Green Advertising on Social Media: A Systematic Literature Review
Open accessAbstract
Consumer interest in environmental protection has grown in recent decades, alongside a shift in companies’ strategies to embrace a greener way of doing business. Green advertising is rapidly expanding and gaining popularity. With more and more consumers being actively involved in social media searching and purchasing products, social media advertising is transformed into a principal way of communication. Although prior research has addressed green marketing and advertising, their presence in social media has been largely neglected. Based on a systematic review approach, the present study addresses recent trends and developments in green advertising on social media. We used PRISMA for the systematic review of eighty-one articles published between 2011 and 2022. Green advertising content, and greenwashing in particular have attracted significant research interest. Green skepticism and the role of generations are gaining popularity. The descriptive analysis provides article, author, and journal-related information (i.e., citations, year of publications, journals, etc.). This systematic literature review reports the trends in the topic, highlights existing research gaps, and suggests future research avenues. Research and managerial implications are discussed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Consumer reactions to CSR vary even among neighboring nations (e.g., Greece vs. Bulgaria), indicating the necessity of empirical testing before assuming structural equivalence.
“Consumer reactions to CSR vary even among neighboring nations (e.g., Greece vs. Bulgaria), indicating the necessity of empirical testing before assuming structural equivalence (Ktisti et al., 2022;Nemes et al., 2022).”
From Cross-national evidence on influencer-driven green choice: a moderated-mediation model of authenticity, parasocial ties, and greenwashing exposure (2026) · cites this paper as Ktisti et al., 2022
Section 3.3.2 (Greenwashing; page not provided) reports different consumer engagement with a greenwashing-related controversy across four countries, supporting the general point that reactions can vary by country. It does not compare Greece with Bulgaria or discuss empirical tests of structural equivalence. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 99 · Cited by 54
Research works printed but not linked: 91
- Chan, R.Y.K. The Effectiveness of Environmental Advertising: The Role of Claim Type and the Source Country Green Image. Int. J. Advert. 2000, 19, 349-375. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Chang, C.T. Are Guilt Appeals a Panacea in Green Advertising? The Right Formula of Issue Proximity and Environmental Consciousness. Int. J. Advert. 2012, 31, 741-771. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hartmann, P.; Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. Green Advertising Revisited. Int. J. Advert. 2009, 28, 715-739. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kong, Y.; Zhang, L. When Does Green Advertising Work? The Moderating Role of Product Type. J. Mark. Commun. 2014, 20, 197-213. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schuhwerk, M.E.; Lefkoff-Hagius, R. Green or Non-Green? Does Type of Appeal Matter When Advertising a Green Product? J. Advert. 1995, 24, 45-54. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Banerjee, S.; Gulas, C.S.; Iyer, E. Shades of Green: A Multidimensional Analysis of Environmental Advertising. J. Advert. 1995, 24, 21-31. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zinkhan, G.M.; Carlson, L. Green Advertising and the Reluctant Consumer. J. Advert. 1995, 24, 1-6. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kangis, P. Concerns about Green Marketing. Int. J. Wine Mark. 1992, 4, 21-24. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Papadopoulos, I.; Karagouni, G.; Trigkas, M.; Platogianni, E. Green Marketing the Case of Greece in Certified and Sustainably Managed Timber Products. EuroMed J. Bus. 2010, 5, 166-190. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kumar, A.; Moore, D.; Kannan, P.K.; Tyser, R.J.; Smith, R.H. From Social to Sale: The Effects of Firm Generated Content in Social Media on Customer Behavior. J. Mark. 2015, 80, 7-25. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Agarwal, N.D.; Kumar, V.V.R. Three Decades of Green Advertising-A Review of Literature and Bibliometric Analysis. Bench- marking 2020, 28, 1934-1958. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Taylor, C.R.; Carlson, L. The Future of Advertising Research: New Directions and Research Needs. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2021, 29, 51-62. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gusenbauer, M.; Haddaway, N.R. Which Academic Search Systems Are Suitable for Systematic Reviews or Meta-Analyses? Evaluating Retrieval Qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 Other Resources. Res. Synth. Methods 2020, 11, 181-217. