The DOI matches its Crossref record; 94 of the 135 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A path transition towards a bioeconomy–the crucial role of sustainability
Open accessAbstract
The bioeconomy is a worldwide used strategy to cope with ecological, social, and economic sustainability challenges. However, we analyze current bioeconomy strategies and trends to point out potential sustainability conflicts and transition challenges. Our analysis shows that the bioeconomy is not sustainable per se, as mere input substitution may entail welfare losses. Instead, it requires further debates and actions to avoid exacerbation of ecological and social strains. Sustainability has to be the key concept behind the bioeconomy and predominantly requires (1) sustainability of the resource base and (2) sustainability of processes and products, especially by (3) circular processes of material fluxes, not least to gain consumer acceptance for bio-based products. Otherwise, the bioeconomy would only entail the substitution of fossil resources for bio-based resources potentially lacking the generation of additional societal and ecological benefits and contribution to climate mitigation. As markets alone will not suffice to fulfil this path transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy, we argue that innovative governance is necessary to reduce competitive drawbacks compared to fossil resources (enabling function) and to secure ecological, social, and economic sustainability requirements (limiting function).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Similarly, the bioeconomy enables the transition from fossil-based to biomass-based industrial inputs and emphasizes the sustainable use of renewable resources for economic, environmental, and social benefits (Pfau et al., 2014; D'Amato et al., 2018; Gawel et al., 2019).”
From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Gawel et al., 2019
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Some definitions suggest that the bioeconomy is not intrinsically sustainable just because it is based on renewable resources (Pfau et al., 2014; Gawel et al., 2019).”
From Circular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective (2021) · cites this paper as Gawel et al., 2019
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A safe operating space for humanity
Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H. J., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461472a · Cited by 13,333 · cited 1×
“The global economy has to feed an increasing world population with a simultaneous rise of the living standard, but is restricted by planetary boundaries [1].”
BackgroundEconomic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention
Arrow, K. (1962) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13 · Cited by 9,693 · cited 1×
“Investors are not able to appropriate the whole benefits of investments, which leads to an underinvestment in innovation and learning from a social perspective [140].”
BackgroundCompeting Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events
Arthur, W. B. (1989) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234208 · Cited by 7,489 · cited 2×
“However, fossil resource-based technologies can benefit from past learning effects, increasing returns and network externalities; these interact with the specialised nature of investments to create a technological path dependency [141].”
BackgroundFree competition and the optimal amount of fraud
Darby, M. R., & Karni, E. (1973) · The Journal of Law and Economics · doi:10.1086/466756 · Cited by 3,947 · cited 1×
“[50,83]), the environmental benefits of bio-based products are even more critical attributes of trust in need of explanations [84,85].”
BackgroundUnruh, G. C. (2000) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/s0301-4215(00)00070-7 · Cited by 3,304 · cited 1×
“Without question, the path transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy is a complex process that has to overcome the perpetuated lock-in into fossil resource-based production and consumption structures (“carbon lock-in”, see Reference [130]).”
BackgroundA tale of two market failures: Technology and environmental policy
Jaffe, A., Newell, R., & Stavins, R. (2005) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.027 · Cited by 1,742 · cited 1×
“Moreover, investments in innovation and the deployment of innovative technologies give rise to knowledge and learning spillovers, which constitute a positive externality [138,139].”
BackgroundResolution Adopted By The General Assembly
East, E. Y. O. I. A. M. (1984) · International Legal Materials · doi:10.1163/9789004283688_019 · Cited by 1,670
A good life for all within planetary boundaries
O’Neill, D. W., Fanning, A. L., Lamb, W. F., & Steinberger, J. K. (2018) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0021-4 · Cited by 1,452 · cited 1×
“Furthermore, sufficiency policy is needed to complement the efficiency policy measures to avoid rebound effects [91,158,159].”
BackgroundReview of Hydrogels and Aerogels Containing Nanocellulose
France, K. J. D., Hoare, T. R., & Cranston, E. D. (2017) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531 · Cited by 1,371 · cited 1×
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundPromotion of the use of energy from renewable sources
Sandberg-Mørch, L. (2011) · European Energy & Climate Journal · doi:10.4337/eecj.2011.01.10 · Cited by 1,254
Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation
Fischer, C., & Newell, R. G. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2007.11.001 · Cited by 1,157 · cited 1×
“Moreover, investments in innovation and the deployment of innovative technologies give rise to knowledge and learning spillovers, which constitute a positive externality [138,139].”
