CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?

Bößner, Stefan, Johnson, Francis X., Shawoo, Zoha·2020·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su13010286
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

With increasing globalisation of bioresource use, expanding trade in bio-based products, and transboundary environmental impacts, distinct international dimensions arise in the governance of the bioeconomy. These international dimensions suggest that—despite bioeconomy strategies being largely national endeavours thus far—increased international cooperation and collaboration on the emerging bioeconomy is warranted. This paper looks at the global environmental governance landscape and investigates which fora, institutions, and processes might support and strengthen the international governance of bioeconomy pathways. The paper focuses on institutions that work in a cross-sectoral manner and is, to our knowledge, a first attempt at this exploration in the bioeconomy literature. Thus, the paper aims at increasing our understanding of how global bioeconomy pathways are governed and which venues of cooperation could play a more important role in the future. Based on a focused literature review, stakeholder engagement and semi-structured interviews with bioeconomy experts, we observe that, while there are many institutions playing a role in global bioeconomy governance, several barriers remain. We propose that regional cooperation might be a promising way forward to address common challenges and opportunities.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su13010286

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research

    Pfau, S., Hagens, J., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. (2014) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su6031222 · Cited by 398 · cited 1×

    “Although some scholars observe a general lack of research on the overall economic impact of transitions to bioeconomies [48,49], it is also clear that many visions of a bioeconomy emphasise economic gains and job creation potential [48].”
    Background

