Cited by 1,020Sustainability and Climate Change GovernanceClimate Change Policy and EconomicsGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research

Escaping carbon lock-in

Unruh, Gregory C.·2002·Energy Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0301-4215(01)00098-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Unruh, G. C.
Affiliations
Fundación IE (ES)
Corresponding author
Unruh, Gregory C.
Venue
Energy Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
317-325
ISSN
0301-4215 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055908663
Cited by
1,020
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 82 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 43 · 2012: 47
FWCI
5.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Energy Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
Keywords
carbon lock-in, path dependence, increasing returns to scale, climate policy, energy system transformation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review