Cited by 41Microwave and Dielectric Measurement TechniquesSensor Technology and Measurement SystemsFluid Dynamics and Mixing

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Universal Capacitance Model for Real-Time Biomass in Cell Culture

Open access

Abstract

: Capacitance probes have the potential to revolutionize bioprocess control due to their safe and robust use and ability to detect even the smallest capacitors in the form of biological cells. Several techniques have evolved to model biomass statistically, however, there are problems with model transfer between cell lines and process conditions. Errors of transferred models in the declining phase of the culture range for linear models around +100% or worse, causing unnecessary delays with test runs during bioprocess development. The goal of this work was to develop one single universal model which can be adapted by considering a potentially mechanistic factor to estimate biomass in yet untested clones and scales. The novelty of this work is a methodology to select sensitive frequencies to build a statistical model which can be shared among fermentations with an error between 9% and 38% (mean error around 20%) for the whole process, including the declining phase. A simple linear factor was found to be responsible for the transferability of biomass models between cell lines, indicating a link to their phenotype or physiology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s150922128

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In situ capacitance sensors only measure viable cell density and cannot measure total cell concentration or viability.

    “However, these sensors only measure the viable cell density and cannot measure the total cell concentration or the viability.”

    From Non-invasive real-time monitoring of cell concentration and viability using Doppler ultrasound. (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results and Discussion (§3.1; page unavailable) say capacitance tracks viable cell count better than total cell count after cells begin dying, and that the probe is suited to detect viable cells selectively. The Experimental Section (§2.1.4; page unavailable) says total cell concentration and viability were measured with a separate cell counter. These passages support the distinction, but not the categorical claim that capacitance sensors cannot measure total cell concentration or viability. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Rathore, A.S., and Mhatre, R. (2011). Quality by Design for Biopharmaceuticals: Principles and Case Studies, Wiley-Interscience.
  2. Tobias, R.D. (1995, January 2–5). An introduction to partial least squares regression. Proceedings of the 20th Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Orlando, FL, USA.
  3. Lohninger, H. (1999). Teach/Me—Data Analysis, Springer. [1st ed.].
  4. Beebe, K.R., Pell, R.J., and Seasholtz, M.B. (1998). Chemometrics: A Practical Guide, Wiley.
  5. Motulsky, H. (2013). Intuitive Biostatistics: A Nonmathematical Guide to Statistical Thinking, Oxford University Press. [3rd ed.].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Konakovsky, V., Yagtu, A., Clemens, C., Müller, M., Berger, M., Schlatter, S., & Herwig, C.
Affiliations
  • TU Wien (AT)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
Corresponding author
Herwig, Christoph
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2015-09-02
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
22128-22150
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1759751780
Cited by
41
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Microwave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Sensor Technology and Measurement Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
Keywords
capacitance probe, biomass estimation, cell culture, bioprocess control, model transferability, frequency selection, linear models, mechanistic model, cell lines, real-time monitoring
MeSH terms
Animals, Cricetulus, Cricetinae, Models, Biological, Models, Statistical, CHO Cells, Biomass, Cell Culture Techniques, Electric Capacitance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review