BackgroundWhat Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature
Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8070691 · Cited by 909 · cited 1×
“[44] distinguish between a (i) bio-technology vision (focus on research, application and commercialisation of bio-technology), (ii) bio-resource vision (focus on processing and upgrading of biological raw materials and establishment of new value chains) and (iii) bio-ecology vision (focus on sustainability and ecologi…”
BackgroundHolladay, J. E., White, J. F., Bozell, J. J., & Johnson, D. (2007) · doi:10.2172/921839 · Cited by 905 · cited 1×
“In the future, lignin could also be employed to produce for example fine chemicals, bioplastics [106] or glues [116,117].”
BackgroundThe role of biomass and bioenergy in a future bioeconomy: policies and facts
Scarlat, N., Dallemand, J.-F., Monforti-Ferrario, F., & Nita, V. (2015) · Environmental Development · doi:10.1016/j.envdev.2015.03.006 · Cited by 895
Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development
Brandner, R., Flatscher, G., Ringhofer, A., Schickhofer, G., & Thiel, A. (2015) · European Journal of Wood and Wood Products · doi:10.1007/s00107-015-0999-5 · Cited by 781 · cited 1×
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundThe Bioeconomy in Europe: An Overview
McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5062589 · Cited by 720 · cited 1×
“Policies should create opportunities for the society to become engaged [47,68,151] as region-specific bottom-up approaches and social innovation matter in developing a sustainable bioeconomy [79,132].”
BackgroundNatural Fibre Composites and Their Applications: A Review
Peças, P., Carvalho, H., Salman, H., & Leite, M. (2018) · Journal of Composites Science · doi:10.3390/jcs2040066 · Cited by 645 · cited 1×
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundFoxon, T., Gross, R., Chase, A., Howes, J., Arnall, A., & Anderson, D. (2005) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.011 · Cited by 589
Carbon Emissions of Infrastructure Development
Müller, D. B., Liu, G., Løvik, A. N., Modaresi, R., Pauliuk, S., Steinhoff, F. S., & Brattebø, H. (2013) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es402618m · Cited by 442
Staffas, L., Gustavsson, M., & McCormick, K. (2013) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su5062751 · Cited by 410
Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research
Pfau, S., Hagens, J., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031222 · Cited by 398 · cited 2×
“Reference [21]), consumer acceptance of bio-based products struggles with several challenges (for an overview see Reference [90]), but after all, sustainability is the key for purchasing decisions in favour of the bioeconomy.”
BackgroundJUST OIL? THE DISTRIBUTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS OF OIL PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
O'Rourke, D., & Connolly, S. (2003) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.28.050302.105617 · Cited by 379 · cited 18×
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialJenkins, J. (2014) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.003 · Cited by 314 · cited 1×
“Examples are GHG emissions, land degradation through mining, air pollution or waste generation which give rise to negative externalities, which, in the absence of policy measures, are insufficiently reflected in market prices [135,136].”
BackgroundPolicy: Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy
El-Chichakli, B., von Braun, J., Lang, C., Barben, D., & Philp, J. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/535221a · Cited by 266 · cited 8×
“As the SDG’s cover nature, economy and society as the three pillars of sustainability, the question remains, how and in what way the bioeconomy can support synergies of diverse sustainability goals from different pillars and thus, help to contribute to as many SDGs as possible.”
BackgroundInfluentialBirch, K., Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2010) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su2092898 · Cited by 247 · cited 1×
“7), own translation) for the “neoliberalization of nature” [41], which secures a “regime of accumulation against major sociopolitical and ecological challenges” [42].”
BackgroundTowards a Bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and Industrial Strategies
de Besi, M., & McCormick, K. (2015) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su70810461 · Cited by 245 · cited 1×
“Comparing a set of national and international bioeconomy strategies (including those by the German Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture [55], the OECD [6] and the EU [2]), De Besi and McCormick find a common focus on “fostering research and innovation, primarily in the field of biotechnology; promoting collaborati…”
BackgroundBiotechnology and the bioeconomy—Towards inclusive and sustainable industrial development
Lokko, Y., Heijde, M., Schebesta, K., Scholtès, P. R., MONTAGU, M. V., & Giacca, M. (2017) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.005 · Cited by 243
Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework?