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Nyilasy, G.; Gangadharbatla, H.; Paladino, A. Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions. J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 125, 693-707. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Kronrod, A.; Grinstein, A.; Wathieu, L. Go Green! Should Environmental Messages Be So Assertive? J. Mark. 2012, 76, 95-102. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sun, Y.; Wang, S. Understanding Consumers' Intentions to Purchase Green Products in the Social Media Marketing Context. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2020, 32, 860-878. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kong, H.M.; Witmaier, A.; Ko, E. Sustainability and Social Media Communication: How Consumers Respond to Marketing Efforts of Luxury and Non-Luxury Fashion Brands. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 131, 640-651. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Pittman, M.; Oeldorf-Hirsch, A.; Brannan, A. Green Advertising on Social Media: Brand Authenticity Mediates the Effect of Different Appeals on Purchase Intent and Digital Engagement. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2022, 43, 106-121. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Olsen, M.C.; Slotegraaf, R.J.; Chandukala, S.R. Green Claims and Message Frames: How Green New Products Change Brand Attitude. J. Mark. 2014, 78, 119-137. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Minton, E.; Lee, C.; Orth, U.; Kim, C.H.; Kahle, L. Sustainable Marketing and Social Media. J. Advert. 2012, 41, 69-84. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Reilly, A.H.; Hynan, K.A. Corporate Communication, Sustainability, and Social Media: It's Not Easy (Really) Being Green. Bus. Horiz. 2014, 57, 747-758. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chang, H.; Zhang, L.; Xie, G.X. Message Framing in Green Advertising: The Effect of Construal Level and Consumer Environ- mental Concern. Int. J. Advert. 2015, 34, 158-176. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhang, L.; Li, D.; Cao, C.; Huang, S. The Influence of Greenwashing Perception on Green Purchasing Intentions: The Mediating Role of Green Word-of-Mouth and Moderating Role of Green Concern. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 187, 740-750. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kapoor, P.S.; Balaji, M.S.; Jiang, Y. Effectiveness of Sustainability Communication on Social Media: Role of Message Appeal and Message Source. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2021, 33, 949-972. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sahin, S.; Baloglu, S.; Topcuoglu, E. The Influence of Green Message Types on Advertising Effectiveness for Luxury and Budget Hotel Segments. Cornell Hosp. Q. 2020, 61, 443-460. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lee, J.; Cho, M. The (in)Congruency Effects of Message Framing and Image Valence on Consumers' Responses to Green Advertising: Focus on Issue Involvement as a Moderator. J. Mark. Commun. 2021, 28, 617-636. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Tanford, S.; Kim, M.; Kim, E.J. Priming Social Media and Framing Cause-Related Marketing to Promote Sustainable Hotel Choice. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 1762-1781. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Vilasanti da Luz, V.; Mantovani, D.; Nepomuceno, M.V. Matching Green Messages with Brand Positioning to Improve Brand Evaluation. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 119, 25-40. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kang, E.Y.; Sung, Y.H. Luxury and Sustainability: The Role of Message Appeals and Objectivity on Luxury Brands' Green Corporate Social Responsibility. J. Mark. Commun. 2022, 28, 291-312. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kyu Kim, Y.; Yim, M.Y.C.; Kim, E.; Reeves, W. Exploring the Optimized Social Advertising Strategy That Can Generate Consumer Engagement with Green Messages on Social Media. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2020, 15, 30-48. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Pittman, M.; Read, G.L.; Chen, J. Changing Attitudes on Social Media: Effects of Fear and Information in Green Advertising on Non-Green Consumers. J. Curr. Issues Res. Advert. 2021, 42, 175-196. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kao, T.F.; Du, Y.Z. A Study on the Influence of Green Advertising Design and Environmental Emotion on Advertising Effect. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118294. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Martinez-Fiestas, M.; del Jesus, M.I.V.; Sanchez-Fernandez, J.; Montoro-Rios, F. A Psychophysiological Approach for Measuring Response to Messaging: How Consumers Emotionally Process Green Advertising. J. Advert. Res. 2015, 55, 192-205. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sander, F.; Föhl, U.; Walter, N.; Demmer, V. Green or Social? An Analysis of Environmental and Social Sustainability Advertising and Its Impact on Brand Personality, Credibility and Attitude. J. Brand Manag. 