CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 144Technology Adoption and User BehaviourOnline and Blended LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

eLearning Acceptance and Adoption Challenges in Higher Education

Open access
Ahmad, Shakeel, Mohd Noor, Ahmad Shukri, Alwan, Ali A., Gulzar, Yonis, Khan, Wazir Zada, Reegu, Faheem Ahmad·2023·Sustainability
DOI 10.3390/su15076190
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Online learning and technology acceptance has become a highly significant subject in the field of information technology. The challenges of eLearning acceptance and adoption in higher education are complex and multifaceted: it is important to carefully consider the environmental, social, and economic implications of eLearning implementation and to work toward ensuring that eLearning programs are accessible, equitable, and sustainable over the long term. Many theories and models have been proposed over the years to explain individual usage and behavior and measure the degree of acceptance and satisfaction toward technology acceptance and online learning. This study reviews the challenges and limitations of online learning acceptance and adoption for the last ten years (2012–2022). Lack of technical support, awareness, institution readiness, quality online course content, and less information technology skill of faculty members in the early years present challenges. Further, self-efficacy, financial and technology factors, pedagogical learning, socio-economic evolution, digital competence and compatibility, and lack of technological infrastructure have significantly affected the adoption of eLearning in higher education institutions in recent years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su15076190

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 91 references

2 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Rogers, E.M., Arvind, S., and Margaret, M.Q. (2014). An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, Routledge.
  2. Alshehri, M., Steve, D., Thamer, A., and Rayed, A. (2012). The Effects of Website Quality on Adoption of E-Government Service: AnEmpirical Study Applying UTAUT Model Using SEM. arXiv.
  3. Bonk, C.J. (1998). Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, Routledge.
  4. Priyadarshini, 2020, E-readiness of Senior School Learners to Online Learning Transition amid COVID-19 Lockdown, Asian J. Distance Educ., 15, 244

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ahmad, S., Mohd Noor, A. S., Alwan, A. A., Gulzar, Y., Khan, W. Z., & Reegu, F. A.
Affiliations
  • Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY)
  • Department of Computer Science, School of Informatics Applied Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Kuala Terengganu 21300, Malaysia
  • Ramapo College (US)
  • King Faisal University (SA)
  • University of Wah (PK)
  • Jazan University (SA)
Corresponding author
  • Ahmad, Shakeel
  • Gulzar, Yonis
ORCID
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-04-04
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
6190
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3390/su15076190
OpenAlex
W4362558027
Cited by
95
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12
FWCI
24.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (GRANT3,142)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
Keywords
technology acceptance, higher education, online learning, digital competence of teachers, institutional readiness, technical support, online course quality, self-efficacy, digital divide, educational technology infrastructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review