Cited by 27Environmental Quality and PollutionSustainable Design and DevelopmentConstruction Management and Sustainability

Sustainable Development of Eco-Cities: A Bibliometric Review

Open access
Tang, Weiping, Niu, Zhengjia, Wei, Zili, Zhu, Liandong·2022·Sustainability

Abstract

With the increase in the urban population, nearly 70% of future people will live in cities, which will not only bring massive consumption of resources but also cause irreversible damage to the urban ecological environment. Therefore, the study of sustainable development of eco-cities (SDEC) has received wide attention from academics. In this paper, a bibliometric analysis of journal articles on sustainable development of ecological cities using the Web of Science Core Collection database from 1990 to 2021 is conducted to analyze the current status, hotspots, and research trends in this field. The results of this study reveal the evolution of the number of publications, major research disciplines, authors, countries, and institutions in this research field over the last three decades. Regarding research hotspots, SDEC research has focused on cleaner production, sustainable buildings, municipal solid waste management, energy policy, and carbon emissions in China. With the emergence of climate change, carbon emission limitation, and sustainable development requirements, scholars’ research targeting performance analysis and whole life cycle assessment of urban ecosystems will gradually become a mainstream trend. In the future, technological innovation still needs to be strengthened, and we should enhance the research on stakeholders in ecological city construction and study the impact of urban ecological transformation on social, economic, and environmental changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su141710502

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kondratyev, S. A system for ecological and economic assessment. Water Resour. Syst. Hydrol. Risk Manag. Dev. 2003, 278, 327.
  2. Ma, F.; Xi, M. Status and trends of bibliometric. J. Inf. Sci. 1992, 13, 7-17.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tang, W., Niu, Z., Wei, Z., & Zhu, L.
Affiliations
Wuhan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhu, Liandong
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-08-23
Volume
14
Issue
17
Pages
10502
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292871481
Cited by
27
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
2.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Environmental Quality and Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Sustainable Design and Development
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Construction Management and Sustainability
Keywords
sustainable cities, sustainable urban development, urban ecological environment, cleaner production, sustainable construction, municipal solid waste management, energy policy, CO2 emissions, whole life cycle assessment, urban ecosystems, research trends, stakeholder engagement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review