Cited by 15Teaching and Learning ProgrammingEFL/ESL Teaching and LearningWriting and Handwriting Education

Effects of the Fundamental Concepts of Computational Thinking on Students’ Anxiety and Motivation toward K-12 English Writing

Open access
Peng, Hsi-Hung, Murti, Astrid Tiara, Silitonga, Lusia Maryani, Wu, Ting-Ting·2023·Sustainability

Abstract

Computational thinking (CT) skills are now a key part of everyday life and work, and CT has been incorporated into K-12 curricula worldwide. Combining the fundamental concepts of CT with English writing constitutes an innovative and sustainable learning strategy. However, few academic studies have examined the incorporation of CT into English writing. English writing frequently generates excessive stress and anxiety among students, yet motivation can mitigate the negative effect of anxiety. This study investigated the effects of the fundamental concepts of CT on reducing writing anxiety and increasing motivation toward English writing. A quasi-experimental design was applied, and data were collected from experimental and control groups through writing anxiety and motivation questionnaires. The results indicated that the fundamental concepts of CT exerted a more significant influence on the dimensions of writing anxiety and motivation than did a conventional learning method. In conclusion, the fundamental concepts of CT promoted organized and structured English writing, increased students’ writing motivation, and reduced their writing anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su15075855

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Integrating CT concepts into the learning process increases student motivation towards learning.

    “A similar study investigated the integration of CT concepts into the learning process (Peng et al. 2023).Their results indicated that their instructional strategies effectively increased student motivation towards learning.”

    From Incorporating Computational Thinking Into Virtual Laboratories to Enhance Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Higher‐Order Thinking Skills (2025) · cites this paper as Peng et al. 2023

    Section 5.2 reports that instruction using fundamental CT concepts enhanced students’ writing motivation more than conventional teaching. The citing sentence broadens this finding to motivation toward learning generally; the study’s reported result concerns English writing. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 47