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Jarret, H. (1966). The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth. Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy, Resources for the Future, Johns Hopkins University Press.
  2. Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The Entropy Law and the Economic Process, Harvard University Press. Available online: https://www.hup.harvard.edu/catalog.php?isbn=9780674281653. · DOI
  3. Gowdy, 1998, The Evolution of Georgescu-Roegen’s Bioeconomics, Rev. Soc. Econ., 56, 136, 10.1080/00346769800000016 · DOI
  4. Bugge, M.M., Hansen, T., and Klitkou, A. (2016). What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 8. · DOI
  5. Issa, I., Delbrück, S., and Hamm, U. (2019). Bioeconomy from Experts’ Perspectives–Results of a Global Expert Survey. PLoS ONE, 14. · DOI
  6. Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., and Frör, O. (2017). Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy. Resources, 6. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Lang, 2016, Policy: Five Cornerstones of a Global Bioeconomy, Nature, 535, 221, 10.1038/535221a · DOI
  8. Virgin, I., and Morris, E.J. (2016). Creating Sustainable Bioeconomies: The Bioscience Revolution in Europe and Africa, Routledge. · DOI
  9. Global Bioeconomy Summit (2020, October 12). Conference Report. Available online: https://gbs2018.com/fileadmin/gbs2018/GBS_2018_Report_web.pdf.
  10. Proskurina, 2019, Global Biomass Trade for Energy—Part 1: Statistical and Methodological Considerations, Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining, 13, 358, 10.1002/bbb.1841 · DOI
  11. Nesme, 2018, Global Phosphorus Flows through Agricultural Trade, Glob. Environ. Chang., 50, 133, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.004 · DOI
  12. Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J.J., and Von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the Bioeconomy: A Global Comparative Study of National Bioeconomy Strategies, Center for Development Research University of Bonn. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Meyer, R. (2017). Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates. Sustainability, 9. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Devaney, 2017, Good Governance in the Bioeconomy, EuroChoices, 16, 41, 10.1111/1746-692X.12141 · DOI
  15. Fritsche, 2014, Sustainability Criteria and Indicators for the Bio-Based Economy in Europe: State of Discussion and Way forward, Energies, 7, 6825, 10.3390/en7116825 · DOI
  16. Guerra, F.D., Isailovic, M., Widerberg, O., and Pattberg, P. (2015). Mapping the Institutional Architecture of Global Forest Governance, IMV Institute for Environmental Studies. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277524062_Mapping_the_Institutional_Architecture_of_Global_Forest_Governance.
  17. Pierre, J. (2000). Debating Governance. Authority, Steering and Democracy, Oxford University Press. · DOI
  18. Rhodes, 2007, Understanding Governance: Ten Years on, Organ. Stud., 28, 1243, 10.1177/0170840607076586 · DOI
  19. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997). Understanding Governance. Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Open University Press.
  20. Stoker, 1998, Governance as Theory: Five Propositions, Int. Soc. Sci. J., 50, 17, 10.1111/1468-2451.00106 · DOI
  21. Jordan, 2008, The Governance of Sustainable Development: Taking Stock and Looking Forwards, Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy, 26, 17, 10.1068/cav6 · DOI
  22. Schout, 2005, Coordinated European Governance: Self-Organization or Centrally Steered?, Public Adm., 83, 201, 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00444.x · DOI
  23. Jordan, 2003, ‘New’ Instruments of Environmental Governance: Patterns and Pathways of Change, Environ. Politics, 12, 1, 10.1080/714000665 · DOI
  24. Abbott, 2016, Two Logics of Indirect Governance: Delegation and Orchestration, Br. J. Political Sci., 46, 719, 10.1017/S0007123414000593 · DOI
  25. Ansell, C., and Torfing, J. (2016). Multi-Level Governance. Handbook on Theories of Governance, Edward Elgar Publishing. Available online: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781782548492/9781782548492.00052.xml. · DOI
  26. Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L.B., Betsill, M.M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M.J., Newell, P., Paterson, M., VanDeveer, S.D., and Roger, C. (2014). Transnational Climate Change Governance, Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  27. Dingwerth, 2006, Global Governance as a Perspective on World Politics, Glob. Gov., 12, 185, 10.1163/19426720-01202006 · DOI
  28. Nkuiya, 2020, Stability of International Environmental Agreements under Isoelastic Utility, Resour. Energy Econ., 59, 101128, 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2019.101128 · DOI
  29. Birner, 2017, Designing Global Governance for Agricultural Development and Food Nutrition Secuirty, Rev. Dev. Econ., 21, 265, 10.1111/rode.12261 · DOI
  30. Rulli, 2016, The Water-Land-Food Nexus of First-Generation Biofuels, Sci. Rep., 6, 1, 10.1038/srep22521 · DOI
  31. Rosillo-Calle, F., and Johnson, F.X. (2010). Future Trends in Markets for Food, Feed, Fibre and Fuel. Food versus Fuel: An Informed Introduction, Zed Books. · DOI
  32. Kline, 2017, Reconciling Food Security and Bioenergy: Priorities for Action, Gcb Bioenergy, 9, 557, 10.1111/gcbb.12366 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Englund, O., and Berndes, G. (2016). The Roles of Public and Private Governance in Promoting Sustainable Bioenergy. The Law and Policy of Biofuels, Edward Elgar Publishing. Available online: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/edcoll/9781782544548/9781782544548.00010.xml. · DOI
  34. 2018, What Kind of Innovation Policy Does the Bioeconomy Need?, New Biotechnol., 40, 82, 10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003 · DOI
  35. Hollo, E.J., Kulovesi, K., and Mehling, M. (2013). Alternative Venues of Climate Cooperation: An Institutional Perspective. Climate Change and the Law, Springer. Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice. · DOI
  36. Hermwille, L. (2020). Hardwired towards Transformation? Assessing Global Climate Governance for Power Sector Decarbonization. Earth System Gov., 100054. · DOI
