Cited by 65Underwater Vehicles and Communication SystemsRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationMaritime Navigation and Safety

A Survey on Visual Navigation and Positioning for Autonomous UUVs

Open access
Qin, Jiangying, Li, Ming, Li, Deren, Zhong, Jiageng, Yang, Ke·2022·Remote Sensing

Abstract

Autonomous navigation and positioning are key to the successful performance of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) in environmental monitoring, oceanographic mapping, and critical marine infrastructure inspections in the sea. Cameras have been at the center of attention as an underwater sensor due to the advantages of low costs and rich content information in high visibility ocean waters, especially in the fields of underwater target recognition, navigation, and positioning. This paper is not only a literature overview of the vision-based navigation and positioning of autonomous UUVs but also critically evaluates the methodologies which have been developed and that directly affect such UUVs. In this paper, the visual navigation and positioning algorithms are divided into two categories: geometry-based methods and deep learning-based. In this paper, the two types of SOTA methods are compared experimentally and quantitatively using a public underwater dataset and their potentials and shortcomings are analyzed, providing a panoramic theoretical reference and technical scheme comparison for UUV visual navigation and positioning research in the highly dynamic and three-dimensional ocean environments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/rs14153794

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 90

  1. Khawaja, W.; Semkin, V.; Ratyal, N.; Yaqoob, Q.; Gul, J. Threats from and Countermeasures for Unmanned Aerial and Underwater Vehicles. Sensors 2022, 22, 3896. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Chemisky, B.; Nocerino, E.; Menna, F.; Nawaf, M.; Drap, P. A Portable Opto-Acoustic Survey Solution for Mapping of Underwater Targets. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2021, 43, 651-658. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Gilson, C. The Future of Optical Sensors Will Enhance Navigation. Ocean. News Technol. Mag. 2021, 12, 12-13.
  4. Petillot, Y.R.; Antonelli, G.; Casalino, G.; Ferreira, F. Underwater robots: From remotely operated vehicles to intervention- autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2019, 26, 94-101. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. He, Y.; Wang, D.; Ali, Z. A Review of Different Designs and Control Models of Remotely Operated Underwater Vehicle. Meas. Control 2020, 53, 1561-1570. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Yoerger, D.; Govindarajan, A.; Howland, J.; Llopiz, J.; Wiebe, P.; Curran, M.; Fujii, J.; Gomez-Ibanez, D.; Katija, K.; Robison, B.; et al. A hybrid underwater robot for multidisciplinary investigation of the ocean twilight zone. Sci. Robot. 2021, 6, 1901-1912. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  7. Vasilijević, A.; Na d, Ð.; Mandić, F.; Mišković, N.; Vukić, Z. Coordinated navigation of surface and underwater marine robotic vehicles for ocean sampling and environmental monitoring. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatron. 2017, 22, 1174-1184. [CrossRef] · DOI
  8. Sun, K.; Cui, W.; Chen, C. Review of Underwater Sensing Technologies and Applications. Sensors 2021, 21, 7849. [CrossRef] · DOI
  9. Burguera, B.A.; Bonin-Font, F. A Trajectory-Based Approach to Multi-Session Underwater Visual SLAM Using Global Image Signatures. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2019, 7, 278. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Wu, Y.; Ta, X.; Xiao, R.; Wei, Y.; Li, D. Survey of Underwater Robot Positioning Navigation. Appl. Ocean Res. 2019, 90, 101845-101860. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Tan, H.P.; Diamant, R.; Seah, W.K.G.; Waldmeyer, M. A survey of techniques and challenges in underwater localization. Ocean Eng. 2011, 38, 1663-1676. [CrossRef] · DOI
  12. Toky, A.; Singh, R.; Das, S. Localization Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks-A Review. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2020, 37, 100241-100259. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Ran, T.; Yuan, L.; Zhang, J. Scene perception based visual navigation of mobile robot in indoor environment. ISA Trans. 2021, 109, 389-400. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  14. Zhang, J.; Ila, V.; Kneip, L. Robust visual odometry in underwater environment. In Proceedings of the OCEANS-MTS/IEEE Kobe Techno-Oceans (OTO), Kobe, Japan, 28-31 May 2018.