2021, 28, 429-445. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Mansoor, M.; Saeed, A.; Rustandi Kartawinata, B.; Naqi Khan, M.K. Derivers of Green Buying Behavior for Organic Skincare Products through an Interplay of Green Brand Evaluation and Green Advertisement. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2022, 13, 328-343. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lim, D.J.; Youn, N.; Eom, H.J. Green Advertising for the Sustainable Luxury Market. Australas. Mark. J. 2021, 29, 288-296. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Baek, T.H.; Kim, S.; Yoon, S.; Choi, Y.K.; Choi, D.; Bang, H. Emojis and Assertive Environmental Messages in Social Media Campaigns. Internet Res. 2022, 32, 988-1002. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Park, S. How Celebrities' Green Messages on Twitter Influence Public Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions to Mitigate Climate Change. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7948. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Anna) Kim, E.; Shoenberger, H.; (Penny) Kwon, E.; Ratneshwar, S. A Narrative Approach for Overcoming the Message Credibility Problem in Green Advertising. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 147, 449-461. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lee, Y.K.; Chang, C.T.; Chen, P.C. What Sells Better in Green Communications: Fear or Hope? It Depends on Whether the Issue Is Global or Local. J. Advert. Res. 2017, 57, 379-396. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Sun, Y.; Luo, B.; Wang, S.; Fang, W. What You See Is Meaningful: Does Green Advertising Change the Intentions of Consumers to Purchase Eco-Labeled Products? Bus Strategy Environ. 2021, 30, 694-704. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Shin, S.; Ki, E.J. Understanding Environmental Tweets of For-Profits and Nonprofits and Their Effects on User Responses. Manag. Decis. 2022, 60, 211-230. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kumar, R.; Tripathi, V. Green Advertising: Examining the Role of Celebrity's Credibility Using SEM Approach. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2022, 23, 440-459. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Wielki, J. Analysis of the Role of Digital Influencers and Their Impact on the Functioning of the Contemporary On-Line Promotional System and Its Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7138. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Pittman, M.; Abell, A. More Trust in Fewer Followers: Diverging Effects of Popularity Metrics and Green Orientation Social Media Influencers. J. Interact. Mark. 2021, 56, 70-82. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Martins, A. Green Marketing and Perceived SME Profitability: The Meditating Effect of Green Purchase Behaviour. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2022, 33, 281-299. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Schüller, D.; Doubravský, K. Fuzzy Similarity Used by Micro-Enterprises in Marketing Communication for Sustainable Develop- ment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5422. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lee, M.T.; Raschke, R.L.; Krishen, A.S. Signaling Green! Firm ESG Signals in an Interconnected Environment That Promote Brand Valuation. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 138, 1-11. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Brydges, T.; Henninger, C.E.; Hanlon, M. Selling Sustainability: Investigating How Swedish Fashion Brands Communicate Sustainability to Consumers. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2022, 18, 357-370. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Zhang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, P. Consumer Attitude towards Sustainability of Fast Fashion Products in the UK. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1646. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kwon, K.; Lee, J. Corporate Social Responsibility Advertising in Social Media: A Content Analysis of the Fashion Industry's CSR Advertising on Instagram. Corp. Commun. 2021, 26, 700-715. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Luo, B.; Sun, Y.; Shen, J.; Xia, L. How Does Green Advertising Skepticism on Social Media Affect Consumer Intention to Purchase Green Products? J. Consum. Behav. 2020, 19, 371-381. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ulusoy, E.; Barretta, P.G. How Green Are You, Really? Consumers' Skepticism toward Brands with Green Claims. J. Glob. Responsib. 2016, 7, 72-83. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Farooq, Y.; Wicaksono, H. Advancing on the Analysis of Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 320, 128927. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Srivastava, V. Exploring Skepticism toward Green Advertising: An ISM Approach. Int. J. Bus. Anal. Intell. 2017, 5, 3.