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülzl, H. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157 · Cited by 236
The Bio-Economy Concept and Knowledge Base in a Public Goods and Farmer Perspective
Schmid, O., Padel, S., & Levidow, L. (2012) · Bio-based and Applied Economics · doi:10.13128/bae-10770 · Cited by 227
Securing a sustainable biomass supply in a growing bioeconomy
Lewandowski, I. M. (2015) · Global Food Security · doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2015.10.001 · Cited by 213 · cited 1×
“The main constraints for the further development of the bioeconomy sector are impending scarcities of sustainably grown feedstocks for bio-based products due to the insufficient availability and inefficient use of biomass and arable land [31,33].”
BackgroundBioeconomy – an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses?
Pülzl, H., Kleinschmit, D., & Arts, B. J. M. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.920044 · Cited by 204 · cited 1×
“However, the bioeconomy can still be seen as a “chameleon of notions” [50] that adapts repeatedly to changing requirements [52]; the meaning of the bioeconomy “still seems in a flux” [56], maybe as a consequence of its role as a “master narrative” attracting rival visions [57].”
BackgroundDivergent Paradigms of European Agro-Food Innovation
Levidow, L., Birch, K., & Papaioannou, T. (2013) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243912438143 · Cited by 203 · cited 1×
“However, the bioeconomy can still be seen as a “chameleon of notions” [50] that adapts repeatedly to changing requirements [52]; the meaning of the bioeconomy “still seems in a flux” [56], maybe as a consequence of its role as a “master narrative” attracting rival visions [57].”
BackgroundThe origins of the bioeconomy in the European Union.
Patermann, C., & Aguilar, A. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.002 · Cited by 192 · cited 1×
“Picking up that impulse, in combination with the parallel development of a Strategy on Biotechnology in 2002, this was the foundation for the “Knowledge-based Bioeconomy” (KBBE) in 2005 [53].”
BackgroundShades of green: a social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector
Kleinschmit, D., Lindstad, B. H., Thorsen, B. J., Toppinen, A., Roos, A., & Baardsen, S. (2014) · Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.921722 · Cited by 185 · cited 1×
“For a holistic understanding and to avoid negligence of potentials for the bioeconomy, all objectives, interests and challenges of the different perspectives on the bioeconomy should be considered [65].”
BackgroundMustalahti, I. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.132 · Cited by 180 · cited 1×
“Instead, there is a low public awareness of the bioeconomy and a need for inclusion of society in discussing the future pathways of the bioeconomy [151,154].”
BackgroundBell, J., Paula, L., Dodd, T., Németh, S., Nanou, C., Mega, V., & Campos, P. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.010 · Cited by 159 · cited 9×
“As the SDG’s cover nature, economy and society as the three pillars of sustainability, the question remains, how and in what way the bioeconomy can support synergies of diverse sustainability goals from different pillars and thus, help to contribute to as many SDGs as possible.”
BackgroundInfluentialVery tall wooden buildings with cross laminated timber
van de Kuilen, J. G., Ceccotti, A., Xia, Z., & He, M.-J. (2011) · Procedia Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.204 · Cited by 159 · cited 1×
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundHossain, E., & Petrovic, S. (2021) · Renewable Energy Crash Course · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-70049-2_5 · Cited by 158
Present and future biodiversity risks from fossil fuel exploitation
Harfoot, M., Tittensor, D. P., Knight, S. J., Arnell, A. P., Blyth, S., Brooks, S. E., Butchart, S. H. M., Hutton, J. M., Jones, M. I., Kapos, V., et al. (2018) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12448 · Cited by 155 · cited 18×
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialEU agri-innovation policy: two contending visions of the bio-economy
Levidow, L., Birch, K., & Papaioannou, T. (2012) · Critical Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/19460171.2012.659881 · Cited by 151
The Bioeconomy as Political Project
Goven, J., & Pavone, V. (2014) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/0162243914552133 · Cited by 145
Finnish forest policy in the era of bioeconomy: A pathway to sustainability?
