The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
eLearning Acceptance and Adoption Challenges in Higher Education
Open accessAbstract
Online learning and technology acceptance has become a highly significant subject in the field of information technology. The challenges of eLearning acceptance and adoption in higher education are complex and multifaceted: it is important to carefully consider the environmental, social, and economic implications of eLearning implementation and to work toward ensuring that eLearning programs are accessible, equitable, and sustainable over the long term. Many theories and models have been proposed over the years to explain individual usage and behavior and measure the degree of acceptance and satisfaction toward technology acceptance and online learning. This study reviews the challenges and limitations of online learning acceptance and adoption for the last ten years (2012–2022). Lack of technical support, awareness, institution readiness, quality online course content, and less information technology skill of faculty members in the early years present challenges. Further, self-efficacy, financial and technology factors, pedagogical learning, socio-economic evolution, digital competence and compatibility, and lack of technological infrastructure have significantly affected the adoption of eLearning in higher education institutions in recent years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The experience with e-learning and learning management systems in Pakistani universities demonstrates that even advanced technologies face adoption barriers due to institutional inertia and insufficient training (Ahmad, Mohd Noor et al. 2023).”
From AI Adoption in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Institutional Readiness and Challenges (2025) · cites this paper as Ahmad, Mohd Noor et al. 2023
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward A Unified View1
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/30036540 · Cited by 45,035
(1975) · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · Cited by 36,737
User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · Cited by 25,709
A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · Cited by 23,066
Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.6.2.144 · Cited by 8,815
Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions
Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x · Cited by 8,159
Venkatesh, V. (2000) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.11.4.342.11872 · Cited by 6,664
Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace 1
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00945.x · Cited by 6,231
A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996) · Decision Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb00860.x · Cited by 4,068
Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization1
Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249443 · Cited by 3,814
Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: the challenges and opportunities
Adedoyın, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2020.1813180 · Cited by 3,364
The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence
Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x · Cited by 2,971
COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system
Zheng, Y.-Y., Ma, Y.-T., Zhang, J.-Y., & Xie, X. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-020-0360-5 · Cited by 2,970
Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research
Hill, R. J., Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2065853 · Cited by 2,379
Online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Students perspectives
Adnan, M. (2020) · Journal of Pedagogical Sociology and Psychology · doi:10.33902/jpsp.2020261309 · Cited by 2,205
e-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?
Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001 · Cited by 2,042
Viral Load Dynamics and Clinical Disease Severity in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection
Zheng, S., Fan, J., Yu, F., Feng, B., Lou, B., Zou, Q., Xie, G., Lin, S., Wang, R., Yang, X., et al. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m1443 · Cited by 1,479
Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A. M., & Althunibat, A. (2020) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y · Cited by 1,210
Murphy, M. P. A. (2020) · Contemporary Security Policy · doi:10.1080/13523260.2020.1761749 · Cited by 1,032
(2012) · Cited by 852
Factors Affecting Individuals to Adopt Mobile Banking: Empirical Evidence from the Utaut Model
Yu, C. (2012) · Journal of electronic commerce research · Cited by 790
Information technology solutions, challenges, and suggestions for tackling the COVID-19 pandemic
He, W., Zhang, Z., & Li, W. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102287 · Cited by 482
The role of new technologies in the learning process: Moodle as a teaching tool in Physics
Martín-Blas, T., & Serrano-Fernández, A. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.005 · Cited by 444
Chu, H., Hwang, G., Tsai, C., & Tseng, J. C. R. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.004 · Cited by 424
Factors Affecting Students' Academic Performance
Mushtaq, I., & Khan, S. N. (2012) · Global Journal of Management and Business Research · Cited by 348
Computer Anxiety in E-Learning: The Effect of Computer Self-Efficacy
Saadé, R. G., & Kira, D. (2009) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/166 · Cited by 315
Sam, H. K., Othman, A. E. A., & Nordin, Z. S. (2005) · Unimas Institutional Repository (Universiti Malaysia Sarawak) · Cited by 311
COVID‐19 and Management Education: Reflections on Challenges, Opportunities, and Potential Futures
Brammer, S. J., & Clark, T. (2020) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12425 · Cited by 288
