Cited by 133Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementTelemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationMobile Health and mHealth Applications

A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure

Open access
Martínez, Andrés, Everss, Estrella, Rojo-Álvarez, José Luis, Figal, Domingo Pascual, García-Alberola, Arcadio·2006·Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the literature for assessing the value of home monitoring for heart failure (HF) patients. The abstracts of 383 articles were read. We excluded those in which either no home monitoring was done or only the technical aspects of the telemedicine application were described. Forty-two studies met the selection criteria. We classified the results into feasibility (technical and institutional) and impact (on the clinical process, on patient health, on accessibility and acceptability of the health system, and on the economy). Evaluating the articles showed that home monitoring in HF patients is viable, given that: (1) it appears to be technically effective for following the patient remotely; (2) it appears to be easy to use, and it is widely accepted by patients and health professionals; and (3) it appears to be economically viable. Furthermore, home monitoring of HF patients has been shown to have a positive impact on: (1) the clinical process, supported by a significant improvement of patient follow-up by adjustment of treatment, diet or behaviour, as well as hospital readmissions and emergency visits reduction; (2) the patient's health, supported by a relevant improvement in quality of life, a reduction of days in hospital, and a decrease in mortality; and (3) costs resulting from the use of health resources.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1258/135763306777889109

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martínez, A., Everss, E., Rojo-Álvarez, J. L., Figal, D. P., & García-Alberola, A.
Affiliations
  • Departamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain
  • Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (ES)
  • Departamento de Teoría de la Señal y Comunicaciones, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Arrixaca de Murcia, Spain
Venue
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
234-241
ISSN
  • 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1109
OpenAlex
W2119307792
Cited by
133
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BURJC Digital (King Juan Carlos University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
heart failure, home monitoring, telemedicine, remote patient monitoring, hospital readmission, quality of life, mortality, health care costs, patient acceptability, feasibility
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Feasibility Studies, Heart Failure, Home Care Services, Humans, Middle Aged, Patient Readmission, Quality of Life

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review