Correction: Arosio, L. Generative AI as a Teaching Tool for Social Research Methodology: Addressing Challenges in Higher Education. Societies 2025, 15, 157
Open accessAbstract
The author utilized an AI tool as part of the content generation process itself (e [...]
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study applies an authorship and allowable-use policy where Midjourney supports early ideation but final submissions must demonstrate student-directed refinement and include structured process documentation.
“To prevent assessment ambiguity, the study applies an authorship and allowable-use policy in which Midjourney may support early ideation and exploratory variants, while final submissions must demonstrate studentdirected refinement and include structured process documentation that links prompts, selections, and revisions to design rationales (Arosio 2025).”
From A Study on the Role of Midjourney, A Generative Artificial Intelligence Tool, in Enhancing Student Creativity in Illustration Design Classes (2026) · cites this paper as Arosio 2025
Cites
Arosio, L. (2025) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc15060157 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
He, S. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70305
- Authors
- Arosio, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Arosio, Laura
- ORCID
- Arosio, Laura
- Venue
- Societies
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-09-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 255
- ISSN
- 2075-4698 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4414261708
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Societies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology in Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Research and Methods
- Keywords
- generative AI, social science methodology, teaching aids, higher education, AI-generated content
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