Kröger, M., & Raitio, K. (2017) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.12.003 · Cited by 134
Peters, J., & Frondel, M. (2007) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.899088 · Cited by 128
Purkus, A., Hagemann, N., Bedtke, N., & Gawel, E. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.146 · Cited by 118 · cited 2×
“The governance of the bioeconomy as a “learning system” should gradually, but reliably set impulses for a sustainable transition path [145].”
BackgroundSelf-citationBiotechnology for production of fuels, chemicals, and materials from biomass
Wyman, C., & Goodman, B. J. (1993) · Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bf02918976 · Cited by 116 · cited 1×
“Nevertheless, a sustainable long-term oriented bioeconomy policy requires more: the challenge is to integrate bio-based substitutes into existing markets, where equivalent fossil-based products are well established [143].”
BackgroundWhat kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need?
Schütte, G. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003 · Cited by 107 · cited 2×
“Policies should create opportunities for the society to become engaged [47,68,151] as region-specific bottom-up approaches and social innovation matter in developing a sustainable bioeconomy [79,132].”
BackgroundIngrao, C., Bacenetti, J., Bezama, A., Blok, V., Goglio, P., Koukios, E., Lindner, M., Nemecek, T., Siracusa, V., Zabaniotou, A., et al. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.068 · Cited by 103 · cited 1×
“Some authors state promising potentials for the bioeconomy to make a significant contribution to the SDG’s [5,66] and consider the bioeconomy as a valid and reliable way to the transition to equitable, sustainable, post fossil-carbon societies [67,68].”
BackgroundForest bioeconomy - a new scope for sustainability indicators
Wolfslehner, B., Linser, S., Pülzl, H., Bastrup-birk, A., Camia, A., & Marchetti, M. (2016) · doi:10.36333/fs04 · Cited by 95
Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0 · Cited by 91 · cited 1×
“, social issues would arise as, for example, in terms of land and respective land rights [46] or in the production process [63].”
BackgroundWater and food in the bioeconomy: challenges and opportunities for development
Rosegrant, M., Ringler, C., Zhu, T., Tokgoz, S., & Bhandary, P. (2013) · Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1111/agec.12058 · Cited by 90
From a Fossil-Fuel to a Biobased Economy: The Politics of Industrial Biotechnology
Richardson, B. (2012) · doi:10.1068/c10209 · Cited by 90
Lignocellulose‐based Chemical Products and Product Family Trees
Kamm, B., Kamm, M., Schmidt, M., Hirth, T., & Schulze, M. (2008) · doi:10.1002/9783527619849.ch20 · Cited by 83 · cited 1×
“In the future, lignin could also be employed to produce for example fine chemicals, bioplastics [106] or glues [116,117].”
BackgroundEgea, F. J., Torrente, R. G., & Aguilar, A. (2018) · New Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.009 · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“This does not only mean political adjustments in single application fields, such as bio-based chemicals or plastics or textiles, but a coherent approach based on sustainability principles that ensures economic returns, avoid environmental problems and meet socioeconomic expectations [156].”
BackgroundZeug, W., Bezama, A., Moesenfechtel, U., Jähkel, A., & Thrän, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11061511 · Cited by 71 · cited 6×
“However, bioeconomy policies in Germany, the EU and the OECD-countries still focus on the time-honoured understanding of the “knowledge-based bioeconomy” which is predominantly characterized by the substitution of resource inputs and high tech innovations, mainly in the form of biotechnology (e.g., References [2,15]).”
BackgroundInfluentialKallio, A., Solberg, B., Käär, L., & Päivinen, R. (2018) · Forest Policy and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.04.010 · Cited by 69 · cited 1×
“, References [127,128]), also economic “co-benefits” of the bioeconomy, such as employment, rural value creation, economic growth or impulses for technological progress could be forfeited [129].”