  15. Nash, J.; Bond, J.; Case, M.; Mccarthy, I.; Teahan, W. Tracking the fine scale movements of fish using autonomous maritime robotics: A systematic state of the art review. Ocean Eng. 2021, 229, 108650-108671. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Liu, J.; Gong, S.; Guan, W.; Guan, W.; Li, B.; Li, H.; Liu, J. Tracking and Localization based on Multi-angle Vision for Underwater Target. Electronics 2020, 9, 1871. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Kim, J. Cooperative localization and unknown currents estimation using multiple autonomous underwater vehicles. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2020, 5, 2365-2371. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Plum, F.; Labisch, S.; Dirks, J.H. SAUV-A bio-inspired soft-robotic autonomous underwater vehicle. Front. Neurorobot. 2020, 14, 8. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Lu, Y.; Xue, Z.; Xia, G.S.; Zhang, L. A survey on vision-based UAV navigation. Geo-Spat. Inf. Sci. 2018, 21, 21-32. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Guilherme, N.D.; Avinash, C.K. Vision for mobile robot navigation: A survey. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2002, 24, 237-267.
  21. Nourani-Vatani, N.; Borges, P.V.K.; Roberts, J.M.; Srinivasan, M.V. On the use of optical flow for scene change detection and description. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2014, 74, 817-846. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Zhang, X.; Wang, L.; Su, Y. Visual place recognition: A survey from deep learning perspective. Pattern Recognit. 2021, 113, 107760-107781. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Cho, D.M.; Tsiotras, P.; Zhang, G.; Marcus, J. Robust feature detection, acquisition and tracking for relative navigation in space with a known target. In Proceedings of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 19-22 August 2013.
  24. Moravec, H.; Elfes, A. High resolution maps from wide angle sonar. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, St. Louis, MO, USA, 25 March 1985.
  25. Thoma, J.; Paudel, D.P.; Chhatkuli, A.; Probst, T.; Gool, L.V. Mapping, localization and path planning for image-based navigation using visual features and map. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 16-20 June 2019.
  26. Saputra, M.R.U.; Markham, A.; Trigoni, N. Visual SLAM and structure from motion in dynamic environments: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2018, 51, 1-36. [CrossRef] · DOI
  27. Yasuda, Y.D.V.; Martins, L.E.G.; Cappabianco, F.A.M. Autonomous visual navigation for mobile robots: A systematic literature review. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2020, 53, 1-34. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Paull, L.; Saeedi, S.; Seto, M.; Li, H. AUV navigation and localization: A review. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2013, 39, 131-149. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Zhou, Z.; Liu, J.; Yu, J. A Survey of Underwater Multi-Robot Systems. IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sin. 2021, 9, 1-18. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Qin, J.; Yang, K.; Li, M.; Zhong, J.; Zhang, H. Real-time Positioning and Tracking for Vision-based Unmanned Underwater Vehicles. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2022, 46, 163-168. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Fuentes-Pacheco, J.; Ruiz-Ascencio, J.; Rendón-Mancha, J.M. Visual simultaneous localization and mapping: A survey. Artif. Intell. Rev. 2015, 43, 55-81. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  32. Cadena, C.; Carlone, L.; Carrillo, H.; Latif, Y.; Scaramuzza, S.; Neira, J.; Reid, I.; Leonard, J.J. Past, present, and future of simultaneous localization and mapping: Toward the robust-perception age. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2016, 32, 1309-1332. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  33. Chen, C.; Zhu, H.; Li, M.; You, S. A review of visual-inertial simultaneous localization and mapping from filtering-based and optimization-based perspectives. Robotics 2018, 7, 45. [CrossRef] · DOI
  34. Servières, M.; Renaudin, V.; Dupuis, A.; Antigny, N. Visual and visual-inertial SLAM: State of the art, classification, and experimental benchmarking. J. Sens. 2021, 2021, 2054828. [CrossRef] · DOI
  35. Macario, B.A.; Michel, M.; Moline, Y.; Corre, G.; Carrel, F. A Comprehensive Survey of Visual SLAM Algorithms. Robotics 2022, 11, 24. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. González-García, J.; Gómez-Espinosa, A.; Cuan-Urquizo, E.; Garcia-Valdovinos, L.G.; Salgado-Jimenez, T.; Cabello, J.A.E. Autonomous underwater vehicles: Localization, navigation, and communication for collaborative missions. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 1256. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Maurelli, F.; Krupiski, S.; Xiang, X.; Petillot, Y. AUV localisation: A review of passive and active techniques. Int. J. Intell. Robot. Appl. 2021, 6, 246-269. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Watson, S.; Duecker, D.A.; Groves, K. Localisation of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) in complex and confined environ- ments: A review. Sensors 2020, 20, 6203. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Wirth, S.; Carrasco, P.L.N.; Codina, G.O. Visual odometry for autonomous underwater vehicles. In Proceedings of the MTS/IEEE OCEANS-Bergen, Bergen, Norway, 10-14 June 2013.
