLAM and structure from motion in dynamic environments: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2018, 51, 1-36. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Yasuda, Y.D.V.; Martins, L.E.G.; Cappabianco, F.A.M. Autonomous visual navigation for mobile robots: A systematic literature review. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2020, 53, 1-34. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Paull, L.; Saeedi, S.; Seto, M.; Li, H. AUV navigation and localization: A review. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2013, 39, 131-149. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhou, Z.; Liu, J.; Yu, J. A Survey of Underwater Multi-Robot Systems. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2021, 9, 1-18. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Qin, J.; Yang, K.; Li, M.; Zhong, J.; Zhang, H. Real-time Positioning and Tracking for Vision-based Unmanned Underwater Vehicles. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2022, 46, 163-168. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Fuentes-Pacheco, J.; Ruiz-Ascencio, J.; Rendón-Mancha, J.M. Visual simultaneous localization and mapping: A survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2015, 43, 55-81. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Cadena, C.; Carlone, L.; Carrillo, H.; Latif, Y.; Scaramuzza, S.; Neira, J.; Reid, I.; Leonard, J.J. Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2016, 32, 1309-1332. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Chen, C.; Zhu, H.; Li, M.; You, S. A review of visual-inertial simultaneous localization and mapping from filtering-based and optimization-based perspectives. Robotics 2018, 7, 45. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Servières, M.; Renaudin, V.; Dupuis, A.; Antigny, N. Visual and visual-inertial SLAM: State of the art, classification, and experimental benchmarking. J. Sens. 2021, 2021, 2054828. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Macario, B.A.; Michel, M.; Moline, Y.; Corre, G.; Carrel, F. A Comprehensive Survey of Visual SLAM Algorithms. Robotics 2022, 11, 24. [CrossRef] · DOI
- González-García, J.; Gómez-Espinosa, A.; Cuan-Urquizo, E.; Garcia-Valdovinos, L.G.; Salgado-Jimenez, T.; Cabello, J.A.E. Autonomous underwater vehicles: Localization, navigation, and communication for collaborative missions. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1256. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Maurelli, F.; Krupiski, S.; Xiang, X.; Petillot, Y. AUV localisation: A review of passive and active techniques. Int. J. Intell. Robot. Appl. 2021, 6, 246-269. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Watson, S.; Duecker, D.A.; Groves, K. Localisation of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) in complex and confined environ- ments: A review. Sensors 2020, 20, 6203. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wirth, S.; Carrasco, P.L.N.; Codina, G.O. Visual odometry for autonomous underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE OCEANS-Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 10-14 June 2013.
- Bellavia, F.; Fanfani, M.; Colombo, C. Selective visual odometry for accurate AUV localization. Auton. Robot. 2017, 41, 133-143. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Choi, J.; Lee, Y.; Kim, T.; Jung, J.; Choi, H. Development of a ROV for visual inspection of harbor structures. In Proceedings of the IEEE Underwater Technology (UT), Busan, Korea, 21-24 February 2017.
- Xu, Z.; Haroutunian, M.; Murphy, A.J.; Neasham, J.; Norman, R. An Underwater Visual Navigation Method Based on Multiple ArUco Markers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1432. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Li, M.; Qin, J.; Li, D.; Chen, R.; Liao, X.; Guo, B. VNLSTM-PoseNet: A novel deep ConvNet for real-time 6-DOF camera relocalization in urban streets. Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci. 2021, 24, 422-437. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ferrera, M.; Moras, J.; Trouvé-Peloux, P.; Creuze, V. Real-time monocular visual odometry for turbid and dynamic underwater environments. Sensors 2019, 19, 687. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
- Taketomi, T.; Uchiyama, H.; Ikeda, S. Visual SLAM algorithms: A survey from 2010 to 2016. IPSJ Trans. Comput. Vis. Appl. 2017, 9, 16. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Azzam, R.; Taha, T.; Huang, S.; Zweiri, Y. Feature-based visual simultaneous localization and mapping: A survey. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 224. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bailey, T.; Nieto, J.; Guivant, J.; Stevens, M.; Nebot, E. Consistency of the EKF-SLAM algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, 9-15 October 2006.
- Yan, J.; Guorong, L.; Shenghua, L.; Zhou, L. A review on localization and mapping algorithm based on extended kalman filtering. Int. Forum Inf. Technol. Appl. 2009, 2, 435-440.
- Stentz, A.; Fox, D.; Montemerlo, M. FastSLAM: A factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem with unknown data association. In Proceedings of the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 28 July-1 August 2002.
- Engel, J.; Koltun, V.; Cremers, D. Direct sparse odometry. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017, 40, 611-625. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Forster, C.; Pizzoli, M.; Scaramuzza, D. SVO: Fast semi-direct monocular visual odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China, 31 May-5 June 2014.