BackgroundFritsche, U., & Iriarte, L. (2014) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en7116825 · Cited by 69 · cited 2×
“Despite the fact that there are other levels of governance and other initiatives that may shape the bioeconomy, Fritsche and Iriarte [46] suggest to acknowledge and extend the binding sustainability requirements specifically targeted to biomass for bioenergy in developing a sustainable bioeconomy in order to avoid rei…”
BackgroundForest Carbon Leakage Quantification Methods and Their Suitability for Assessing Leakage in REDD
Henders, S., & Ostwald, M. (2012) · Forests · doi:10.3390/f3010033 · Cited by 68 · cited 18×
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialStappen, F. V., Brose, I., & Schenkel, Y. (2011) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.015 · Cited by 68
Not so sustainable? Images of bioeconomy by future environmental professionals and citizens
Vainio, A., Ovaska, U., & Varho, V. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.290 · Cited by 68 · cited 1×
“However, as the bioeconomy is in the ungrateful role as a straggler of bioenergy, it has got the problem that sustainability, in particular a sustainable renewable resource base, is doubted in public perception [17] so that it is hard to gain credibility and acceptance for a sustainability improvement by means of the…”
BackgroundA Sustainable Bioeconomy: The Green Industrial Revolution
Sillanpää, M., & Ncibi, C. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-55637-6 · Cited by 65
Industry expectations regarding the transition toward a biobased economy
Vandermeulen, V., van der Steen, M., Stevens, C. V., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2012) · Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining · doi:10.1002/bbb.1333 · Cited by 59 · cited 1×
“In a nutshell, as features of bio-based products are similar to fossil-based ones [87], but are offered for higher prices [88,89] and may cause sustainability concerns (cf.”
BackgroundEmergent Imaginaries and Fragmented Policy Frameworks in the Canadian Bio-Economy
Birch, K. (2016) · doi:10.3390/su8101007 · Cited by 52 · cited 1×
“Birch [64] differentiates between four definitions of the bioeconomy: (i) Product definition (bio-based products), (ii) substitution definition (substitution of fossil resources for bio-based ones), (iii) renewable-sustainable definition (critical debate whether renewable = sustainable) and (iv) societal transition de…”
BackgroundUnderstanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study
Stern, T., Ploll, U., Spies, R., Schwarzbauer, P., Hesser, F., & Ranacher, L. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114142 · Cited by 48 · cited 2×
“Instead, there is a low public awareness of the bioeconomy and a need for inclusion of society in discussing the future pathways of the bioeconomy [151,154].”
BackgroundThe price for biofuels sustainability.
Pacini, H., Assunção, L., van Dam, J. V., & Toneto, R. (2013) · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.042 · Cited by 48 · cited 1×
“In a nutshell, as features of bio-based products are similar to fossil-based ones [87], but are offered for higher prices [88,89] and may cause sustainability concerns (cf.”
BackgroundHow effective are the sustainability criteria accompanying the European Union 2020 biofuel targets?
Frank, S., Böttcher, H., Havlík, P., Valin, H., Mosnier, A., Obersteiner, M. H., Schmid, E., & Elbersen, B. S. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01188.x · Cited by 47
Hildebrandt, J., O'Keeffe, S., Bezama, A., & Thrän, D. (2018) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12818 · Cited by 46 · cited 1×
“In this light, incentives for the formation and development of industrial symbiosis in the bioeconomy network can support the integration of different processes and material streams and thus, save costs and mitigate environmental impacts of the production system [157].”
BackgroundThe Political Economy of Fostering a Wood-based Bioeconomy in Germany
Pannicke, N., Gawel, E., Hagemann, N., Purkus, A., & Strunz, S. (2015) · German Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.270182 · Cited by 43 · cited 5×
“For a credible and reliable transition policy, societal acceptance and a broad coalition of interests which support associated policy changes is of crucial importance [71,79,144].”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationDrumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media
Peltomaa, J. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114278 · Cited by 41 · cited 3×
“, German bioeconomy policy and research strategies and those of the German federal states) point to several problems, such as (i) an insufficient consideration of conflicts between environmental and economic policy aims; (ii) open questions on how to effectively safeguard environmental boundaries and global food secur…”
BackgroundPyka, A., & Prettner, K. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_11 · Cited by 41 · cited 4×
“For a credible and reliable transition policy, societal acceptance and a broad coalition of interests which support associated policy changes is of crucial importance [71,79,144].”
