Cited by 39Environmental and sustainability educationSustainability in Higher EducationComplex Systems and Decision Making

An Empirical Study of the Impact of Systems Thinking and Simulation on Sustainability Education

Open access
Green, Caroline, Molloy, Owen, Duggan, Jim·2021·Sustainability

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Education for sustainable development (ESD) is considered vital to the success of the United Nations’ sustainable development goals. Systems thinking has been identified as a core competency that must be included in ESD. However, systems thinking-orientated ESD learning tools, established methods of the assessment of sustainability skills, and formal trials to demonstrate the effectiveness of such learning tools are all lacking. This research presents a randomised controlled trial (n = 106) to investigate whether an innovative online sustainability learning tool that incorporates two factors, systems thinking and system dynamics simulation, increases the understanding of a specific sustainability problem. A further aim was to investigate whether these factors also support the transfer of knowledge to a second problem with a similar systemic structure. The effects of the two factors were tested separately and in combination using a two-by-two factorial study design. ANOVA and related inferential statistical techniques were used to analyse the effect of the factors on sustainability understanding. Cohen’s d effect sizes were also calculated. Simulation alone was found to increase ESD learning outcomes significantly, and also to support the transfer of skills, although less significantly. Qualitative feedback was also gathered from participants, most of whom reported finding systems thinking and simulation very helpful.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su14010394

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Green, C., Molloy, O., & Duggan, J.
Affiliations
Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
Corresponding author
Green, Caroline
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-30
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
394
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226342379
Cited by
39
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4
FWCI
3.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Galway Research Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Higher Education Authority (Ireland) (None)
  • European Union (652643)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental and sustainability education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Sustainability in Higher Education
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
Keywords
systems thinking, system dynamics modeling, sustainability education, online learning tools, knowledge transfer, learning outcomes, Sustainable Development Goals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review