The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model
Open accessAbstract
This paper explores how sustainability can be achieved through open innovation in the current 4th industrial revolution. Through a literature and practice review, we identify micro- and macro-dynamics of open innovation in addition to the dynamic roles of industry, government, university, and society. In particular, the industry continuously adopts open platforms to create and maintain ecosystem innovation. The government’s role has changed from regulation control toward facilitation. Universities have become proactively engaged in multiple areas, from technology transfer to knowledge co-creation. Societies and customers have started to form new concepts, R&D, and commercialization, resulting in a shared economy. Based on the analysis, we propose a conceptual framework to understand open innovation micro- and macro-dynamics with a quadruple-helix model for social, environmental, economic, cultural, policy, and knowledge sustainability. Furthermore, this provides an overview of the special issue, “Sustainability of Economy, Society, and Environment in the 4th Industrial Revolution”, which aims to respond to the 4th industrial revolution in terms of open innovation and cyber-physics from manufacturing to the service industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Teece, D. J. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.640 · Cited by 16,825
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development
Elkington, J. (1994) · California Management Review · doi:10.2307/41165746 · Cited by 3,952
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
(1993) · PubMed · Cited by 3,302
Developing a framework for responsible innovation
Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. (2013) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008 · Cited by 3,184
You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online
Belk, R. (2014) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001 · Cited by 2,951
Open innovation in SMEs: Trends, motives and management challenges
van de Vrande, V., de Jong, J. P. J., Vanhaverbeke, W., & de Rochemont, M. (2009) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2008.10.001 · Cited by 2,184
Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010) · R&D Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9310.2010.00605.x · Cited by 1,690
University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00225.x · Cited by 1,471
Cited by
Identifying Digital Transformation Paths in the Business Model of SMEs during the COVID-19 Pandemic
Priyono, A., Moin, A., & Putri, V. N. A. O. (2020) · Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity · doi:10.3390/joitmc6040104 · Cited by 702
The Culture for Open Innovation Dynamics
Yun, J. J., Zhao, X., Jung, K., & Yigitcanlar, T. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12125076 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yun, J. J., & Liu, Z.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-06-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3301
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2949832423
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 87
- FWCI
- 83.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su11123301
- The paper
- Yun, J. J., & Liu, Z. (2019). Micro- and Macro-Dynamics of Open Innovation with a Quadruple-Helix Model. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123301
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.