BackgroundInfluentialSantarius, T. (2014) · doi:10.14512/gaia.23.2.8 · Cited by 40 · cited 1×
“Moreover, a sustainable development of the bioeconomy requires innovative technical and, above all, political solutions for stimulating a change of consumption patterns and the use of waste and recycling material, taking into account possible rebound effects [91,92].”
BackgroundUnderstanding the systems that characterise the circular economy and the bioeconomy
Bezama, A. (2018) · Waste Management Research · doi:10.1177/0734242x18787954 · Cited by 36
Sustainability or Collapse? An Integrated History and Future of People on Earth
Guerrini, A. (2009) · Annals of Science · doi:10.1080/00033790701786805 · Cited by 34 · cited 1×
“Even if we leave the “sustainability or collapse” narrative [80] behind, environmental changes resulting from human activities will, sooner or later, require transformation and/or reorganisation of economic habits and lifestyles (cf.”
BackgroundThatcher, A. (2014) · doi:10.4122/dtu:2466 · Cited by 31 · cited 1×
“Despite several points of critique [49] and for reasons of straightforwardness and tangibility, we focus on the three pillar model in this paper and do not take the numerous suggested approaches and models for sustainability and sustainable development into further consideration (for an overview in the bioeconomy cont…”
BackgroundLignocelluloses Feedstock Biorefinery as Petrorefinery Substitutes
Cheng, H.-B., & Wang, L. (2013) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/51491 · Cited by 31 · cited 3×
“Wood-based products act as temporary carbon sinks due to the assimilation and storage of carbon in wood and therefore often show better GHG-balances than fossil resource substitutes [55,98].”
BackgroundLeaving the “sustainability or collapse” narrative behind
Strunz, S., Marselle, M. R., & Schröter, M. (2019) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00673-0 · Cited by 26
O'Brien, M., & Bringezu, S. (2017) · doi:10.3390/su9050812 · Cited by 24 · cited 18×
“However, conflicts within this triangle of aims and also with further societal aims soon became obvious, and sparked a broad societal and scientific debate about the sustainability risks involved (see References [27–29] for overviews).”
BackgroundInfluentialSustainability driven new business models in wood construction towards 2030
Toppinen, A., Autio, M., Sauru, M., & Berghäll, S. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_25 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“It shows a growing awareness of current environmental problems and the willingness to counteract, but several existing barriers need to be removed to reach more people to ensure further progress [101,155].”
BackgroundFrom petrochemistry to biotech: a European perspective on the bio-based economy
Landeweerd, L., Surette, M., & van Driel, C. (2011) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2010.0014 · Cited by 20 · cited 1×
“The main constraints for the further development of the bioeconomy sector are impending scarcities of sustainably grown feedstocks for bio-based products due to the insufficient availability and inefficient use of biomass and arable land [31,33].”
BackgroundA Re-Examination of the Structural Diversity of Biobased Activities and Regions across the EU
Philippidis, G., & Sanjuán-López, A. (2018) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su10114325 · Cited by 18 · cited 1×
“Despite high variations between different regions in the EU, bio-based sectors contribute to economic development especially in regions affected by structural changes accelerated by the financial crisis [152].”
BackgroundOne Century of Bioenergy in Germany: Wildcard and Advanced Technology
Pfeiffer, D., & Thrän, D. (2018) · Chemie Ingenieur Technik · doi:10.1002/cite.201800154 · Cited by 15
Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_26 · Cited by 14 · cited 3×
“Markets alone will not suffice to fulfil the enabling and limiting functions of bioeconomy governance because of a number of interacting market failures regarding extraction, processing and use of fossil resources [71,133,134].”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationAdvancements for the Structural Application of Fiber-Reinforced Moulded Wooden Tubes
Wehsener, J., Werner, T., Hartig, J., & Haller, P. (2014) · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7811-5_9 · Cited by 14 · cited 1×
“Selected examples, among others, for innovative or reinvented products and applications are cross-laminated timber products in wooden multi story buildings [107,108], shaped wood in cars [109,110], admixture in concrete [111,112], biocomposites such as wood-plastic composites (WPC) or natural fibre reinforced composit…”
BackgroundHolzeinsatz im Bauwesen - Verwendungsstrukturen nach Gebäuden und GewerkenPreprint
Mantau, U., Döring, P., & Hiller, D. (2013) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.3220/rep_9_2013 · Cited by 13 · cited 1×
“Reference [102]), the use of wood in multi-storey residential buildings is also increasing.”
