Cited by 24Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsInnovative Human-Technology Interaction

WaistonBelt X: A Belt-Type Wearable Device with Sensing and Intervention Toward Health Behavior Change

Open access
Nakamura, Yugo, Matsuda, Yuki, Arakawa, Yutaka, Yasumoto, Keiichi·2019·Sensors

Abstract

Changing behavior related to improper lifestyle habits has attracted attention as a solution to prevent lifestyle diseases, such as diabetes, heart disease, arteriosclerosis, and stroke. To drive health behavior changes, wearable devices are needed, and they must not only provide accurate sensing and visualization functions but also effective intervention functions. In this paper, we propose a health support system, WaistonBelt X, that consists of a belt-type wearable device with sensing and intervention functions and a smartphone application. WaistonBelt X can automatically measure a waistline with a magnetometer that detects the movements of a blade installed in the buckle, and monitor the basic activities of daily living with inertial sensors. Furthermore, WaistonBelt X intervenes with the user to correct lifestyle habits by using a built-in vibrator. Through evaluation experiments, we confirmed that our proposed device achieves measurement of the circumference on the belt position (mean absolute error of 0.93 cm) and basic activity recognition (F1 score of 0.95) with high accuracy. In addition, we confirmed that the intervention via belt vibration effectively improves the sitting posture of the user.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s19204600

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WaistonBelt X received an F1 score of 0.82 for seven activities trailed with 17 participants, with some misclassifications occurring between sitting and standing, walking and walking up and down stairs.

    “WaistonBelt X received an F1 score of 0.82, with some misclassifications occurring between sitting and standing, walking and walking up and down stairs [162].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakamura, Y., Matsuda, Y., Arakawa, Y., & Yasumoto, K.
Affiliations
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
  • Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
Corresponding author
  • Nakamura, Yugo
  • Matsuda, Yuki
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-10-22
Volume
19
Issue
20
Pages
4600
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2981600727
Cited by
24
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Japan Science and Technology Agency (JPMJPR18UK, JPMJPR1868)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Keywords
waist measurement, magnetometer, inertial sensors, activity recognition, health behavior change, sitting posture, mobile application, health support system
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Wearable Electronic Devices, Adult, Algorithms, Female, Humans, Male, Posture, Surveys and Questionnaires, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Health Behavior, Young Adult, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review