Cited by 74Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityFinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital FinanceDigital Platforms and Economics

Sustainable Growth and Token Economy Design: The Case of Steemit

Open access
Kim, Moon Soo, Chung, Jee Yong·2018·Sustainability

Abstract

Cryptocurrency blockchain technology is attracting worldwide attention, and the number of initial coin offerings (ICOs) is increasing rapidly. This new economic trend, called cryptoeconomics, can program human behavior through incentive design. A cryptocurrency-based incentive system is not only transparent, but also allows businesses to substitute initial investment costs with cryptocurrency tokens until they are on a sustainable growth trajectory in terms of network effects. This study aims to propose a process for building a desirable model of a token economy, based on the case of Steemit—a blogging and social networking website that is creating high values due to its efficient token economy model. We suggest the following design process of a token economy model: (1) Determine token-business fit, (2) determine the chance of success, (3) determine the properties of token, (4) give tokens intrinsic value, (5) establish strategies to raise token value, (6) establish operational strategies of token economy system, (7) establish strategies for token liquidation, and (8) continue modifying the operational base. Considering cryptoeconomics is still at an early stage, it is expected that the guidelines on the token economy model suggested in this paper will lay a significant foundation for the development of cryptoeconomics research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su11010167

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The modeling of assets as tokens is a topic of ongoing research, and we lack knowledge on how AI-related assets can be modeled and represented adequately as tokens.

    “Furthermore, the modeling of assets as tokens is a topic of ongoing research (Kim and Chung 2018;Laskowski et al. 2019) and, thus far, we lack knowledge on what and how AI-related assets (e.g., training data, model data, algorithms) can be modeled and represented adequately as tokens.”

    From Trustworthy artificial intelligence (2021) · cites this paper as Kim and Chung 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Moisteiro, A.M. Financial Incentives in Crowdsourced Content Curation. Master's Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, 2018.
  2. Babbitt, D.; Dietz, J. Crypto-Economic Design: A Proposed Agent-Based Modeling Effort; Conference Talk; University of Notre Dame: Notre Dame, IN, USA, 2014.
  3. Mougayar, W. The Business Blockchain: Promise, Practice, and Application of the Next Internet Technology; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016.
  4. Anand, M. Decoding Token Economics: Insights from Our Token Engineering & Token Economy Design Workshop at Berlin Blockchain Week. Available online: https://medium.com/ostdotcom/decoding-token- economics-insights-from-our-token-engineering-token-economy-design-workshop-at-cfd1a0e39421 (accessed on 6 September 2018).
  5. Zipf, G.K. Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort; Addison-Wesley: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1949.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, M. S., & Chung, J. Y.
Affiliations
  • Department of Crypto MBA, Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies (aSSIST), Seoul 03767, Korea
  • Duksung Women's University (KR)
Corresponding author
Chung, Jee Yong
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2018-12-30
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
167
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2907379139
Cited by
74
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Duksung Women`s University (3000003055)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Digital Platforms and Economics
Keywords
token economy, cryptoeconomics, Steemit, cryptocurrency, incentive design, initial coin offerings, blockchain, network effects, sustainable growth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review