Cited by 153Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingWireless Body Area Networks

Collection and Processing of Data from Wrist Wearable Devices in Heterogeneous and Multiple-User Scenarios

Open access
De Arriba-Pérez, Francisco, Caeiro-Rodríguez, Manuel, Santos-Gago, Juan·2016·Sensors

Abstract

Over recent years, we have witnessed the development of mobile and wearable technologies to collect data from human vital signs and activities. Nowadays, wrist wearables including sensors (e.g., heart rate, accelerometer, pedometer) that provide valuable data are common in market. We are working on the analytic exploitation of this kind of data towards the support of learners and teachers in educational contexts. More precisely, sleep and stress indicators are defined to assist teachers and learners on the regulation of their activities. During this development, we have identified interoperability challenges related to the collection and processing of data from wearable devices. Different vendors adopt specific approaches about the way data can be collected from wearables into third-party systems. This hinders such developments as the one that we are carrying out. This paper contributes to identifying key interoperability issues in this kind of scenario and proposes guidelines to solve them. Taking into account these topics, this work is situated in the context of the standardization activities being carried out in the Internet of Things and Machine to Machine domains.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s16091538

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous research has highlighted risks stemming from inadequate data protection, opaque third-party sharing practices, and regulatory gaps that leave users vulnerable to breaches.

    “Previous research has highlighted risks stemming from inadequate data protection, opaque third-party sharing practices, and regulatory gaps that leave users vulnerable to breaches 33,42,54 .”

    From Privacy in consumer wearable technologies: a living systematic analysis of data policies across leading manufacturers (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    Section 5.2 describes user permission for third-party access to private wearable data and says access tokens have limited lifetimes because of security concerns. The Conclusions frame the paper’s findings as interoperability and standardization issues. Our copy does not address inadequate data protection, opaque sharing practices, regulatory gaps, or breaches; those risks cannot be verified from this source. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The patient ambulatory movement dataset contains data corresponding to all patient movements whilst wearing each IMU sensor, including rest, casual walking, strenuous exercise and sleeping.

    “Therefore, rather than comprising only standardised functional test data, as would be the case in a clinical setting, the patient ambulatory movement dataset contains data corresponding to all patient movements whilst wearing each IMU sensor, including rest, casual walking, strenuous exercise and sleeping [36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [24]IEEE-SA P2413. Standard for an Architectural Framework for the Internet of Things (IoT) Available online: https://standards.ieee.org/develop/project/2413.html (accessed on 24 May 2016)
  2. [54]Mark H. Ian W. Eibe F. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Burlington, MA, USA 2011
  3. [67]Holler J. Tsiatsis V. Mulligan C. From Machine-to-Machine to the Internet of Things: Introduction to a New Age of Intelligence Academic Press Cambridge, MA, USA 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Arriba-Pérez, F., Caeiro-Rodríguez, M., & Santos-Gago, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Telematics Engineering, University of Vigo, Campus Lagoas-Marcosende, Vigo 36310, Spain
  • Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2016-09-21
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1538
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2523343665
Cited by
153
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 4
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Investigo Institutional repository of UVigo (Universidade de Vigo) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Xunta de Galicia (GRC2013-006)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
Keywords
wearable sensor data, interoperability, heterogeneous devices, sleep monitoring, stress symptoms, heart rate, accelerometer, pedometers, machine-to-machine communication, data collection and processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review