  40. Bellavia, F.; Fanfani, M.; Colombo, C. Selective visual odometry for accurate AUV localization. Auton. Robot. 2017, 41, 133-143. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Choi, J.; Lee, Y.; Kim, T.; Jung, J.; Choi, H. Development of a ROV for visual inspection of harbor structures. In Proceedings of the IEEE Underwater Technology (UT), Busan, Korea, 21-24 February 2017.
  42. Xu, Z.; Haroutunian, M.; Murphy, A.J.; Neasham, J.; Norman, R. An Underwater Visual Navigation Method Based on Multiple ArUco Markers. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 1432. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Li, M.; Qin, J.; Li, D.; Chen, R.; Liao, X.; Guo, B. VNLSTM-PoseNet: A novel deep ConvNet for real-time 6-DOF camera relocalization in urban streets. Geo-Spatial Inf. Sci. 2021, 24, 422-437. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Ferrera, M.; Moras, J.; Trouvé-Peloux, P.; Creuze, V. Real-time monocular visual odometry for turbid and dynamic underwater environments. Sensors 2019, 19, 687. [CrossRef] [PubMed] · DOI
  45. Taketomi, T.; Uchiyama, H.; Ikeda, S. Visual SLAM algorithms: A survey from 2010 to 2016. IPSJ Trans. Comput. Vis. Appl. 2017, 9, 16. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Azzam, R.; Taha, T.; Huang, S.; Zweiri, Y. Feature-based visual simultaneous localization and mapping: A survey. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 224. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Bailey, T.; Nieto, J.; Guivant, J.; Stevens, M.; Nebot, E. Consistency of the EKF-SLAM algorithm. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing, China, 9-15 October 2006.
  48. Yan, J.; Guorong, L.; Shenghua, L.; Zhou, L. A review on localization and mapping algorithm based on extended kalman filtering. Int. Forum Inf. Technol. Appl. 2009, 2, 435-440.
  49. Stentz, A.; Fox, D.; Montemerlo, M. FastSLAM: A factored solution to the simultaneous localization and mapping problem with unknown data association. In Proceedings of the AAAI National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 28 July-1 August 2002.
  50. Engel, J.; Koltun, V.; Cremers, D. Direct sparse odometry. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2017, 40, 611-625. [CrossRef] · DOI
  51. Forster, C.; Pizzoli, M.; Scaramuzza, D. SVO: Fast semi-direct monocular visual odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Hong Kong, China, 31 May-5 June 2014.
  52. Zhao, Y.; Smith, J.S.; Vela, P.A. Good graph to optimize: Cost-effective, budget-aware bundle adjustment in visual SLAM. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2008.10123. · arXiv
  53. Ferrera, M.; Eudes, A.; Moras, J.; Sanfourche, M.; Besnerais, G.L. OV2SLAM: A Fully Online and Versatile Visual SLAM for Real-Time Applications. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2021, 6, 1399-1406. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Zhou, Y.; Gallego, G.; Shen, S. Event-based stereo visual odometry. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2021, 37, 1433-1450. [CrossRef] · DOI
  55. Koestler, L.; Yang, N.; Zeller, N.; Cremers, D. TANDEM: Tracking and Dense Mapping in Real-time using Deep Multi-view Stereo. In Proceedings of the Conference on Robot Learning, Auckland, New Zealand, 14-18 December 2022.
  56. Xu, Z.; Haroutunian, M.; Murphy, A.J.; Neasham, J.; Norman, R. An Integrated Visual Odometry System for Underwater Vehicles. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 2020, 46, 848-863. [CrossRef] · DOI
  57. Jinyu, L.; Bangbang, Y.; Danpeng, C.; Wang, N.; Zhang, G.; Bao, H. Survey and evaluation of monocular visual-inertial SLAM algorithms for augmented reality. Virtual Real. Intell. Hardw. 2019, 1, 386-410. [CrossRef] · DOI
  58. Weiss, S.M. Vision Based Navigation for Micro Helicopters. Ph.D. Thesis, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland, 2012.
  59. Palézieux, N.; Nägeli, T.; Hilliges, O. Duo-VIO: Fast, light-weight, stereo inertial odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Daejeon, Korea, 9-14 October 2016.
  60. Mourikis, A.I.; Roumeliotis, S.I. A Multi-State Constraint Kalman Filter for Vision-aided Inertial Navigation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Rome, Italy, 10-14 April 2007.
