Cited by 159Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsPhysical Activity and HealthAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Dealing with the Effects of Sensor Displacement in Wearable Activity Recognition

Open access
Banos, Oresti, Toth, Mate, Damas, Miguel, Pomares, Hector, Rojas, Ignacio·2014·Sensors

Abstract

Most wearable activity recognition systems assume a predefined sensor deployment that remains unchanged during runtime. However, this assumption does not reflect real-life conditions. During the normal use of such systems, users may place the sensors in a position different from the predefined sensor placement. Also, sensors may move from their original location to a different one, due to a loose attachment. Activity recognition systems trained on activity patterns characteristic of a given sensor deployment may likely fail due to sensor displacements. In this work, we innovatively explore the effects of sensor displacement induced by both the intentional misplacement of sensors and self-placement by the user. The effects of sensor displacement are analyzed for standard activity recognition techniques, as well as for an alternate robust sensor fusion method proposed in a previous work. While classical recognition models show little tolerance to sensor displacement, the proposed method is proven to have notable capabilities to assimilate the changes introduced in the sensor position due to self-placement and provides considerable improvements for large misplacements.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s140609995

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The REALDISP dataset includes recordings from 17 subjects performing 33 different activities in three placement scenarios.

    “This dataset includes recordings from 17 subjects performing 33 different activities in three different scenarios.”

    From Feature extraction for robust physical activity recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The REALDISP dataset includes recordings from 17 subjects, seven females and ten males, ages 22 to 37.

    “This dataset includes recordings from 17 subjects, seven females and ten males, with ages ranging from 22 to 37 years old.”

    From Feature extraction for robust physical activity recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The REALDISP dataset includes three placement scenarios: Ideal-placement, Self-placement, and Mutual-placement.

    “The dataset includes recordings in three placement scenarios:”

    From Feature extraction for robust physical activity recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The REALDISP dataset includes sensor displacement such as rotation and mis-positioning from the corresponding body part.

    “The most significant characteristic of this dataset is the introduction of sensor displacement, such as rotation and mis-positioning from the corresponding body part.”

    From Feature extraction for robust physical activity recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

  • The REALDISP dataset includes 33 physical activities including warm up, fitness and cool down activities.

    “The experiment consisted in performing a complete set of exercises: 33 physical activities, including warm up, fitness and cool down activities (walking, jogging, cycling, jumping, etc.).”

    From Feature extraction for robust physical activity recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [24]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [55]Duda R.O. Hart P.E. Stork D.G. Pattern Classification 2nd ed Wiley-Interscience Hoboken, NJ, USA 2000
  2. [57]Theodoridis S. Koutroumbas K. Pattern Recognition 4th ed Academic Press Waltham, MA, USA 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Banos, O., Toth, M., Damas, M., Pomares, H., & Rojas, I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Architecture and Computer Technology, Research Center for Information and Communications Technologies-University of Granada (CITIC-UGR), C/Calle Periodista RafaelGomez Montero 2, Granada E18071, Spain
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2014-06-06
Volume
14
Issue
6
Pages
9995-10023
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2157091296
Cited by
159
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 3
FWCI
14.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Communities in ADDI (Universidad del Pais Vasco) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Institutional Repository of the University of Granada (University of Granada) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (264738, 228398)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Keywords
wearable activity recognition, sensor displacement, self-placement, sensor placement, wearable sensors
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Clothing, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Exercise, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review