  37. Oberthür, S., Khandekar, G., and Wyns, T. (2020). Global Governance for the Decarbonization of Energy-Intensive Industries: Great Potential Underexploited. Earth Syst. Gov., 100072. · DOI
  38. In’t Veld, R. (2010). Knowledge Governance: Complementing Hierarchies, Networks and Markets?. Knowledge Democracy: Consequences for Science, Politics, and Media, Springer. · DOI
  39. 2018, Governance via Persuasion: Environmental NGOs and the Social Licence to Operate, Environ. Politics, 27, 320, 10.1080/09644016.2017.1373429 · DOI
  40. Viaggi, 2016, Towards an Economics of the Bioeconomy: Four Years Later, Bio-Based Appl. Econ., 5, 101
  41. Kim, 2012, The Role of the G20 in Governing the Climate Change Regime, Int. Environ. Agreem. Politics Law Econ., 12, 361, 10.1007/s10784-012-9173-2 · DOI
  42. Kirton, J.J., and Kokotsis, M.E. (2016). The Global Governance of Climate Change: G7, G20, and UN Leadership, Routledge. · DOI
  43. Charlton, 2006, The Collapse of the Doha Trade Round in Brief, CentrePiece Autumn, 2006, 21
  44. Droege, S., Van Asselt, H., Das, K., and Mehling, M. (2016). The Trade System and Climate Action: Ways forward Under the Paris Agreement, Social Science Research Network. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2864400. · DOI · Paper page
  45. Bougette, 2015, Renewable Energy, Subsidies, and the WTO: Where Has the ‘Green’ Gone?, Energy Econ., 51, 407, 10.1016/j.eneco.2015.07.006 · DOI
  46. Johnson, 2011, Regional-Global Linkages in the Energy-Climate-Development Policy Nexus: The Case of Biofuels in the EU Renewable Energy Directive, Renew. Energy Law Policy Rev., 2, 91
  47. Herwig, A., and Pang, Y. (2019). WTO Rules on Domestic Support for Agriculture and Food Safety: Institutional Adaptation and Institutional Transformation in the Governance of the Bioeconomy. EU Bioeconomy Economics and Policies, Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
  48. Karshenas, 2016, Power, Ideology and Global Development: On the Origins, Evolution and Achievements of UNCTAD, Dev. Chang., 47, 664, 10.1111/dech.12239 · DOI
  49. Woodward, 2004, The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, New Political Econ., 9, 113, 10.1080/1356346042000190411 · DOI
  50. Richard Woodward (2019). The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  51. Diakosavvas, D., and Frezal, C. (2019). Bio-Economy and the Sustainability of the Agriculture and Food System: Opportunities and Policy Challenges, OECD. Available online: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/bio-economy-and-the-sustainability-of-the-agriculture-and-food-system_d0ad045d-en.
  52. Hjerpe, 2010, Functions of COP Side-Events in Climate-Change Governance, Clim. Policy, 10, 167, 10.3763/cpol.2008.0617 · DOI
  53. 2003, Institutional Interaction to Address Greenhouse Gas Emissions from International Transport: ICAO, IMO and the Kyoto Protocol, Clim. Policy, 3, 191, 10.3763/cpol.2003.0327 · DOI
  54. Mee, 2005, The Role of UNEP and UNDP in Multilateral Environmental Agreements, Int. Environ. Agreem. Politics Law Econ., 5, 227, 10.1007/s10784-005-3805-8 · DOI
  55. Turok, 2013, The Green Economy: Incremental Change or Transformation?, Environ. Policy Gov., 23, 209, 10.1002/eet.1614 · DOI
  56. Loiseau, 2016, Green Economy and Related Concepts: An Overview, J. Clean. Prod., 139, 361, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024 · DOI
  57. (2012). Governance and Institutional Flexibility. The Oxford Handbook of Governance, OUP Oxford.
  58. Browne, S. (2011). The United Nations Development Programme and System, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Routledge Global Institutions. · DOI
  59. Bennich, T., and Belyazid, S. (2017). The Route to Sustainability—Prospects and Challenges of the Bio-Based Economy. Sustainability, 9. · DOI
  60. Oh, 2016, Complementary Approaches to Discursive Contestation on the Effects of the IPR Regime on Technology Transfer in the Face of Climate Change, J. Clean. Prod., 128, 168, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.050 · DOI
  61. Heires, 2008, The International Organization for Standardization (ISO), New Political Econ., 13, 357, 10.1080/13563460802302693 · DOI
  62. Gisladottir, 2005, Land Degradation Control and Its Global Environmental Benefits, Land Degrad. Dev., 16, 99, 10.1002/ldr.687 · DOI
  63. Chasek, 2015, Operationalizing Zero Net Land Degradation: The next Stage in International Efforts to Combat Desertification?, J. Arid Environ., 112, 5, 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.05.020 · DOI
  64. Kamau, 2010, The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and Benefit Sharing: What Is New and What Are the Implications for Provider and User Countries and the Scientific Community, Law Environ. Dev. J., 6, 246
  65. Hooghe, 2019, Contested World Order: The Delegitimation of International Governance, Rev. Int. Organ., 14, 731, 10.1007/s11558-018-9334-3 · DOI
  66. Li, 2020, The U.S.–China Trade War: Tariff Data and General Equilibrium Analysis, J. Asian Econ., 69, 101216, 10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101216 · DOI
  67. Carlisle, 2019, Polycentric Systems of Governance: A Theoretical Model for the Commons, Policy Stud. J., 47, 921, 10.1111/psj.12212 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity, Princeton University Press. · DOI
  69. Asheim, 2006, Regional versus Global Cooperation for Climate Control, J. Environ. Econ. Manag., 51, 93, 10.1016/j.jeem.2005.04.004 · DOI
  70. Mattli, 1999, Explaining Regional Integration Outcomes, J. Eur. Public Policy, 6, 1, 10.1080/135017699343775 · DOI
  71. Schneider, 2017, The Political Economy of Regional Integration, Annu. Rev. Political Sci., 20, 229, 10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-023006 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Bößner, S., Johnson, F. X., & Shawoo, Z.
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-12-30
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
286
ISSN
2071-1050
DOI
10.3390/su13010286
Cited by
19
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
Styrelsen för Internationellt Utvecklingssamarbete (na)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review