BackgroundBioökonomie am Scheideweg Industrialisierung von Biomasse oder nachhaltige Produktion
Albrecht, S., Gottschick, M., Schorling, M., & Stirn, S. (2012) · doi:10.14512/gaia.21.1.10 · Cited by 12 · cited 1×
“, German bioeconomy policy and research strategies and those of the German federal states) point to several problems, such as (i) an insufficient consideration of conflicts between environmental and economic policy aims; (ii) open questions on how to effectively safeguard environmental boundaries and global food secur…”
BackgroundBioeconomy Meets the Circular Economy: The RESYNTEX and FORCE Projects
Leal, W. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_29 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“The discourse about a sustainable bioeconomy needs to be linked with expanding the circular flow economy, to reduce pressures on ecosystems that provide primary biomass resources [93].”
BackgroundRanacher, L., Höfferer, K., Lettner, M., Hesser, F., Stern, T., Rauter, R., & Schwarzbauer, P. (2018) · Die Bodenkultur Journal of Land Management Food and Environment · doi:10.2478/boku-2018-0005 · Cited by 11 · cited 1×
“[50,83]), the environmental benefits of bio-based products are even more critical attributes of trust in need of explanations [84,85].”
BackgroundConstructing a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Multi-scalar Perceptions of Sustainability
Banerjee, A., Schelly, C., & Halvorsen, K. E. (2018) · World sustainability series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_19 · Cited by 10 · cited 1×
“Policies should create opportunities for the society to become engaged [47,68,151] as region-specific bottom-up approaches and social innovation matter in developing a sustainable bioeconomy [79,132].”
BackgroundRudolph, K. (2018) · World sustainability series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-73028-8_7 · Cited by 9 · cited 1×
“[160,161]) and to create credibility and acceptance for the bioeconomy.”
BackgroundBiorenewables, the bio-based economy and sustainability
Templer, R., & van der Wielen, L. V. D. (2011) · Interface Focus · doi:10.1098/rsfs.2011.0001 · Cited by 7
Environmental Economics, the Bioeconomy and the Role of Government
Ahlheim, M. (2018) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68152-8_10 · Cited by 6 · cited 1×
“Markets alone will not suffice to fulfil the enabling and limiting functions of bioeconomy governance because of a number of interacting market failures regarding extraction, processing and use of fossil resources [71,133,134].”
BackgroundTransition Strategies: Resource Mobilization Through Merchandisable Feedstock Intermediates
Lamers, P., Searcy, E., & Hess, J. R. (2016) · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-805165-8.00008-2 · Cited by 5 · cited 1×
“, Reference [78]): The “sustainability joker” biotechnology as a high-tech sector may raise huge sustainability risks, especially when upscaling biotechnological processes to an industrial scale as these may absorb any natural resources indifferentiatedly, just like a vacuum cleaner (cf.”
BackgroundOptions for Designing a New Political Framework of the European Biobased Economy
Carus, M., Dammer, L., & Essel, R. (2014) · doi:10.1089/ind.2014.1538 · Cited by 4
Sustainability, polysaccharide science, and bio-economy.
ten Bos, R., & van Dam, J. (2013) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.01.087 · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Ober, S. (2014). Nachhaltigkeit in der Bioökonomie. Zusammenfassung und Thesen als Ergebnis eines Workshops auf Vilm 2013, NABU—Bundesverband Naturschutzbund Deutschland (NABU) e.V.
- 2014, Bioeconomy–A dead end, Rural 21, 3, 34
- Wagner, 2015, Bioökonomie–Über die Pervertierung eines grünen Paradigmas, Zeitschrift für Sozialökonomie (ZfSÖ), 52, 57
- 2014, Bioeconomy and sustainable development–dimensions, Rural 21, 2, 6
- Lewandowski, I. (2018). Bioeconomy Concepts. Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy, Springer. [1st ed.]. · DOI
- European Commission (2005). New Perspectives on the Knowledge-Based Bioeconomy, European Commission. Conference Report.