  61. Bloesch, M.; Omari, S.; Hutter, M.; Siegwart, R. Robust visual inertial odometry using a direct EKF-based approach. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany, 28 September-2 October 2015.
  62. Leutenegger, S.; Furgale, P.; Rabaud, V.; Chli, M.; Konolige, K.; Siegwart, R. Keyframe-based visual-inertial SLAM using nonlinear optimization. In Proceedings of the Robotis Science and Systems (RSS), Berlin, Germany, 24-28 June 2013.
  63. Leutenegger, S.; Lynen, S.; Bosse, M.; Siegwart, R.; Furgale, P. Keyframe-based visual-inertial odometry using nonlinear optimization. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2015, 34, 314-334. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. Mur-Artal, R.; Tardós, J.D. Visual-inertial monocular SLAM with map reuse. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2017, 2, 796-803. [CrossRef] · DOI
  65. Qin, T.; Pan, J.; Cao, S.; Shen, S. A general optimization-based framework for local odometry estimation with multiple sensors. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1901.03638. · arXiv
  66. Campos, C.; Elvira, R.; Rodríguez, J.J.G.; Montiel, J.M.M.; Tardos, J.D. ORB-SLAM3: An accurate open-source library for visual, visual-inertial, and mul-timap SLAM. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2021, 37, 1874-1890. [CrossRef] · DOI
  67. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Örnek, E.P.; Lin, J.; Tombari, F. Co-planar parametrization for stereo-SLAM and visual-inertial odometry. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2020, 5, 6972-6979. [CrossRef] · DOI
  68. Xie, H.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, H. Hierarchical quadtree feature optical flow tracking based sparse pose-graph visual-inertial SLAM. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Online, 31 May-15 June 2020.
  69. Seiskari, O.; Rantalankila, P.; Kannala, J.; Ylilammi, J.; Rahtu, E.; Solin, A. HybVIO: Pushing the Limits of Real-time Visual-inertial Odometry. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 4-8 January 2022.
  70. Rahman, S.; Li, A.Q.; Rekleitis, I. Sonar visual inertial SLAM of underwater structures. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia, 21-25 May 2018.
  71. Rahman, S.; Li, A.Q.; Rekleitis, I. Svin2: An underwater SLAM system using sonar, visual, inertial, and depth sensor. In Proceed- ings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China, 4-8 November 2019.
  72. Rahman, S.; Li, A.Q.; Rekleitis, I. Contour based reconstruction of underwater structures using sonar, visual, inertial, and depth sensor. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Macau, China, 4-8 November 2019.
  73. Cebollada, S.; Payá, L.; Flores, M.; Peidro, A.; Reinoso, O. A state-of-the-art review on mobile robotics tasks using artificial intelligence and visual data. Expert Syst. Appl. 2021, 167, 114195. [CrossRef] · DOI
  74. Sartipi, K.; Do, T.; Ke, T.; Vuong, K.; Roumeliotis, S.I. Deep depth estimation from visual-inertial SLAM. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 4 October 2020-24 January 2021.
  75. Duan, C.; Junginger, S.; Huang, J.; Jin, K.; Thurow, K. Deep learning for visual SLAM in transportation robotics: A review. Transp. Saf. Environ. 2019, 1, 177-184. [CrossRef] · DOI
  76. Zhao, C.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, C.; Tang, Y.; Qian, F. Monocular depth estimation based on deep learning: An overview. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2020, 63, 1612-1627. [CrossRef] · DOI
  77. Ming, Y.; Meng, X.; Fan, C.; Yu, H. Deep learning for monocular depth estimation: A review. Neurocomputing 2021, 438, 14-33. [CrossRef] · DOI
  78. Arshad, S.; Kim, G.W. Role of deep learning in loop closure detection for visual and lidar SLAM: A survey. Sensors 2021, 21, 1243. [CrossRef] · DOI
  79. Sualeh, M.; Kim, G.W. Simultaneous localization and mapping in the epoch of semantics: A survey. Int. J. Control. Autom. Syst. 2019, 17, 729-742. [CrossRef] · DOI
  80. Kendall, A.; Grimes, M.; Cipolla, R. PoseNet: A convolutional network for real-time 6-dof camera relocalization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Santiago, Chile, 7-13 December 2015.
  81. Yi, K.M.; Trulls, E.; Lepetit, V.; Fua, P. Lift: Learned invariant feature transform. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 8-16 October 2016.
