The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rapid Damage Assessment by Means of Multi-Temporal SAR — A Comprehensive Review and Outlook to Sentinel-1
Open accessAbstract
Fast crisis response after natural disasters, such as earthquakes and tropical storms, is necessary to support, for instance, rescue, humanitarian, and reconstruction operations in the crisis area. Therefore, rapid damage mapping after a disaster is crucial, i.e., to detect the affected area, including grade and type of damage. Thereby, satellite remote sensing plays a key role due to its fast response, wide field of view, and low cost. With the increasing availability of remote sensing data, numerous methods have been developed for damage assessment. This article gives a comprehensive review of these techniques focusing on multi-temporal SAR procedures for rapid damage assessment: interferometric coherence and intensity correlation. The review is divided into six parts: First, methods based on coherence; second, the ones using intensity correlation; and third, techniques using both methodologies combined to increase the accuracy of the damage assessment are reviewed. Next, studies using additional data (e.g., GIS and optical imagery) to support the damage assessment and increase its accuracy are reported. Moreover, selected studies on post-event SAR damage assessment techniques and examples of other applications of the interferometric coherence are presented. Then, the preconditions for a successful worldwide application of multi-temporal SAR methods for damage assessment and the limitations of current SAR satellite missions are reported. Finally, an outlook to the Sentinel-1 SAR mission shows possible solutions of these limitations, enabling a worldwide applicability of the presented damage assessment methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lu, D., Mausel, P., Brondízio, E., & Moran, E. (2004) · International Journal of Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/0143116031000139863 · Cited by 3,226
A tutorial on synthetic aperture radar
Moreira, A., Prats-Iraola, P., Younis, M., Krieger, G., Hajnsek, I., & Papathanassiou, K. P. (2013) · IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine · doi:10.1109/mgrs.2013.2248301 · Cited by 2,829
Synthetic aperture radar interferometry
Rosen, P. A., Hensley, S., Joughin, I. R., Li, F. K., Madsen, S. N., Rodriguez, E., & Goldstein, R. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.838084 · Cited by 2,670
Radar interferometry and its application to changes in the Earth's surface
Massonnet, D., & Feigl, K. L. (1998) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/97rg03139 · Cited by 2,624
Decorrelation in interferometric radar echoes
Zebker, H. A., & Villasenor, J. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1109/36.175330 · Cited by 2,453
Changes in Climate Extremes and their Impacts on the Natural Physical Environment
Seneviratne, S. I., Nicholls, N., Easterling, D., Goodess, C. M., Kanae, S., Kossin, J., Luo, Y., Marengo, J., McInnes, K., Rahimi, M., et al. (2012) · Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139177245.006 · Cited by 2,399
Torres, R., Snoeij, P., Geudtner, D., Bibby, D., Davidson, M., Attema, E., Potin, P., Rommen, B., Floury, N., Brown, M., et al. (2012) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.028 · Cited by 2,235
The displacement field of the Landers earthquake mapped by radar interferometry
Massonnet, D., Rossi, M., Carmona, C., Adragna, F., Peltzer, G., Feigl, K., & Rabaute, T. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/364138a0 · Cited by 2,207
Synthetic aperture radar interferometry
Bamler, R., & Hartl, P. (1998) · Inverse Problems · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/14/4/001 · Cited by 2,099
Cited by
Zheng, Z., Zhong, Y., Wang, J., Ma, A., & Zhang, L. (2021) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2021.112636 · Cited by 521
Big Data in Natural Disaster Management: A Review
Yu, M., Yang, C., & Li, Y. (2018) · Geosciences · doi:10.3390/geosciences8050165 · Cited by 447
Landslide failures detection and mapping using Synthetic Aperture Radar: Past, present and future
Mondini, A. C., Guzzetti, F., Chang, K.-T., Monserrat, O., Martha, T. R., & Manconi, A. (2021) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2021.103574 · Cited by 303
Metadata
- Authors
- Plank, S.
- Venue
- Remote Sensing
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2014-05-28
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 4870-4906
- ISSN
- 2072-4292 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971444184
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 15.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid Damage Assessment by Means of Multi-Temporal SAR — A Comprehensive Review and Outlook to Sentinel-1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/rs6064870
- The paper
- Plank, S. (2014). Rapid Damage Assessment by Means of Multi-Temporal SAR — A Comprehensive Review and Outlook to Sentinel-1. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6064870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.