CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 134Blockchain Technology Applications and SecurityBlockchain Technology in Education and LearningClimate Change Policy and Economics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Blockchain of Carbon Trading for UN Sustainable Development Goals

Open access
Kim, Seong-Kyu, Huh, Jun-Ho·2020·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su12104021
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Carbon credits should reduce the environmental pollution and carbon emission of the Earth in the future. The market for carbon credits will become a critical issue from 2021, and carbon credits will be applied to systems where individuals can trade. In order for these carbon credits to be traded between individuals, however, a corresponding exchange of carbon credits is needed. Policies, strategies, and technologies are also necessary to measure the trading of carbon credits. This paper aims at making transactions more reliable by applying blockchain technology to measure carbon emission rights. It uses blockchain to verify carbon emissions rights among the UN-SDGs’ (United Nations Sustainable Development Goals’) 17 tasks. In addition, it introduces the necessary dApp. In fact, we can protect against carbon emissions anomalies by using big data and artificial intelligence in mobile cloud environments. Thus, this paper proposes a blockchain-based carbon emission rights verification system to learn proven data further by using the governance system analysis and blockchain mainnet engine to solve these problems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su12104021

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 43 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lee, 2017, Economic and Environmental Assessment of a Renewable Stand.-Alone Energy Supply System Using Multi-objective Optimization, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 55, 332
  2. Bizon, N. Efficiency and Sustainability of the Distributed Renewable Hybrid Power Systems Based on the Energy Internet, Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts. Sustainability, Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/Distributed_Renewable_Hybrid_Power_Systems.
  3. James, 2017, How utilities are using blockchain to modernize the grid, Harv. Bus. Rev., 23, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–134 of 134

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kim, S.-K., & Huh, J.-H.
Affiliations
  • Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
  • Korea Maritime and Ocean University (KR)
Corresponding author
Huh, Jun-Ho
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-14
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
4021
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/su12104021
OpenAlex
W3024710966
Cited by
134
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 1
FWCI
13.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (No. 2017R1C1B5077157)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
Keywords
blockchain, carbon credits, emissions trading, Sustainable Development Goals, decentralized applications, big data, artificial intelligence, mobile cloud computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review