Cited by 10Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare

Leg edema quantification for heart failure patients via 3D imaging

Open access
Hayn, Dieter, Fruhwald, Friedrich, Riedel, Arthur, Falgenhauer, Markus, Schreier, Günter·2013·Sensors

Abstract

Heart failure is a common cardiac disease in elderly patients. After discharge, approximately 50% of all patients are readmitted to a hospital within six months. Recent studies show that home monitoring of heart failure patients can reduce the number of readmissions. Still, a large number of false positive alarms as well as underdiagnoses in other cases require more accurate alarm generation algorithms. New low-cost sensors for leg edema detection could be the missing link to help home monitoring to its breakthrough. We evaluated a 3D camera-based measurement setup in order to geometrically detect and quantify leg edemas. 3D images of legs were taken and geometric parameters were extracted semi-automatically from the images. Intra-subject variability for five healthy subjects was evaluated. Thereafter, correlation of 3D parameters with body weight and leg circumference was assessed during a clinical study at the Medical University of Graz. Strong correlation was found in between both reference values and instep height, while correlation in between curvature of the lower leg and references was very low. We conclude that 3D imaging might be a useful and cost-effective extension of home monitoring for heart failure patients, though further (prospective) studies are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s130810584

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Newer optical scanners utilize non-contact depth sensing methods to create advanced 3D images for determining changes in leg shape, size, and consistency.

    “Newer optical scanners utilize non‐contact depth sensing methods to create advanced 3D images for determining changes in leg shape, size, and consistency. 81”

    From Prioritizing symptom management in the treatment of chronic heart failure (2020) · cites this paper as [81]

    The State-of-the-Art section says optical 3D scanners use non-contact depth sensing, and the Measurement Setup describes extracting leg geometry from 3D images. The paper supports assessing changes in leg shape and size, but our copy does not describe using these images to determine leg consistency. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]Elbischger P. Jerolitsch-Binder J. Prasser M. Menard C. Ein neuartiges Messsystem zur Exakten und effizienten Ermittlung des Extremitätenvolumnes Proceedings of the eHealth 2011 Vienna, Austria 26–27 May 2011 Schreier G. Hayn D. Ammenwerth E. OCG Vienna, Austria 2011 129 134 Available online: http://www.ehealth20xx.at/eHealth2011/papers/antonitsch.pdf (accessed on 12 June 2013)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayn, D., Fruhwald, F., Riedel, A., Falgenhauer, M., & Schreier, G.
Affiliations
  • AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
Corresponding author
Hayn, Dieter
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2013-08-14
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
10584-10598
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046547922
Cited by
10
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Keywords
heart failure, lower limb edema, edema quantification, 3D imaging, home monitoring, remote patient monitoring, 3D camera, geometric parameters, leg circumference, body weight, false positive alerts, hospital readmission, low-cost sensors
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Edema, Heart Failure, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Leg, Male, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review