- Sun, Y.; Xing, J. The Impact of Social Media Information Sharing on the Green Purchase Intention among Generation Z. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6879. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bedard, S.A.N.; Tolmie, C.R. Millennials' Green Consumption Behaviour: Exploring the Role of Social Media. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 1388-1396. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Singh, G.; Pandey, N.; Jha, S. Promotion of Green Products on Facebook: Insights from Millennials. Int. J. Manag. Pract. 2020, 13, 275. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Fernando, A.G.; Suganthi, L.; Sivakumaran, B. If You Blog, Will They Follow? Using Online Media to Set the Agenda for Consumer Concerns on "Greenwashed" Environmental Claims. J. Advert. 2014, 43, 167-180. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Hora, M.; Subramanian, R. Relationship between Positive Environmental Disclosures and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Investigation of the Greenwashing Sin of the Hidden Trade-Off. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 855-868. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Topal, ˙I.; Nart, S.; Akar, C.; Erkollar, A. The Effect of Greenwashing on Online Consumer Engagement: A Comparative Study in France, Germany, Turkey, and the United Kingdom. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020, 29, 465-480. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Nyilasy, G.; Gangadharbatla, H.; Paladino, A. Greenwashing: A Consumer Perspective. Econ. Sociol. 2012, 5, 116.
- Sailer, A.; Wilfing, H.; Straus, E. Greenwashing and Bluewashing in Black Friday-Related Sustainable Fashion Marketing on Instagram. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1494. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Jog, D.; Singhal, D. Greenwashing Understanding Among Indian Consumers and Its Impact on Their Green Consumption. Glob. Bus. Rev. 2020, 1-21. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Lee, H.C.B.; Cruz, J.M.; Shankar, R. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Issues in Supply Chain Competition: Should Greenwashing Be Regulated? Decis. Sci. 2018, 49, 1088-1115. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Neureiter, A.; Matthes, J. Comparing the Effects of Greenwashing Claims in Environmental Airline Advertising: Perceived Greenwashing, Brand Evaluation, and Flight Shame. Int. J. Advert. 2022, 1-27. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Fernandes, J.; Segev, S.; Leopold, J.K. When Consumers Learn to Spot Deception in Advertising: Testing a Literacy Intervention to Combat Greenwashing. Int. J. Advert. 2020, 39, 1115-1149. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Maziriri, E.T. Green Packaging and Green Advertising as Precursors of Competitive Advantage and Business Performance among Manufacturing Small and Medium Enterprises in South Africa. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2020, 7, 1719586. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Garland, J.; Huising, R.; Struben, J. "What If Technology Worked in Harmony with Nature?" Imagining Climate Change through Prius Advertisements. Organization 2013, 20, 679-704. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Knight, H.; Haddoud, M.Y.; Megicks, P. Determinants of Corporate Sustainability Message Sharing on Social Media: A Configura- tion Approach. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2022, 31, 633-647. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Næss, H.E. Corporate Greenfluencing: A Case Study of Sponsorship Activation in Formula E Motorsports. Int. J. Sport. Mark. Spons. 2020, 21, 617-631. [CrossRef] · DOI
- de Simone, L.; Pezoa, M. Urban Shopping Malls and Sustainability Approaches in Chilean Cities: Relations between Environmen- tal Impacts of Buildings and Greenwashing Branding Discourses. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7228. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Yao, J.; Guo, X.; Wang, L.; Jiang, H. Understanding Green Consumption: A Literature Review Based on Factor Analysis and Bibliometric Method. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8324. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Kahraman, A.; Kazanço glu, ˙I. Understanding Consumers' Purchase Intentions toward Natural-Claimed Products: A Qualitative Research in Personal Care Products. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019, 28, 1218-1233. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Rademaker, C.A.; Royne, M.B. Thinking Green: How Marketing Managers Select Media for Consumer Acceptance. J. Bus. Strategy 2018, 39, 30-38. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Bailey, A.A.; Mishra, A.; Tiamiyu, M.F. Green Advertising Receptivity: An Initial Scale Development Process. J. Mark. Commun. 2016, 22, 327-345. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Matthes, J. Uncharted Territory in Research on Environmental Advertising: Toward an Organizing Framework. J. Advert. 2019, 48, 91-101. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gandhi, A.; Sheorey, P. Antecedents of Green Consumer Behaviour: A Study of Consumers in a Developing Country like India. Int. J. Public Sect. Perform. Manag. 2019, 5, 278-292.
