The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Blockchain of Carbon Trading for UN Sustainable Development Goals
Open accessAbstract
Carbon credits should reduce the environmental pollution and carbon emission of the Earth in the future. The market for carbon credits will become a critical issue from 2021, and carbon credits will be applied to systems where individuals can trade. In order for these carbon credits to be traded between individuals, however, a corresponding exchange of carbon credits is needed. Policies, strategies, and technologies are also necessary to measure the trading of carbon credits. This paper aims at making transactions more reliable by applying blockchain technology to measure carbon emission rights. It uses blockchain to verify carbon emissions rights among the UN-SDGs’ (United Nations Sustainable Development Goals’) 17 tasks. In addition, it introduces the necessary dApp. In fact, we can protect against carbon emissions anomalies by using big data and artificial intelligence in mobile cloud environments. Thus, this paper proposes a blockchain-based carbon emission rights verification system to learn proven data further by using the governance system analysis and blockchain mainnet engine to solve these problems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For the latter, in a use case of a developed “blockchain-based carbon emission rights verification system,” AI and Big Data are used to learn proven data [262].”
From Smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [262]
Citations
Cites
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash SystemPreprint
Squarepants, S. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3977007 · Cited by 11,146
Sustainable development goals for people and planet
Griggs, D., Stafford‐Smith, M., Gaffney, O., Rockström, J., Öhman, M. C., Shyamsundar, P., Steffen, W., Glaser, G., Kanie, N., & Noble, I. R. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/495305a · Cited by 2,966
Blockchain technology in the energy sector: a systematic review of challenges and opportunities
Andoni, M., Robu, V., Flynn, D., Abram, S., Geach, D., Jenkins, D., McCallum, P., & Peacock, A. (2019) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2018.10.014 · Cited by 2,426
1 Blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain management objectives
Kshetri, N. (2018) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.12.005 · Cited by 2,149
Policy: Map the interactions between Sustainable Development Goals
Nilsson, M., Griggs, D., & Visbeck, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/534320a · Cited by 2,114
Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home
Dorri, A., Kanhere, S. S., Jurdak, R., & Gauravaram, P. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomw.2017.7917634 · Cited by 1,843
A Systematic Study of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) Interactions
Pradhan, P., Costa, L., Diego Rybski, A., Lucht, W., & Kropp, J. P. (2017) · Earth s Future · doi:10.1002/2017ef000632 · Cited by 1,752
Sustainable Development Goals: A need for relevant indicators
Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2015) · Ecological Indicators · doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003 · Cited by 1,731
Keesstra, S. D., Bouma, J., Wallinga, J., Tittonell, P. A., Smith, P., Cerdà, A., Montanarella, L., Quinton, J. N., Pachepsky, Y. A., van der Putten, W. H., et al. (2016) · SOIL · doi:10.5194/soil-2-111-2016 · Cited by 1,649
Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals
Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010 · Cited by 1,269
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Lee, 2017, Economic and Environmental Assessment of a Renewable Stand.-Alone Energy Supply System Using Multi-objective Optimization, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 55, 332
- Bizon, N. Efficiency and Sustainability of the Distributed Renewable Hybrid Power Systems Based on the Energy Internet, Blockchain Technology and Smart Contracts. Sustainability, Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/special_issues/Distributed_Renewable_Hybrid_Power_Systems.
- James, 2017, How utilities are using blockchain to modernize the grid, Harv. Bus. Rev., 23, 1
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bibri, S. E., Krogstie, J., Kaboli, A., & Alahi, A. (2024) · Environmental Science and Ecotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.ese.2023.100330 · Cited by 536
Parmentola, A., Petrillo, A., Tutore, I., & De Felice, F. (2022) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2882 · Cited by 429
Palomares, I., Martínez-Cámara, E., Montes, R., García-Moral, P., Chiachio, M., Chiachio, J., Alonso, S., Melero, F. J., Molina, D., Fernández, B., et al. (2021) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-021-02264-y · Cited by 276
Blockchain governance in the public sector: A conceptual framework for public management
Tan, E., Mahula, S., & Crompvoets, J. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2021.101625 · Cited by 331
Woo, J., Fatima, R., Kibert, C. J., Newman, R. E., Tian, Y., & Srinivasan, R. S. (2021) · Building and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108199 · Cited by 214
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, S.-K., & Huh, J.-H.
- Affiliations
- Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
- Korea Maritime and Ocean University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Huh, Jun-Ho
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-05-14
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4021
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3024710966
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) (No. 2017R1C1B5077157)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology in Education and Learning
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Keywords
- blockchain, carbon credits, emissions trading, Sustainable Development Goals, decentralized applications, big data, artificial intelligence, mobile cloud computing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
