Variability of Competitive Performance of Elite Athletes: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background Estimates of the variability that athletes show from competition to competition provide information about the relative contributions of environmental and other factors affecting competitive performance. Smallest and other important thresholds for assessing changes in performance in competitions and field or laboratory tests can also be derived from estimates of variability. Objectives To systematically review estimates of within-athlete variability of competitive performance in various sports. Methods We searched SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar for studies providing estimates of within-athlete variability between competitions. Estimates are reported here as coefficients of variation (CV) only for the best athletes. Some studies also combined within-athlete variability with between-athlete differences into a measure of predictability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient, reported here for the full field of competition. Results Skeleton and 1,000-m speed-skating times have the lowest within-athlete variability (CV of 0.15% and 0.4%, respectively), apparently because of the effect of the initial phase of the race on race dynamics. Times in sprint and endurance sports also have relatively low variability (0.6-1.4%), reflecting the predominant contribution of mean power output to performance. The power-velocity relationship tends to make CV for time smaller in sports performed against water or wind resistance, but this effect is offset by variability in the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Malcata and Hopkins (2014) found intraclass correlation coefficients for athletes' performance within a season and across a year ranging dramatically across domains (e.g., cross-country skiing 0.93/0.9; triathlon 0.36/0.15; canoe slalom 0.31/0.27).
“Malcata and Hopkins (2014) reviewed research in sports and found intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for athletes’ performance within a season and across a year ranging dramatically across domains. For example, cross-country skiing had an ICC for within-season practice of 0.93 and across a year of 0.9, whereas triathlon had ICCs of 0.36 and 0.15, respectively, and canoe slalom had ICCs of 0”
From Deliberate Practice and Proposed Limits on the Effects of Practice on the Acquisition of Expert Performance: Why the Original Definition Matters and Recommendations for Future Research (2019) · cites this paper as Malcata and Hopkins (2014)
Cites
Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science
HOPKINS, W. G., MARSHALL, S. W., BATTERHAM, A. M., & HANIN, J. (2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31818cb278 · Cited by 9,128 · see citing works
Self-citationMeasures of Reliability in Sports Medicine and Science
Hopkins, W. G. (2000) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/00007256-200030010-00001 · Cited by 4,635 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ericsson, K. A., & Harwell, K. W. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02396 · Cited by 370 · see citing works
Ketone bodies and exercise performance: The next magic bullet or merely hype?
Pinckaers, P. J. M., Churchward-Venne, T. A., Bailey, D., & van Loon, L. J. C. (2017) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-016-0577-y · Cited by 113 · see citing works
O’Malley, T., Myette-Cote, E., Durrer, C., & Little, J. P. (2017) · Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism · doi:10.1139/apnm-2016-0641 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Metabolic Responses and Pacing Strategies during Successive Sprint Skiing Time Trials
ANDERSSON, E., HOLMBERG, H.-C., ØRTENBLAD, N., & BJÖRKLUND, G. (2016) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0000000000001037 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
What Is Performance? A Scoping Review of Performance Outcomes as Study Endpoints in Athletics
Raysmith, B. P., Jacobsson, J., Drew, M. K., & Timpka, T. (2019) · Sports · doi:10.3390/sports7030066 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- Malcata, R. M., & Hopkins, W. G.
- Affiliations
- Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
- Corresponding author
- Malcata, Rita M.
- ORCID
- Hopkins, Will G.
- Venue
- Sports Medicine
- Published
- 2014-08-10
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1763-1774
- ISSN
- 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
- 1179-2035
- OpenAlex
- W2095406014
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
- Keywords
- competitive performance, elite athletes, coefficient of variation, predictability, intraclass correlation coefficient, minimal detectable change, power-velocity relationship, power-duration relationship, subjective scoring, field events, weightlifting, skeleton, speed skating, cross-country skiing, performance improvement
- MeSH terms
- Competitive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Sports, Reproducibility of Results, Athletic Performance, Athletes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review