  1. Grabe, W.; Kaplan, R.B. Theory and Practice of Writing: An Applied Linguistic Perspective. Coll. Compos. Commun. 1998, 49, 301. [CrossRef] · DOI
  2. Kao, C.W.; Reynolds, B.L. A Study on the Relationship among Taiwanese College Students' EFL Writing Strategy Use, Writing Ability and Writing Difficulty. Engl. Teach. Learn. 2017, 41, 31-67.
  3. Kırmızı, Ö.; Kırmızı, G.D. An Investigation of L2 Learners' Writing Self-Efficacy, Writing Anxiety and Its Causes at Higher Education in Turkey. Int. J. High. Educ. 2015, 4, 57. [CrossRef] · DOI
  4. Parsazadeh, N.; Cheng, P.-Y.; Wu, T.-T.; Huang, Y.-M. Integrating Computational Thinking Concept Into Digital Storytelling to Improve Learners' Motivation and Performance. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2020, 59, 470-495. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. He, Z.; Wu, X.; Wang, Q.; Huang, C. Developing Eighth-Grade Students' Computational Thinking with Critical Reflection. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11192. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Yadav, A.; Hong, H.; Stephenson, C. Computational Thinking for All: Pedagogical Approaches to Embedding 21st Century Problem Solving in K-12 Classrooms. Techtrends 2016, 60, 565-568. [CrossRef] · DOI
  7. Sabitzer, B.; Demarle-Meusel, H.; Jarnig, M. Computational Thinking through Modeling in Language Lessons. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 17-20 April 2018.
  8. Wing, J.M. Computational Thinking. Commun. ACM 2006, 49, 33-35. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wing, J.M. Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2008, 366, 3717-3725. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  10. Kale, U.; Akcaoglu, M.; Cullen, T.; Goh, D.; Devine, L.; Calvert, N.; Grise, K. Computational What? Relating Computational Thinking to Teaching. Techtrends 2018, 62, 574-584. [CrossRef] · DOI
  11. Lin, J.-M.; Hong, Z.-W.; Song, Z.-K.; Shen, W.-W.; Cheng, W.-K. Improve University Humanities Students' Problem-Solving Ability Through Computational Thinking Training. In Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Virtual Event, 29 November-1 December 2021; Volume 13117 LNCS, pp. 131-143.
  12. Brackmann, C.P.; Román-González, M.; Robles, G.; Moreno-León, J.; Casali, A.; Barone, D. Development of Computational Thinking Skills through Unplugged Activities in Primary School. In Proceedings of the 12th Workshop on Primary and Secondary Computing Education, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, 8 November 2017. [CrossRef] · DOI
  13. Lee, M.; Lee, J. Enhancing computational thinking skills in informatics in secondary education: The case of South Korea. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2021, 69, 2869-2893. [CrossRef] · DOI
  14. Sengupta, P.; Kinnebrew, J.S.; Basu, S.; Biswas, G.; Clark, D. Integrating computational thinking with K-12 science education using agent-based computation: A theoretical framework. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2013, 18, 351-380. [CrossRef] · DOI
  15. Grover, S.; Pea, R. Computational Thinking in K-12: A Review of the State of the Field. Educ. Res. 2013, 42, 38-43. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Jong, M.S.-Y.; Geng, J.; Chai, C.S.; Lin, P.-Y. Development and Predictive Validity of the Computational Thinking Disposition Questionnaire. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4459. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Gok, D.; Bozoglan, H.; Bozoglan, B. Effects of online flipped classroom on foreign language classroom anxiety and reading anxiety. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2021, 1-21. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Ho, M.-C. Exploring Writing Anxiety and Self-Efficacy among EFL Graduate Students in Taiwan. High. Educ. Stud. 2015, 6, 24. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Cheng, Y.-S. A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. J. Second. Lang. Writ. 2004, 13, 313-335. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Liu, H.J. Understanding EFL Undergraduate Anxiety in Relation to Motivation, Autonomy, and Language Proficiency. Electron. J. Foreign Lang. Teach. 2012, 9, 123-139.
  21. Sabti, A.; Rashid, S.; Nimehchisalem, V.; Darmi, R. The Impact of Writing Anxiety, Writing Achievement Motivation, and Writing Self-Efficacy on Writing Performance: A Correlational Study of Iraqi Tertiary EFL Learners. SAGE Open 2019, 9, 1-13. [CrossRef] · DOI
  22. Rahimi, M.; Fathi, J. Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students' writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2021, 35, 2627-2674. [CrossRef] · DOI
  23. Wright, K.L.; Hodges, T.S.; Dismuke, S.; Boedeker, P. Writing Motivation and Middle School: An Examination of Changes in Students' Motivation for Writing. Lit. Res. Instr. 2020, 59, 148-168. [CrossRef] · DOI
  24. Martín, J.; Hameleers, I.; Trujillo-Torres, J.-M.; Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J. A Comparison between Collaborative and Individual Writings in Promoting Motivation and Language Acquisition. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7959. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Kwon, J.; Kim, J. A Study on the Design and Effect of Computational Thinking and Software Education. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2018, 12, 4057-4071. [CrossRef] · DOI