- Gonzales, N.C. (2016, January 16–17). Regulation of bio based economy. The challenges of the local innovation in governance. Proceedings of the Conference Paper for 5th AIEAA-Conference, The Changing Role of Regulation in the Bio-Based Economy, Bologna, Italy.
- Pietzsch, J. (2017). Bioökonomie für Einsteiger, Springer. [1st ed.].
- Keil, R., Robinet, K., and Todt, A. (2015). Ressourceneffizienz, Ressourcensubstitution und biologische Vielfalt. Ressourcen Schonen–Biologische Vielfalt Erhalten. Chancen und Risiken von Rohstoffsubstitutionen für die Biologische Vielfalt, Oekom. [1st ed.]. · DOI
- Ludwig, 2017, Bauen mit Holz als Beitrag zum Klima-und Ressourcenschutz–Status quo des Rechtsrahmens und Gestaltungsvorschläge, Die öffentliche Verwaltung (DÖV), 23, 985
- Dederich, L. (2015, January 24). Resource Efficient Buildings. Innovative Biobased Products: Opportunities for Substituting Non-Renewable Resources. Proceedings of the Presentation on G7-Alliance on Resource Efficiency, Berlin, Germany.
- Krippner, R. (2004). Untersuchungen zu Einsatzmöglichkeiten von Holzleichtbeton im Bereich von Gebäudefassaden. [Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität München].
- Homami, 2013, Preparation of Wood Plastic Composite from Polyethylene and Bagasse, Middle-East J. Sci. Res., 14, 453
- Carus, M., Eder, A., Dammer, L., Korte, H., Scholz, L., Essel, R., Breitmayer, E., and Barth, M. (2019, May 10). Wood-Plastic Composites (WPC) and Natural Fibre Composites (NFC): European and Global Markets 2012 and Future Trends in Automotive and Construction. WPC/NFC Market Study 2014-10 (Update 2015-06). Nova market study 2015. Available online: https://compositesuk.co.uk/system/files/documents/WPC-NFC-Market-Study-Short-Verson%202015.pdf. · DOI
- Ludwig, 2015, Der Rechtsrahmen für die Bioökonomie in Deutschland, Die Öffentliche Verwaltung (DÖV), 68, 41
- Hagemann, N., Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., and Hauck, J. (2016). Possible futures towards a wood-based bioeconomy: A scenario analysis for Germany. Sustainability, 8. · DOI
- Lewandowski, I. (2018). Sustainable Development and Sustainability Management. Bioeconomy. Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy, Springer. [1st ed.]. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benalaya, I., Alves, G., Lopes, J., & Silva, L. R. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25021322 · Cited by 434
“A semi-crystalline polymer, starch is composed α glycosidic groups: points”
BackgroundCircular Bioeconomy Concepts—A Perspective
Tan, E. C. D., & Lamers, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Sustainability · doi:10.3389/frsus.2021.701509 · Cited by 317
“Similarly, the bioeconomy enables the transition from fossil-based to biomass-based industrial inputs and emphasizes the sustainable use of renewable resources for economic, environmental, and social benefits (Pfau et al., 2014; D’Amato et al., 2018; Gawel et al., 2019).”
Backgroundda Silva, A. S., Espinheira, R. P., Teixeira, R. S. S., de Souza, M. F., Ferreira-Leitão, V. S., & Bon, E. P. S. (2020) · Biotechnology for Biofuels · doi:10.1186/s13068-020-01697-w · Cited by 337
Osman, O., Sgouridis, S. P., & Sleptchenko, A. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121627 · Cited by 178
Wagh, M. S., Sowjanya, S., Nath, P. C., Chakraborty, A., Amrit, R., Mishra, B., Mishra, A. K., & Mohanta, Y. K. (2024) · Process Safety and Environmental Protection · doi:10.1016/j.psep.2024.01.055 · Cited by 223
Metadata
- Authors
- Gawel, E., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N.
- Affiliations
- Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Gawel, Erik
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-05-28
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3005
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2946868949
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 135
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 37.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (031A078A)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Sustainable Development and Environmental Management
- Keywords
- bioeconomy, bioproducts, circular economy, welfare loss, fossil resource substitution, consumer acceptance, bioeconomy governance, climate change mitigation, sustainability conflicts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review