Cited by 43Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and SensorsAdvanced Fiber Optic SensorsHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications

Fast Optical Humidity Sensor Based on Hydrogel Thin Film Expansion for Harsh Environment

Open access
Buchberger, Anton, Peterka, Sebastian, Coclite, Anna Maria, Bergmann, Alexander·2019·Sensors

Abstract

With the application of a recently developed deposition method called initiated chemical vapor deposition (iCVD), responsive hydrogel thin films in the order of a few hundred nanometers were created. When in contact with humid air, the hydrogel layer increases its thickness considerably. The measurement of the thickness change was realized interferometrically with a laser and a broadband light source in two different implementations. The relative change in thickness with respect to humidity can be described with the Flory–Huggins theory. The required Flory–Huggins interaction parameter was determined for the actual hydrogel composition. The setup was designed without electric components in the vicinity of the active sensor layer and is therefore applicable in harsh environments such as explosive or corrosive ones. The implemented sensor prototype delivered reproducible relative humidity ( R H ) values and the achieved response time for an abrupt change of the humidity τ 63 ≤ 2.5 s was about three times faster compared to one of the fastest commercially available sensors on the market.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s19050999

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Buchberger et al. prepared PHEMA hydrogel films on the order of several hundred nanometers using chemical vapor deposition.

    “In addition, hydrogel films of PHEMA on the order of several hundred nanometers were prepared by Buchberger et al. [272] using chemical vapor deposition.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Buchberger et al. [272]

  • They used Flory-Huggins theory to describe the variation of the relative thickness of the hydrogels in relation to RH; the thickness of the hydrogels increased significantly when they were in contact with humid air.

    “They used Flory–Huggins theory to describe the variation of the relative thickness of the hydrogels in relation to the RH in the environment. The thickness of the hydrogels increased significantly when they were in contact with humid air.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Buchberger et al. [272]

  • They determined the relevant interference constant x for PHEMA in combination with water over a wide range of humidity, enabling the application of this hydrogel sensor for humidity sensing in the range of 3 to 97% RH.

    “They determined the relevant interference constant x for PHEMA in combination with water over a wide range of humidity, thus enabling the application of this hydrogel sensor for humidity sensing in the range of 3 to 97% RH.”

