An Empirical Study of the Impact of Systems Thinking and Simulation on Sustainability Education
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Education for sustainable development (ESD) is considered vital to the success of the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Systems thinking has been identified as a core competency that must be included in ESD. However, systems thinking-orientated ESD learning tools, established methods of the assessment of sustainability skills, and formal trials to demonstrate the effectiveness of such learning tools are all lacking. This research presents a randomised controlled trial (n = 106) to investigate whether an innovative online sustainability learning tool that incorporates two factors, systems thinking and system dynamics simulation, increases the understanding of a specific sustainability problem. A further aim was to investigate whether these factors also support the transfer of knowledge to a second problem with a similar systemic structure. The effects of the two factors were tested separately and in combination using a two-by-two factorial study design. ANOVA and related inferential statistical techniques were used to analyse the effect of the factors on sustainability understanding. Cohen’s d effect sizes were also calculated. Simulation alone was found to increase ESD learning outcomes significantly, and also to support the transfer of skills, although less significantly. Qualitative feedback was also gathered from participants, most of whom reported finding systems thinking and simulation very helpful.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048 · see citing works
Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins
Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0627-5 · Cited by 3,279 · see citing works
Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions
Kraft, M. A. (2020) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x20912798 · Cited by 1,281 · see citing works
Inoculating Against Fake News About COVID-19
van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., & Compton, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.566790 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Naderer, B. (2018) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2018.1452652 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
A complete set of systems thinking skills
Arnold, R. D., & Wade, J. P. (2017) · Insight · doi:10.1002/inst.12159 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Green, C., Molloy, O., & Duggan, J.
- Affiliations
- Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Green, Caroline
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-12-30
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 394
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4226342379
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
- FWCI
- 3.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- University of Galway Research Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Higher Education Authority (Ireland) (None)
- European Union (652643)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and sustainability education
- Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
- Keywords
- systems thinking, system dynamics modeling, sustainability education, online learning tools, knowledge transfer, learning outcomes, Sustainable Development Goals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review