Cited by 28Sports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and PerformanceSports Science and Education

What Is Performance? A Scoping Review of Performance Outcomes as Study Endpoints in Athletics

Open access
Raysmith, Benjamin P., Jacobsson, Jenny, Drew, Michael K., Timpka, Toomas·2019·Sports

Abstract

Purpose: This review set out to summarise, define, and provide future direction towards the use of performance outcome measures as endpoints in research performed at international benchmark events in athletics. Methods: Scoping review methodology was applied through a search of the PubMed and Sports Discus databases and a systematic article selection procedure. Articles that met the inclusion criteria underwent triage for further quantitative and qualitative analysis. A concept chart was generated to describe the methods by which performance had been measured and introduce descriptive labels for theoretical and practical application. Results: None of 2972 articles primarily identified from the database search met the triage standards for quantitative data extraction. Eleven articles were included in a qualitative analysis. The analysis identified the common methods by which performance has been measured, reported and analysed. The resulting concept chart collates labels from the qualitative analysis (categories, themes, and constructs) with sports practice labels (performance metrics, framework, and analysis). Conclusions: The state of knowledge concerning methods to employ performance metrics as endpoints in studies performed at major competitions in athletics has been summarised. Constructing a methodology that combines the performance metric variables (continuous and ordinal) that are currently utilised as endpoints remains a challenge.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/sports7030066

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Evaluation of coaching performance can fluctuate between intrapersonal and interpersonal viewpoints, as well as continuous and ordinal metrics.

    “The evaluation of performance for example, can fluctuate between intrapersonal and interpersonal viewpoints, as well as continuous (e.g. times and distance) and ordinal (e.g. ranking or league position) metrics [40].”

    From The Mental Health of Elite-Level Coaches: A Systematic Scoping Review (2024) · cites this paper as [40]

    The Discussion (§4.1) describes evaluating athletics results within intra-personal or inter-personal frames, and the Discussion opening identifies continuous and ordinal performance metrics. These passages concern athlete performance, not coaching performance, so they support the verbatim citing sentence’s general description but not the claim’s extension to coaching. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 36 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [29]Spiriev B. Spiriev A. IAAF Scoring Tables of Athletics, Revised Edition International Association of Athletics Federations Monaco, France 1998
  2. [30]Spiriev B. Spiriev A. IAAF Scoring Tables of Athletics, Revised Edition International Association of Athletics Federations Monaco, France 2008

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Raysmith, B. P., Jacobsson, J., Drew, M. K., & Timpka, T.
Affiliations
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • University of Canberra (AU)
Corresponding author
Raysmith, Benjamin P.
Venue
Sports
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-03-16
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
66
ISSN
2075-4663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2921534444
Cited by
28
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3
FWCI
0.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sports (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DiVA (Linkoping University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Sports Science and Education
Keywords
performance outcomes, study endpoints, track and field, performance indicators, performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review