  82. Li, D.; Shi, X.; Long, Q.; Liu, S.; Yang, W.; Wang, F.; Wei, Q.; Qiao, F. DXSLAM: A robust and efficient visual SLAM system with deep features. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 4 October 2020-24 January 2021.
  83. Tateno, K.; Tombari, F.; Laina, I.; Navab, N. CNN-SLAM: Real-time dense monocular SLAM with learned depth prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA, 21-26 July 2017.
  84. Li, R.; Wang, S.; Long, Z.; Gu, D. UnDeepVo: Monocular visual odometry through unsupervised deep learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, Australia, 21-25 May 2018.
  85. Kim, J.J.Y.; Urschler, M.; Riddle, P.J.; Wicker, J.S. SymbioLCD: Ensemble-Based Loop Closure Detection using CNN-Extracted Objects and Visual Bag-of-Words. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic, 27 September-1 October 2021.
  86. Bescos, B.; Fácil, J.M.; Civera, J.; Neira, J. DynaSLAM: Tracking, mapping, and inpainting in dynamic scenes. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2018, 3, 4076-4083. [CrossRef] 100. Liu, Y.; Miura, J. RDS-SLAM: Real-time dynamic SLAM using semantic segmentation methods. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 23772-23785. [CrossRef] 101 · DOI
  87. Walch, F.; Hazirbas, C.; Leal-Taixe, L.; Sattler, T.; Hilsenbeck, S.; Cremers, D. Image-based localization using LSTMs for structured feature correlation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Venice, Italy, 22-29 October 2017. 105. Xue, F.; Wang, Q.; Wang, X.; Dong, W.; Wang, J.; Zha, H. Guided feature selection for deep visual odometry. In Proceedings of the Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Perth, Australia, 2-6 December 2018. 106. Chancán, M.; Milford, M. DeepSeqSLAM: A trainable CNN+ RNN for joint global description and sequence-based place recognition. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2011.08518. 107. · arXiv
  88. Sarlin, P.E.; DeTone, D.; Malisiewicz, T.; Rabinovich, A. SuperGlue: Learning feature matching with graph neural networks. In Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Seattle, WA, USA, 16-18 June 2020. 118. Taherkhani, A.; Belatreche, A.; Li, Y.; Cosma, G.; Maguire, L.P.; McGinnity, T.M. A review of learning in biologically plausible spiking neural networks. Neural Netw. 2020, 122, 253-272. [CrossRef] [PubMed] 119. Milford, M.J.; Wyeth, G.F.; Prasser, D. RatSLAM: A hippocampal model for simultaneous localization and mapping. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), New Orleans, LA, USA, 26 April-1 May 2004. 120. · DOI
  89. Ball, D.; Heath, S.; Wiles, J.; Wyeth, G.; Corke, P.; Milford, M. OpenRatSLAM: An open source brain-based SLAM system. Auton. Robot. 2013, 34, 149-176. [CrossRef] 121. Silveira, L.; Guth, F.; Drews-Jr, P.; Ballester, P.; Machado, M.; Codevilla, F.; Duarte-Filho, N.; Botelho, S. An open-source bio-inspired solution to underwater SLAM. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2015, 48, 212-217. [CrossRef] 122. Yu, F.; Shang, J.; Hu, Y.; Milford, M. NeuroSLAM: A brain-inspired SLAM system for 3D environments. Biol. Cybern. 2019, 113, 515-545. [CrossRef] 123. Qin, J. Visual-Navigation-and-Positioning. Available online: https://github.com/qinjiangying/visual-navigation-and- positioning (accessed on 30 May 2022). 124. · DOI
  90. Ferrera, M.; Creuze, V.; Moras, J.; Trouve-Peloux, P. AQUALOC: An underwater dataset for visual-inertial-pressure localization. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2019, 38, 1549-1559. [CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qin, J., Li, M., Li, D., Zhong, J., & Yang, K.
Affiliations
  • Wuhan University (CN)
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Li, Ming
Venue
Remote Sensing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-06
Volume
14
Issue
15
Pages
3794
ISSN
2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4290755992
Cited by
65
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 1
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Remote Sensing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB0505400, 41901407, S202210486307)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (2018YFB0505400, 41901407, S202210486307)
  • the College Students’ Innovative Entrepreneurial Training Plan Program (2018YFB0505400, 41901407, S202210486307)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Underwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Maritime Navigation and Safety
Keywords
unmanned underwater vehicles, visual navigation, underwater localization, visual localization, underwater camera, autonomous underwater vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review