Cited by 188Reliability and Maintenance OptimizationMachine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesSensor Technology and Measurement Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensor Systems for Prognostics and Health Management

Open access

Abstract

Prognostics and health management (PHM) is an enabling discipline consisting of technologies and methods to assess the reliability of a product in its actual life cycle conditions to determine the advent of failure and mitigate system risk. Sensor systems are needed for PHM to monitor environmental, operational, and performance-related characteristics. The gathered data can be analyzed to assess product health and predict remaining life. In this paper, the considerations for sensor system selection for PHM applications, including the parameters to be measured, the performance needs, the electrical and physical attributes, reliability, and cost of the sensor system, are discussed. The state-of-the-art sensor systems for PHM and the emerging trends in technologies of sensor systems for PHM are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s100605774

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. An example of PHM application for an automobile [15].
Figure 1. An example of PHM application for an automobile [15].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Integrated sensor system for PHM [17].
Figure 2. Integrated sensor system for PHM [17].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3. Flowchart of FMMEA process [18,19].
Figure 3. Flowchart of FMMEA process [18,19].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4. Schematic figure of PME-based MLCC [21].
Figure 4. Schematic figure of PME-based MLCC [21].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5. ePrognostic sensor system [17].
Figure 5. ePrognostic sensor system [17].CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6. Example of sensing location [36] (Sensor card is put in the express card slot of a laptop).
Figure 6. Example of sensing location [36] (Sensor card is put in the express card slot of a laptop).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. (2004). Defense Acquisition Guidebook, Defense Acquisition University. Chapter 5.3.
  2. (2003). IEEE Standard 1413.1-2002—IEEE Guide for Selecting and Using Reliability Predictions Based on IEEE 1413, IEEE.
  3. RFID Journal Available online: http://www.rfidjournal.com/faq/17 and http://www.rfidjournal.com/faq/18/ (accessed on 22 July 2009).
  4. O’Hara, B., and Petrick, A. (2004). IEEE 802.11 Handbook: A Designer’s Companion, IEEE Press.
  5. STMicroelectronics STMicroelectronics Unveils Ultra-Low-Power Technology Platform for 8-Bit and 32-Bit Microcontrollers, Enabling Next-Generation Power-Saving Products. Available online: http://www.st.com/stonline/stappl/cms/press/news/year2009/p2389.htm/ (accessed on 20 July 2009).
  6. Akyildiz, 2002, Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey, Comput. Netw, 4, 393, 10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–186 of 186

Metadata

Authors
Cheng, S., Azarian, M. H., & Pecht, M. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Pecht, Michael G.
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2010-06-08
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
5774-5797
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2149823865
Cited by
188
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 18
FWCI
6.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • CityU Scholars (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Reliability and Maintenance Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
Keywords
prognostics and health management, sensor systems, sensor selection, remaining useful life prediction, product reliability, fault detection, sensor reliability, sensor cost, condition monitoring
MeSH terms
Computer Communication Networks, Health, Humans, Models, Biological, Monitoring, Physiologic, Prognosis, Biosensing Techniques, Delivery of Health Care, Integrated, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review