Cited by 145Sports Performance and TrainingSport Psychology and PerformanceSports Analytics and Performance

Variability of Competitive Performance of Elite Athletes: A Systematic Review

Malcata, Rita M., Hopkins, Will G.·2014·Sports Medicine

Abstract

Background Estimates of the variability that athletes show from competition to competition provide information about the relative contributions of environmental and other factors affecting competitive performance. Smallest and other important thresholds for assessing changes in performance in competitions and field or laboratory tests can also be derived from estimates of variability. Objectives To systematically review estimates of within-athlete variability of competitive performance in various sports. Methods We searched SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar for studies providing estimates of within-athlete variability between competitions. Estimates are reported here as coefficients of variation (CV) only for the best athletes. Some studies also combined within-athlete variability with between-athlete differences into a measure of predictability expressed as an intraclass correlation coefficient, reported here for the full field of competition. Results Skeleton and 1,000-m speed-skating times have the lowest within-athlete variability (CV of 0.15% and 0.4%, respectively), apparently because of the effect of the initial phase of the race on race dynamics. Times in sprint and endurance sports also have relatively low variability (0.6-1.4%), reflecting the predominant contribution of mean power output to performance. The power-velocity relationship tends to make CV for time smaller in sports performed against water or wind resistance, but this effect is offset by variability in the…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s40279-014-0239-x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Malcata and Hopkins (2014) found intraclass correlation coefficients for athletes' performance within a season and across a year ranging dramatically across domains (e.g., cross-country skiing 0.93/0.9; triathlon 0.36/0.15; canoe slalom 0.31/0.27).

    “Malcata and Hopkins (2014) reviewed research in sports and found intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for athletes’ performance within a season and across a year ranging dramatically across domains. For example, cross-country skiing had an ICC for within-season practice of 0.93 and across a year of 0.9, whereas triathlon had ICCs of 0.36 and 0.15, respectively, and canoe slalom had ICCs of 0”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malcata, R. M., & Hopkins, W. G.
Affiliations
Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
Corresponding author
Malcata, Rita M.
Venue
Sports Medicine
Published
2014-08-10
Volume
44
Issue
12
Pages
1763-1774
ISSN
  • 0112-1642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1179-2035
OpenAlex
W2095406014
Cited by
145
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Johns Hopkins University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Sports Analytics and Performance
Keywords
competitive performance, elite athletes, coefficient of variation, predictability, intraclass correlation coefficient, minimal detectable change, power-velocity relationship, power-duration relationship, subjective scoring, field events, weightlifting, skeleton, speed skating, cross-country skiing, performance improvement
MeSH terms
Competitive Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Sports, Reproducibility of Results, Athletic Performance, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review