- Zhao, Y.; Smith, J.S.; Vela, P.A. Good graph to optimize: Cost-effective, budget-aware bundle adjustment in visual SLAM. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2008.10123. · arXiv
- Ferrera, M.; Eudes, A.; Moras, J.; Sanfourche, M.; Besnerais, G.L. OV2SLAM: A Fully Online and Versatile Visual SLAM for Real-Time Applications. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2021, 6, 1399-1406. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhou, Y.; Gallego, G.; Shen, S. Event-based stereo visual odometry. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2021, 37, 1433-1450. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Koestler, L.; Yang, N.; Zeller, N.; Cremers, D. TANDEM: Tracking and Dense Mapping in Real-time using Deep Multi-view Stereo. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning, Auckland, New Zealand, 14-18 December 2022.
- Xu, Z.; Haroutunian, M.; Murphy, A.J.; Neasham, J.; Norman, R. An Integrated Visual Odometry System for Underwater Vehicles. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2020, 46, 848-863. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Jinyu, L.; Bangbang, Y.; Danpeng, C.; Wang, N.; Zhang, G.; Bao, H. Survey and evaluation of monocular visual-inertial SLAM algorithms for augmented reality. Virtual Real. Intell. Hardw. 2019, 1, 386-410. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Weiss, S.M. Vision Based Navigation for Micro Helicopters. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2012.
- Palézieux, N.; Nägeli, T.; Hilliges, O. Duo-VIO: Fast, light-weight, stereo inertial odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Korea, 9-14 October 2016.
- Mourikis, A.I.; Roumeliotis, S.I. A Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter for Vision-aided Inertial Navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Rome, Italy, 10-14 April 2007.
- Bloesch, M.; Omari, S.; Hutter, M.; Siegwart, R. Robust visual inertial odometry using a direct EKF-based approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 September-2 October 2015.
- Leutenegger, S.; Furgale, P.; Rabaud, V.; Chli, M.; Konolige, K.; Siegwart, R. Keyframe-based visual-inertial SLAM using nonlinear optimization. In Proceedings of the Robotis Science and Systems (RSS), Berlin, Germany, 24-28 June 2013.
- Leutenegger, S.; Lynen, S.; Bosse, M.; Siegwart, R.; Furgale, P. Keyframe-based visual-inertial odometry using nonlinear optimization. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2015, 34, 314-334. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mur-Artal, R.; Tardós, J.D. Visual-inertial monocular SLAM with map reuse. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2017, 2, 796-803. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Qin, T.; Pan, J.; Cao, S.; Shen, S. A general optimization-based framework for local odometry estimation with multiple sensors. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1901.03638. · arXiv
- Campos, C.; Elvira, R.; Rodríguez, J.J.G.; Montiel, J.M.M.; Tardos, J.D. ORB-SLAM3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual-inertial, and mul-timap SLAM. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2021, 37, 1874-1890. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Li, X.; Li, Y.; Örnek, E.P.; Lin, J.; Tombari, F. Co-planar parametrization for stereo-SLAM and visual-inertial odometry. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2020, 5, 6972-6979. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Xie, H.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, H. Hierarchical quadtree feature optical flow tracking based sparse pose-graph visual-inertial SLAM. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Online, 31 May-15 June 2020.
- Seiskari, O.; Rantalankila, P.; Kannala, J.; Ylilammi, J.; Rahtu, E.; Solin, A. HybVIO: Pushing the Limits of Real-time Visual-inertial Odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 4-8 January 2022.
- Rahman, S.; Li, A.Q.; Rekleitis, I. Sonar visual inertial SLAM of underwater structures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia, 21-25 May 2018.
- Rahman, S.; Li, A.Q.; Rekleitis, I. Svin2: An underwater SLAM system using sonar, visual, inertial, and depth sensor. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China, 4-8 November 2019.
- Rahman, S.; Li, A.Q.; Rekleitis, I. Contour based reconstruction of underwater structures using sonar, visual, inertial, and depth sensor. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China, 4-8 November 2019.
- Cebollada, S.; Payá, L.; Flores, M.; Peidro, A.; Reinoso, O. A state-of-the-art review on mobile robotics tasks using artificial intelligence and visual data. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 167, 114195. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sartipi, K.; Do, T.; Ke, T.; Vuong, K.; Roumeliotis, S.I. Deep depth estimation from visual-inertial SLAM. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 4 October 2020-24 January 2021.
- Duan, C.; Junginger, S.; Huang, J.; Jin, K.; Thurow, K. Deep learning for visual SLAM in transportation robotics: A review. Transp. Saf. Environ. 2019, 1, 177-184. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhao, C.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, C.; Tang, Y.; Qian, F. Monocular depth estimation based on deep learning: An overview. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2020, 63, 1612-1627. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ming, Y.; Meng, X.; Fan, C.; Yu, H. Deep learning for monocular depth estimation: A review. Neurocomputing 2021, 438, 14-33. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Arshad, S.; Kim, G.W. Role of deep learning in loop closure detection for visual and lidar SLAM: A survey. Sensors 2021, 21, 1243. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sualeh, M.; Kim, G.W. Simultaneous localization and mapping in the epoch of semantics: A survey. Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst. 2019, 17, 729-742. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kendall, A.; Grimes, M.; Cipolla, R. PoseNet: A convolutional network for real-time 6-dof camera relocalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile, 7-13 December 2015.
