Cited by 21Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionInfant Health and Development

Unsupervised End-to-End Deep Model for Newborn and Infant Activity Recognition

Open access
Jun, Kyungkoo, Choi, Soonpil·2020·Sensors

Abstract

Human activity recognition (HAR) works have mostly focused on the activities of adults. However, HAR is typically beneficial to the safety and wellness of newborn or infants because they have difficulties in verbal communication. The activities of infants are different from those of adults in terms of its types and intensity. Hence, it is necessary to study the behavior of infants separately. We study newborn and infant activity recognition by analyzing accelerometer data from the sensors attached to body. We aim to classify four types of activities: sleeping, moving in agony, moving in normal condition, and movement by external force. For this work, we collected 11 h videos and corresponding sensor data from 10 infant subjects. For recognition, we propose an end-to-end deep model using autoencoder and k-means clustering, which is trained in an unsupervised way. From a set of performance tests, our model can achieve 0.96 in balanced accuracy and F-1 score of 0.95.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/s20226467

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Using a three-layer autoencoder combined with k-means clustering, Jun and Choi achieve 96% weighted accuracy in an unsupervised way for classifying newborn and infant activities.

    “Using the data from an accelerometer attached to the body and a three-layer autoencoder combined with k-means clustering, they achieve 96% weighted accuracy in an unsupervised way.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jun, K., & Choi, S.
Affiliations
  • Incheon National University (KR)
  • ChoisTechnology, Incheon 21984, Korea
Corresponding author
Jun, Kyungkoo
Venue
Sensors
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-11-12
Volume
20
Issue
22
Pages
6467
ISSN
1424-8220 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3099729056
Cited by
21
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sensors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Incheon National University (2016-2031)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Infant Health and Development
Keywords
wearable accelerometers, unsupervised learning, autoencoder, K-means clustering, infant safety
MeSH terms
Adult, Computer Simulation, Humans, Human Activities, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Movement, Cluster Analysis, Recognition, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review