Cited by 59Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionMachine Learning and AlgorithmsAdvanced Neural Network Applications

Deep Active Learning for Surface Defect Detection

Open access
Lv, Xiaoming, Duan, Fajie, Jiang, Jia-Jia, Fu, Xiao, Gan, Lin·2020·Sensors

Abstract

Most of the current object detection approaches deliver competitive results with an assumption that a large number of labeled data are generally available and can be fed into a deep network at once. However, due to expensive labeling efforts, it is difficult to deploy the object detection systems into more complex and challenging real-world environments, especially for defect detection in real industries. In order to reduce the labeling efforts, this study proposes an active learning framework for defect detection. First, an Uncertainty Sampling is proposed to produce the candidate list for annotation. Uncertain images can provide more informative knowledge for the learning process. Then, an Average Margin method is designed to set the sampling scale for each defect category. In addition, an iterative pattern of training and selection is adopted to train an effective detection model. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method can render the required performance with fewer labeled data.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s20061650

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asia (China), North America (United States of America), and Europe (Germany) are producing the main advances in active learning for object detection research.

    “An analysis of the research groups or technological companies working in AL for OD showed that Asia (China), North America (United States of America), and Europe (Germany) are producing the main advances in this research field (e.g., [5,36,55]), as can be seen in Figure 5.”

    From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [55]

    The Abstract and §3.1 describe this paper’s active-learning method for surface defect detection, so it is a relevant example of an advance in the field. Our copy does not establish the authors’ country or compare advances by region. The statement about which regions produce the main advances is the citing authors’ analysis, not a finding reported by this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Other applications such as document layout detection, pose estimation, and surface defect detection remain under-explored.

    “Other applications such as document layout detection [14,17], pose estimation [7], and surface defect detection [55] remain under-explored, as well.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 26 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [3]Liu R.-X. Yao M.-H. Wang X.-B. Defects Detection Based on Deep Learning and Transfer Learning Metal. Min. Ind. 2015 Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285367015_Defects_detection_based_on_deep_learning_and_transfer_learning (accessed on 12 March 2020)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lv, X., Duan, F., Jiang, J.-J., Fu, X., & Gan, L.
Affiliations
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • The State Key Lab of Precision Measuring Technology and Instruments, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Corresponding author
Duan, Fajie
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-03-16
Volume
20
Issue
6
Pages
1650
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012089510
Cited by
58
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
4.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundations of China (No.61905175, 51775377, 61971307)
  • National key research and development plan (2017YFF0204800)
  • the Tianjin Natural Science Foundations of China (No.17JCQNJC01100)
  • Equipment pre-research field fund (61405180505, 61400040303)
  • Science and Technology on Underwater Information and Control Laboratory (6142218081811)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
active learning (machine learning), surface defect detection, uncertainty sampling, annotation cost reduction, industrial inspection, object detection, semi-supervised learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review