- Lee, E.J.; Kwon, G.; Shin, H.J.; Yang, S.; Lee, S.; Suh, M. The Spell of Green: Can Frontal EEG Activations Identify Green Consumers? J. Bus. Ethics 2014, 122, 511-521. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Burucuoglu, M.; Erdogan, E. The Role of Ethical Positions on Responsible Consumption Behaviours and Consumption Values Regarding the Green Products. Glob. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2019, 21, 533-555. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Ghouri, A.M.; Amin, M.; Haq, U.; Haq, M.A. Green Purchase Behavior and Social Practices. Manag. Res. J. 2018, 8, 278-289.
- Brécard, D. Consumer Misperception of Eco-Labels, Green Market Structure and Welfare. J. Regul. Econ. 2017, 51, 340-364. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Stokes, A.; Turri, A.M. Consumer Perceptions of Carbon Labeling in Print Advertising: Hype or Effective Communication Strategy? J. Mark. Commun. 2015, 21, 300-315. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Chi, N.T.K. Understanding the Effects of Eco-Label, Eco-Brand, and Social Media on Green Consumption Intention in Ecotourism Destinations. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 321, 128995. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Gupta, M.; Syed, A.A. Impact of Online Social Media Activities on Marketing of Green Products. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2022, 30, 679-698. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
- Prasad, M.; Mishra, T.; Kalro, A.D.; Bapat, V. Environmental Claims in Indian Print Advertising: An Empirical Study and Policy Recommendation. Soc. Responsib. J. 2017, 13, 473-490. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Park, E.; Kwon, J.; Kim, S.B. Green Marketing Strategies on Online Platforms: A Mixed Approach of Experiment Design and Topic Modeling. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4494. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Iyer, E.; Banerjee, B. Anatomy of Green Advertising. Assoc. Consum. Res. 1993, 20, 494-501.
- Davis, J.J. Consumer Response to Corporate Environmental Advertising. J. Consum. Mark. 1994, 11, 25-37. [CrossRef] · DOI
- Leonidou, C.N.; Skarmeas, D. Gray Shades of Green: Causes and Consequences of Green Skepticism. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 144, 401-415. [CrossRef] 101. Singh, S.; Diamond, S. Social Media Marketing for Dummies, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2012. 102. Liu, S.; Liu, X. Culture and Green Advertising Preference: A Comparative and Critical Discursive Analysis. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1944. [CrossRef] 103. · DOI
- Dutton, J.E.; Dukerich, J.M. Keeping an Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity in Organizational Adaptation. Acad. Manag. J. 1991, 34, 517-554. [CrossRef] 104. Hooghiemstra, R. Corporate Communication and Impression Management-New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 2000, 27, 55-68. [CrossRef] 105. Google Exec Suggests Instagram and TikTok Are Eating into Google's Core Products, Search and Maps|TechCrunch. Available online: https://techcrunch.com/2022/07/12/google-exec-suggests-instagram-and-tiktok-are-eating-into-googles-core- products-search-and-maps/?tpcc=tcplustwitter&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9hYmNuZXdzLmdvLmNvbS8 &guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAGJPR4JtcGApxKYZVpSaSR4K4eyGgBwbduXmU541rR_a8LOu8B8hSO1RpsyNoCvhq6gL8 kNpyO23zKV4AHOeCUhR2WHcP0EpyWRwIf-Ni54jbvJ2oRHbxciSOmCbUiQTq9uPqukbossCMOK0LWWxjgzBoL39Ua4 aUuVVC1aK25yC&fbclid=IwAR1snemwQOCuwGP1SkgcBAeK5fSKRQ31dED-pqQH7CQYixN5Fu8O6QXxRIE (accessed on 25 September 2022). · DOI
- Authors
- Ktisti, E., Hatzithomas, L., & Boutsouki, C.
- Affiliations
- Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
- University of Macedonia (GR)
- Corresponding author
- Ktisti, Evangelia
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-11-03
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 14424
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4308205974
- Cited by
- 54
- References
- 99
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Marketing and Social Media
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Marketing and Advertising Strategies
- Keywords
- green advertising, social media advertising, greenwashing, green skepticism, green marketing, consumer environmental concern, generational differences, sustainable consumption, research trends
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review