- Yi, K.M.; Trulls, E.; Lepetit, V.; Fua, P. Lift: Learned invariant feature transform. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8-16 October 2016.
- Li, D.; Shi, X.; Long, Q.; Liu, S.; Yang, W.; Wang, F.; Wei, Q.; Qiao, F. DXSLAM: A robust and efficient visual SLAM system with deep features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 4 October 2020-24 January 2021.
- Tateno, K.; Tombari, F.; Laina, I.; Navab, N. CNN-SLAM: Real-time dense monocular SLAM with learned depth prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21-26 July 2017.
- Li, R.; Wang, S.; Long, Z.; Gu, D. UnDeepVo: Monocular visual odometry through unsupervised deep learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia, 21-25 May 2018.
- Kim, J.J.Y.; Urschler, M.; Riddle, P.J.; Wicker, J.S. SymbioLCD: Ensemble-Based Loop Closure Detection using CNN-Extracted Objects and Visual Bag-of-Words. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic, 27 September-1 October 2021.
- Bescos, B.; Fácil, J.M.; Civera, J.; Neira, J. DynaSLAM: Tracking, mapping, and inpainting in dynamic scenes. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2018, 3, 4076-4083. [CrossRef] 100. Liu, Y.; Miura, J. RDS-SLAM: Real-time dynamic SLAM using semantic segmentation methods. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 23772-23785. [CrossRef] 101 · DOI
- Walch, F.; Hazirbas, C.; Leal-Taixe, L.; Sattler, T.; Hilsenbeck, S.; Cremers, D. Image-based localization using LSTMs for structured feature correlation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 22-29 October 2017. 105. Xue, F.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Dong, W.; Wang, J.; Zha, H. Guided feature selection for deep visual odometry. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia, 2-6 December 2018. 106. Chancán, M.; Milford, M. DeepSeqSLAM: A trainable CNN+ RNN for joint global description and sequence-based place recognition. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2011.08518. 107. · arXiv
- Sarlin, P.E.; DeTone, D.; Malisiewicz, T.; Rabinovich, A. SuperGlue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 16-18 June 2020. 118. Taherkhani, A.; Belatreche, A.; Li, Y.; Cosma, G.; Maguire, L.P.; McGinnity, T.M. A review of learning in biologically plausible spiking neural networks. Neural Netw. 2020, 122, 253-272. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 119. Milford, M.J.; Wyeth, G.F.; Prasser, D. RatSLAM: A hippocampal model for simultaneous localization and mapping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), New Orleans, LA, USA, 26 April-1 May 2004. 120. · DOI
- Ball, D.; Heath, S.; Wiles, J.; Wyeth, G.; Corke, P.; Milford, M. OpenRatSLAM: An open source brain-based SLAM system. Auton. Robot. 2013, 34, 149-176. [CrossRef] 121. Silveira, L.; Guth, F.; Drews-Jr, P.; Ballester, P.; Machado, M.; Codevilla, F.; Duarte-Filho, N.; Botelho, S. An open-source bio-inspired solution to underwater SLAM. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 212-217. [CrossRef] 122. Yu, F.; Shang, J.; Hu, Y.; Milford, M. NeuroSLAM: A brain-inspired SLAM system for 3D environments. Biol. Cybern. 2019, 113, 515-545. [CrossRef] 123. Qin, J. Visual-Navigation-and-Positioning. Available online: https://github.com/qinjiangying/visual-navigation-and- positioning (accessed on 30 May 2022). 124. · DOI
- Ferrera, M.; Creuze, V.; Moras, J.; Trouve-Peloux, P. AQUALOC: An underwater dataset for visual-inertial-pressure localization. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2019, 38, 1549-1559. [CrossRef · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transformer-Based Model for Monocular Visual Odometry: A Video Understanding Approach
Françani, A. O., & Maximo, M. R. O. A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.06121 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
“In this case, researchers usually refer to visual-inertial odometry (VIO), where the image information is combined with an IMU sensor to estimate the poses with high precision [25].”
Background
- Authors
- Qin, J., Li, M., Li, D., Zhong, J., & Yang, K.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University (CN)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Ming
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-08-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3794
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4290755992
- Cited by
- 65
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 6.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB0505400, 41901407, S202210486307)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (2018YFB0505400, 41901407, S202210486307)
- the College Students’ Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Plan Program (2018YFB0505400, 41901407, S202210486307)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Maritime Navigation and Safety
- Keywords
- unmanned underwater vehicles, visual navigation, underwater localization, visual localization, underwater camera, autonomous underwater vehicles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review