Cited by 79Critical Race Theory in EducationEducation Discipline and InequalityRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

‘If your hair is relaxed, white people are relaxed. If your hair is nappy, they’re not happy’: black hair as a site of ‘post-racial’ social control in English schools

Open access
Joseph-Salisbury, Remi, Connelly, Laura·2018·Social Sciences

Abstract

A growing body of literature examines how social control is embedded within, and enacted through, key social institutions generally, and how it impacts disproportionately upon racially minoritised people specifically. Despite this, little attention has been given to the minutiae of these forms of social control. Centring Black hair as a site of social control, and using a contemporary case study to illustrate, this article argues that it is through such forms of routine discipline that conditions of white supremacy are maintained and perpetuated. Whilst our entry into a ‘post-racial’ epoch means school policies are generally thought of as race-neutral or ‘colorblind’, we draw attention to how they (re)produce and normalise surface-level manifestations of anti-Blackness. Situating Black hair as a form of ‘racial symbolism’ and showing Black hairstyles to be significant to Black youth, we show that the governance of hair is not neutral but instead, acts as a form of social control that valorises whiteness and pathologises Blackness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/socsci7110219

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Black hair practices need to be contextualised within a racialised social structure that privileges White appearance ideals and stigmatises physical features associated with Black people, such as skin colour and hair.

    “This is consistent with work by Joseph-Salisbury and Connelly (2018), who argue that Black hair practices need to be contextualised within a racialised social structure that privileges White appearance ideals and stigmatises physical features associated with Black people, such as skin colour and hair.”

    From Skin shade and relationships: how colourism pits Black and mixed Black-White women against each other (2024) · cites this paper as Joseph-Salisbury and Connelly, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joseph-Salisbury, R., & Connelly, L.
Affiliations
  • Sociology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
  • University of Salford (GB)
Corresponding author
Connelly, Laura
Venue
Social Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-11-01
Volume
7
Issue
11
Pages
219
ISSN
2076-0760 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2898754046
Cited by
79
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
24.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Salford Institutional Repository (University of Salford) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/R009341/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
black hair, social control, post-racialism, anti-Blackness, whiteness, racial symbolism, school policy, English schools, white supremacy, color vision deficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review