    From Functionalized Hydrogel-Based Wearable Gas and Humidity Sensors. (2023) · cites this paper as Buchberger et al. [272]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [2]Kolpakov S.A. Gordon N.T. Mou C. Zhou K. Toward a new generation of photonic humidity sensors Sensors 2014 14 3986 4013 10.3390/s140303986 24577524 PMC4003927 · DOI
  2. [3]Wernecke R. Wernecke J. Industrial Moisture and Humidity Measurement Wiley-VCH Weinheim, Germany 2014
  3. [4]Laville C. Pellet C. N’Kaoua G. Interdigitated humidity sensors for a portable clinical microsystem IEEE-EMBS Lyon Proc. 2000 49 572 577 10.1109/MMB.2000.893849 12374340 · DOI
  4. [6]Narayanaswamy R. Wofbeis O.S. Optical Sensors—Industrial Environmental and Diagnostic Applications Springer Berlin, Germany 2004 253
  5. [8]Sakai Y. Sadaoka Y. Matsuguchi M. Humidity sensors based on polymer thin films Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1996 35 85 90 10.1016/S0925-4005(96)02019-9 · DOI
  6. [9]Farahani H. Wagiran R. Hamidon M.N. Humidity sensors principle, mechanism, and fabrication technologies: A comprehensive review Sensors 2014 14 7881 7939 10.3390/s140507881 24784036 PMC4063076 · DOI
  7. [10]Løkken T.V. Comparison of hygrometers for monitoring of water vapour in natural gas J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2012 6 24 36 10.1016/j.jngse.2012.02.001 · DOI
  8. [11]Perry R.H. Green D.W. Maloney J.O. Chemical Engineers’ Handbook 7th ed. McGraw-Hill New York, NY, USA 1997
  9. [12]Unger K. Resel R. Coclite A.M. Dynamic studies on the response to humidity of poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate) hydrogels produced by initiated chemical vapor deposition Macromol. Chem. Phys. 2016 217 2372 2379 10.1002/macp.201600271 · DOI
  10. [13]Stuart M.A.C. Huck W.T.S. Genzer J. Müller M. Ober C. Stamm M. Sukhorukov G.B. Szleifer I. Tsukruk V.V. Urban M. Emerging applications of stimuli-responsive polymer materials Nat. Mater. 2010 9 101 113 10.1038/nmat2614 20094081 · DOI
  11. [14]Rubinstein M. Colby R.H. Polymer Physics Oxford University Press Oxford, UK 2003
  12. [15]Teraoka I. Polymer Solutions John Wiley & Sons New York, NY, USA 2002 10.1002/0471224510 · DOI
  13. [16]Reeja-Jayan B. Kovacik P. Yang R. Sojoudi H. Ugur A. Kim D.H. Petruczok C.D. Wang X. Liu A. Gleason K.K. A route towards sustainability through engineered polymeric interfaces Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2014 1 1 30 10.1002/admi.201400117 · DOI
  14. [17]Petruczok C.D. Armagan E. Ince G.O. Gleason K.K. Initiated chemical vapor deposition and light-responsive cross-linking of poly(vinyl cinnamate) thin films Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2014 35 1345 1350 10.1002/marc.201400130 24817405 · DOI
  15. [18]Coclite A.M. Howden R.M. Borrelli D.C. Petruczok C.D. Yang R. Yagüe J.L. Ugur A. Chen N. Lee S. Jo W.J. 25th anniversary article: CVD polymers: A new paradigm for surface modification and device fabrication Adv. Mater. 2013 25 5392 5423 10.1002/adma.201301878 24115244 · DOI
  16. [19]Christian P. Ehmann H.M. Werzer O. Coclite A.M. Wrinkle formation in a polymeric drug coating deposited via initiated chemical vapor deposition Soft Matter 2016 12 9501 9508 10.1039/C6SM01919F 27841419 PMC5315011 · DOI
  17. [20]Ranacher C. Resel R. Moni P. Cermenek B. Hacker V. Coclite A.M. Layered nanostructures in proton conductive polymers obtained by initiated chemical vapor deposition Macromolecules 2015 48 6177 6185 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01145 · DOI
  18. [21]Reinhardt H.M. Recktenwald D. Kim H.C. Hampp N.A. High refractive index TiO2-PHEMA hydrogel for ophthalmological applications J. Mater. Sci. 2016 51 9971 9978 10.1007/s10853-016-0224-x · DOI
  19. [22]Sperling L.H. Introduction to Physical Polymer Science 4th ed. John Wiley & Sons Hoboken, NJ, USA 2006 84
  20. [23]Mark J. Physical Properties of Polymers Handbook 2nd ed. Springer New York, NY, USA 2007
  21. [24]Rodríguez O. Fomasiero F. Arcea A. Radkea C.J. Prausnitz J.M. Solubilities and diffusivities of water vapor in poly(methylmethacrylate), poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate), poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) and poly(acrylonitrile) Polymer 2003 44 6323 6333 10.1016/S0032-3861(03)00654-2 · DOI
  22. [25]Salzmann P. Perrotta A. Coclite A.M. Different response kinetics to temperature and water vapor of acrylamide polymers obtained by initiated chemical vapor deposition ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018 10 6636 6645 10.1021/acsami.7b18878 29376640 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Buchberger, A., Peterka, S., Coclite, A. M., & Bergmann, A.
Affiliations
Graz University of Technology (AT)
Corresponding author
Buchberger, Anton
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-02-26
Volume
19
Issue
5
Pages
999
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2917803668
Cited by
43
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Österreichische Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft (861163)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Fiber Optic Sensors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
Keywords
optical humidity sensor, hydrogel thin films, initiated chemical vapor deposition, Flory-Huggins interaction parameter, relative humidity, harsh environment sensing, fast response time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review