  26. Jacob, S.; Nguyen, H.; Tofel-grehl, C.; Richardson, D.; Warschauer, M. Teaching Computational Thinking to English Learners. NYS Tesol J. 2018, 5, 12-24.
  27. Rottenhofer, M.; Sabitzer, B.; Rankin, T. Developing Computational Thinking Skills Through Modeling in Language Lessons. Open Educ. Stud. 2021, 3, 17-25. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Korkmaz, Ö.; Çakir, R.; Özden, M.Y. A validity and reliability study of the computational thinking scales (CTS). Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 72, 558-569. [CrossRef] · DOI
  29. Tsai, M.-J.; Liang, J.-C.; Lee, S.W.-Y.; Hsu, C.-Y. Structural Validation for the Developmental Model of Computational Thinking. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2021, 60, 56-73. [CrossRef] · DOI
  30. Wright, K.L.; Hodges, T.S.; McTigue, E.M. A validation program for the Self-Beliefs, Writing-Beliefs, and Attitude Survey: A measure of adolescents' motivation toward writing. Assess. Writ. 2018, 39, 64-78. [CrossRef] · DOI
  31. Chien, S.-C. Students' use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan. Asia Pac. J. Educ. 2012, 32, 93-112. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  32. Reynolds, B.L. Helping Taiwanese Graduate Students Help Themselves: Applying Corpora to Industrial Management English as a Foreign Language Academic Reading and Writing. Comput. Sch. 2015, 32, 300-317. [CrossRef] · DOI
  33. Fronza, I.; Gallo, D. Towards Mobile Assisted Language Learning Based on Computational Thinking. In Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Rome, Italy, 26-29 October 2016; Volume 10013 LNCS, pp. 141-150.
  34. Vogel, S.; Hoadley, C.; Ascenzi-Moreno, L.; Menken, K. The Role of Translanguaging in Computational Literacies. In Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Minneapolis, MN, USA, 22 February 2019; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 1164-1170.
  35. Youjun, T.; Xiaomei, M. Computational thinking: A mediation tool and higher-order thinking for linking EFL grammar knowledge with competency. Think. Ski. Creativity 2022, 46, 101143. [CrossRef] · DOI
  36. Liao, Y.-H.; Chen, Y.-L.; Chen, H.-C.; Chang, Y.-L. Infusing creative pedagogy into an English as a foreign language classroom: Learning performance, creativity, and motivation. Think. Ski. Creat. 2018, 29, 213-223. [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Ghaffar, M.A.; Khairallah, M.; Salloum, S. Co-constructed rubrics and assessment for learning: The impact on middle school students' attitudes and writing skills. Assess. Writ. 2020, 45, 100468. [CrossRef] · DOI
  38. Barr, V.; Stephenson, C. Bringing Computational Thinking to K-12: What Is Involved and What Is the Role of the Computer Science Education Community? ACM Inroads 2011, 2, 48-54. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  39. Gardner, R.C. The Role of Attitudes and Motivation. In Social Psychology and Second Language Learning; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 1985.
  40. Lu, D.; Xie, Y. The effects of a critical thinking oriented instructional pattern in a tertiary EFL argumentative writing course. High. Educ. Res. Dev. 2019, 38, 969-984. [CrossRef] · DOI
  41. Yaqi, F.; Xiaoli, Z. The Effect of Collaborative Writing Mode of Thinking Visualization on EFL Writing Anxiety of Junior High School Students. In Proceedings of the International Conference for Media in Education, Palma, Spain, 4-6 July 2022.
  42. Wang, Y.; Luo, X.; Liu, C.-C.; Tu, Y.-F.; Wang, N. An Integrated Automatic Writing Evaluation and SVVR Approach to Improve Students' EFL Writing Performance. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11586. [CrossRef] · DOI
  43. Daly, J.A.; Miller, M.D. The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writing Apprehension. Res. Teach. Engl. 1975, 9, 242-249.
  44. Duijnhouwer, H.; Prins, F.; Stokking, K.M. Feedback providing improvement strategies and reflection on feedback use: Effects on students' writing motivation, process, and performance. Learn. Instr. 2012, 22, 171-184. [CrossRef] · DOI
  45. Wei, M. The Interrelatedness of Affective Factors in EFL Learning: An Examination of Motivational Patterns in Relation to Anxiety in China. Tesl-Ej 2007, 11, n1.
  46. Voogt, J.; Fisser, P.; Good, J.; Mishra, P.; Yadav, A. Computational thinking in compulsory education: Towards an agenda for research and practice. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2015, 20, 715-728. [CrossRef] · DOI
  47. Jin, Y.; Dewaele, J.-M.; MacIntyre, P.D. Reducing anxiety in the foreign language classroom: A positive psychology approach. System 2021, 101, 102604. [CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peng, H.-H., Murti, A. T., Silitonga, L. M., & Wu, T.-T.
Affiliations
  • National Changhua University of Education (TW)
  • National Yunlin University of Science and Technology (TW)
  • Universitas PGRI Semarang (ID)
Corresponding author
Wu, Ting-Ting
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-03-28
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
5855
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361225936
Cited by
15
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology Taiwan (MOST 110-2511-H-224-003-MY3, MOST 111-2628-H-224-001-MY3)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
Keywords
computational thinking, writing anxiety, writing motivation, English writing, K-12 education, writing instruction, structured writing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review