Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perceived greenwashing negatively influences consumers' evaluations of ads and brands.
“Strong empirical evidence suggests that, by extension, perceived greenwashing negatively influences consumers' evaluations of ads and brands as well (Newell, Goldsmith, and Banzhaf 1998; Nyilasy, Gangadharbatla, and Paladino 2014)”
From Misleading Consumers with Green Advertising? An Affect–Reason–Involvement Account of Greenwashing Effects in Environmental Advertising (2018) · cites this paper as Nyilasy, Gangadharbatla, and Paladino 2014
Broad claims are made because it is not in the best interest of companies to reduce their low environmental performance or share such details with consumers.
“It is largely found that broad claims are made because it is not in the best interest of companies to reduce their low environmental performance or share such details with consumers [11].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
Perceptions of greenwashing are linked with higher negative evaluations of brands and advertisements.
“previous studies have shown that perceptions of greenwashing are linked with higher negative evaluations of brands and advertisements [10,11]”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
Consumer perceptions of greenwashing products are genuine and factual, and such perception has a significant impact on purchase intent and brand attitude.
“There is evidence that consumer perceptions of greenwashing products are genuine and factual, and such perception has a significant impact on purchase intent and brand attitude [11].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
Some studies reported consumers being highly skeptical of greenwashing and companies that claim but do not use it were found to affect the company's success plans.
“Despite a plethora of research, some studies reported consumers being highly skeptical of greenwashing and companies that claim but do not use it, were found to a ect the company's success plans [11,20,31].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
High environmentalists more often perceive greenwashing as sustainable products.
“On the other hand, the study also found that high environmentalists more often perceive greenwashing as sustainable products, therefore in this regard, the present study contradicts the work of Nyilasy et al. [11], Chan [18], and Brouwer [33].”
From Are You Environmentally Conscious Enough to Differentiate between Greenwashed and Sustainable Items? A Global Consumers Perspective (2020) · cites this paper as [11]
Perception of greenwashing reduces consumer trust and weakens green purchase intention.
“Several studies highlight that the perception of greenwashing reduces consumer trust in companies and their environmental communications, weakening green purchase intention, as consumers are more likely to buy eco-friendly products from companies they perceive as authentic in their sustainability initiatives (Chen and Chang 2013;Nyilasy et al. 2014;Rahman et al. 2015;Gatti et al. 2019).”
From Does Greenwashing Wash Away Gen Z's Green Purchase Intention? (2025) · cites this paper as Nyilasy et al. 2014
When consumers realize that certain green products present misleading information, a reputation for greenwashing is formed, which compels consumers to be more cautious about these products and increases their predisposition to discovering negative information about other brands in the sector.
“When consumers realize that certain green products present misleading information, a reputation for greenwashing is formed, which compels consumers to be more cautious about these products and increases their predisposition to discovering negative information about other brands in the sector (Chen & Chang, 2013a;Nyilasy et al., 2014;Wang et al., 2019).”
From Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter (2023) · cites this paper as Nyilasy et al., 2014
Cites
The Persuasion Knowledge Model: How People Cope with Persuasion Attempts
Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209380 · Cited by 3,811 · cited 2× · see citing works
“complicate attitude change and if skeptical attributions appear, such attributions may hinder positive attitude/ behavior change (Friestad and Wright 1994).”
BackgroundDelmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011) · California Management Review · doi:10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64 · Cited by 3,441 · cited 1× · see citing works
“’’ The greenwashing literature also suggests the possibility of an interaction between advertising and environmental performance (Alves 2009; Delmas and Burbano 2011; Furlow 2010; Gillespie 2008; Greer and Bruno 1996; Paladino and Pandit 2012; Ramus and Montiel 2005; TerraChoice 2010).”
BackgroundBuilding Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs
Ellen, P. S. (2006) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070305284976 · Cited by 1,591 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The lower the perceived fit by consumers, the higher would be the egoistic attributions applied (Ellen et al. 2006; Forehand and Grier 2003).”
BackgroundAre Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?
Mitchell, A. A., & Olson, J. C. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.2307/3150973 · Cited by 1,472 · see citing works
The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Activities on Companies With Bad Reputations
Yoon, Y., Gürhan‐Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9 · Cited by 1,368 · cited 2× · see citing works
“consumer attitudes and intentions (Forehand and Grier 2003; Yoon et al. 2006).”
BackgroundParguel, B., Benoît-Moreau, F., & Larceneux, F. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0901-2 · Cited by 1,024 · see citing works
When Is Honesty the Best Policy? The Effect of Stated Company Intent on Consumer Skepticism
Foreh, M. R., & Grier, S. (2003) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327663jcp1303_15 · Cited by 1,003 · see citing works
The Effect of Misleading Environmental Claims on Consumer Perceptions of Advertisements
Newell, S. J., Goldsmith, R. E., & Banzhaf, E. J. (1998) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.1080/10696679.1998.11501795 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schmuck, D., Matthes, J., & Naderer, B. (2018) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2018.1452652 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Making Green Stuff? Effects of Corporate Greenwashing on Consumers
De Jong, M. D. T., Harkink, K. M., & Barth, S. (2018) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651917729863 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
How Green Trust, Consumer Brand Engagement and Green Word-of-Mouth Mediate Purchasing Intentions
Guerreiro, J., & Pacheco, M. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13147877 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Wielki, J. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12177138 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
The Impact of Green Marketing Strategy on the Firm's Performance in Malaysia
Hasan, Z., & Ali, N. A. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.382 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Sneideriene, A., & Legenzova, R. (2025) · Research in International Business and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102720 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Is Your Product Really Green? A Content Analysis to Reassess Green Advertising
Segev, S., Fernandes, J., & Hong, C. (2016) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1083918 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Urbański, M., & ul Haque, A. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12051786 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter
Apaolaza, V., Policarpo, M. C., Hartmann, P., Paredes, M. R., & D'Souza, C. (2023) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.3335 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Orazi, D. C., & Chan, E. Y. (2020) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-018-4028-6 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Neureiter, A., & Matthes, J. (2023) · International Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/02650487.2022.2076510 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Do Consumers Understand What Different Green Claims Actually Mean? An Experimental Approach in Italy
Iovino, R., Testa, F., & Iraldo, F. (2024) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.2023.2175279 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Does Greenwashing Wash Away Gen Z's Green Purchase Intention?
Di Pillo, F., Palombi, G., & Strazzullo, S. (2025) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.70064 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Poulis, A., Theodoridis, P., & Zacharatos, T. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18010451 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Thao, T. T., Linh, L. T. P., & Cuong, N. Q. (2025) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251385705 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- University of Oregon (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Business Ethics
- Published
- 2013-11-06
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 693-707
- ISSN
- 0167-4544 (ISSN-L)
- 1573-0697
- OpenAlex
- W2006577309
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 151 · 2025: 121 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 26.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Business Ethics (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Keywords
- greenwashing, green advertising, corporate environmental performance, brand attitude, purchase intention, consumer perception, attribution theory, corporate advertising
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review