The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Consumers’ Perceived Values on Intention to Purchase Upcycled Products
Open accessAbstract
As concerns around today’s environmental problems increase, there is a growing need for consumers to accelerate their sustainable behaviors relating to product disposal such as product reuse and product life extension. The purpose of this study was to investigate consumers’ value perceptions and their intentions to purchase upcycled products. This study identified the total perceived utility of upcycled products as six values that influence different levels of product attitude, which, in turn, affect purchase intention. In addition, the study examined the moderating role of purchase experience in the relationship between perceived value and product attitude. Survey data from 413 people in the United States were used to test our hypotheses. We found that three values (i.e., green, emotional, aesthetic) had a significantly positive effect on both product attitude and purchase intention. The moderating effect of purchase experience was found only on the paths between green and functional values and product attitude. The findings offer implications for academics, practitioners, and policymakers in designing strategies that encourage people to purchase upcycled products. We conclude that organizations should design strategies that maximize the emotional and aesthetic values of upcycled products using varied and engaging content, such as storytelling, based on each product’s background.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
Possessions and the Extended Self
Belk, R. W. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209154 · Cited by 9,064
Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 · Cited by 7,806 · cited 2×
“Next, we tested for mediation effects of product attitude in the relationship between each product value and purchase intention using the bootstrap sampling method (bootstrap sample size = 5000), as recommended by MacKinnon, Lockwood, and Williams [70], to generate the asymmetric confidence intervals (CIs) for indirec…”
MethodStructural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Third Edition
Byrne, B. M. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315757421 · Cited by 4,653
Multiple Processes by which Attitudes Guide Behavior: The Mode Model as an Integrative Framework
Fazio, R. H. (1990) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60318-4 · Cited by 2,002
Attitudes and the Prediction of Behavior: A Meta-Analysis of the Empirical Literature
Kraus, S. J. (1995) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167295211007 · Cited by 1,613
Environmental segmentation alternatives: a look at green consumer behavior in the new millennium
Straughan, R. D., & Roberts, J. A. (1999) · Journal of Consumer Marketing · doi:10.1108/07363769910297506 · Cited by 1,611
Chen, Y., & Chang, C. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211216250 · Cited by 1,370
Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics
Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P. (1981) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208859 · Cited by 962
Comparing Consumers’ Recall of Prepurchase and Postpurchase Product Evaluation Experiences
Gardial, S. F., Clemons, D. S., Woodruff, R. B., Schumann, D. W., & Burns, M. J. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209369 · Cited by 392
Cited by
Factors affecting green purchase behavior: A systematic literature review
Sharma, K., Aswal, C., & Paul, J. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3237 · Cited by 325
Kim, I., Jung, H. J., & Lee, Y. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13031208 · Cited by 249
Suphasomboon, T., & Vassanadumrongdee, S. (2022) · Sustainable Production and Consumption · doi:10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.004 · Cited by 163
Caldera, S., Jayasinghe, R., Desha, C., Dawes, L., & Ferguson, S. (2022) · Journal of Sustainable Development of Energy, Water and Environment Systems · doi:10.13044/j.sdewes.d8.0367 · Cited by 44
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, S., & Lee, J.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-02-16
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1034
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2913338443
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 22.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Consumers’ Perceived Values on Intention to Purchase Upcycled Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su11041034
- The paper
- Yu, S., & Lee, J. (2019). The Effects of Consumers’ Perceived Values on Intention to Purchase Upcycled Products. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041034
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.