Potential ecological risk of hazardous elements in different land-use urban soils of Bangladesh
Islam, M. S., Ahmed, M. K., Habibullah‐Al‐Mamun, M., & Masunaga, S. (2015) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.100 · Cited by 286
The educational integration of digital technologies preCovid-19: Lessons for teacher education
Berrocoso, J. V., Sánchez, M. R. F., Domínguez, F. I. R., & Díaz, M. J. S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256283 · Cited by 281
Extending the TAM to examine the effects of quality features on mobile learning acceptance
Almaiah, M. A., Jalil, M. A., & Man, M. B. (2016) · Journal of Computers in Education · doi:10.1007/s40692-016-0074-1 · Cited by 256
Arrebola, I. A., Ruiz, G. R., Vera, J. G., & Mingorance-Estrada, Á. C. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570017 · Cited by 252
Barriers and Opportunities of E-Learning Implementation in Iraq: A Case of Public Universities
Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. Ø. (2016) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v17i5.2501 · Cited by 232
Tarhini, A., Arachchilage, N. A. G., Masa’deh, R. M. T., & Abbasi, M. S. (2015) · International Journal of Technology Diffusion · doi:10.4018/ijtd.2015100104 · Cited by 225
A conceptual framework highlighting e-learning implementation barriers
Ali, S., Uppal, M. A., & Gulliver, S. R. (2018) · Information Technology and People · doi:10.1108/itp-10-2016-0246 · Cited by 225
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., Alzahrani, A. I., Alfarraj, O., Saged, A. A., & Abdul Rahman, N. S. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2802325 · Cited by 204
Almaiah, M. A., & Alyoussef, I. Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2956349 · Cited by 199
Online learning during COVID-19: Key challenges and suggestions to enhance effectiveness
Heng, K., & Sol, K. (2021) · Cambodian Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.62037/cjer.2021.01.01.02 · Cited by 197
Xiong, H., Yi, S., & Lin, Y. (2020) · INQUIRY The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing · doi:10.1177/0046958020957114 · Cited by 186
Leszczyński, P., Charuta, A., Łaziuk, B., Gałązkowski, R., Wejnarski, A., Roszak, M., & Kołodziejczak, B. (2017) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2017.1337035 · Cited by 169
Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i2.1803 · Cited by 163
Factors affecting the adoption of e-learning in Indonesia: Lesson from Covid-19
Siron, Y., Wibowo, A., & Narmaditya, B. S. (2020) · Journal of Technology and Science Education · doi:10.3926/jotse.1025 · Cited by 153
Al-araibi, A. A. M., Mahrin, M. N. B., & Yusoff, R. C. M. (2019) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-018-9780-9 · Cited by 152
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Education Financing
Al‐Samarrai, S., Gangwar, M., & Gala, P. (2020) · World Bank, Washington, DC eBooks · doi:10.1596/33739 · Cited by 149
The Evolution of Technology Acceptance Theories
Momani, A. M., & Jamous, M. M. (2017) · International Journal on Contemporary Computer Research · Cited by 124
Omotayo, F. O., & Haliru, A. (2019) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2019.102097 · Cited by 117
Ho, N. T. T., Sivapalan, S., Pham, H., Nguyen, L. T. M., Pham, A. T. V., & Dinh, V. (2020) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-08-2020-0164 · Cited by 117
Qiao, P., Zhu, X., Guo, Y., Sun, Y., & Qin, C. L. (2021) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm14040162 · Cited by 113
Cheng, Y., & Yeh, H. (2008) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00857.x · Cited by 112
Oyediran, W. O., Omoare, A. M., Owoyemi, M. A., Adejobi, A. O., & Fasasi, R. B. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05457 · Cited by 112
Lee, I., Olenick, M. A., Boczkowska, M., Franzini‐Armstrong, C., Holzbaur, E. L. F., & Domínguez, R. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03412-8 · Cited by 111
Arya, V. B., Senniappan, S., Demirbilek, H., Alam, S., Flanagan, S. E., Ellard, S., & Hussain, K. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098054 · Cited by 105
Pedagogical Considerations of E-Learning in Education for Development in the Face of COVID-19
Ananga, P. (2020) · International Journal of Technology in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.123 · Cited by 97
Predicting the Impact of COVID-19 on Australian Universities
Thatcher, A., Zhang, M., Todoroski, H., Chau, A., Wang, J., & Liang, G. (2020) · Journal of risk and financial management · doi:10.3390/jrfm13090188 · Cited by 95
Alhumaid, K. F. (2020) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4060120 · Cited by 95
Bousbahi, F., & Al‐Razgan, M. (2015) · The Scientific World JOURNAL · doi:10.1155/2015/375651 · Cited by 92
Mohalik, R., & Sahoo, S. (2020) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3666914 · Cited by 91
A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated Learning About Health
Clark, N. M., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2014) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198114547512 · Cited by 89
Technology Adoption: Issues and Challenges in Information Technology Adoption in Emerging Economies
Ejiaku, S. A. (2014) · Journal of international technology and information management · doi:10.58729/1941-6679.1071 · Cited by 73
Evaluating a learning management system for blended learning in Greek higher education
Kabassi, K., Dragonas, I., Ntouzevic-Pilika, A., Pomonis, T., Papastathopoulos, G., & Vozaitis, Y. (2016) · SpringerPlus · doi:10.1186/s40064-016-1705-8 · Cited by 67
Hernández‐Padilla, J. M., Granero‐Molina, J., Fernández, M. D. R., Dobarrio‐Sanz, I., López‐Rodriguez, M. M., Fernández‐Medina, I. M., Correa‐Casado, M., & Fernández‐Sola, C. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17134653 · Cited by 42
Research Trends and Issues in Educational Technology: A Content Analysis of TOJET (2008-2011).
Bozkaya, M., Aydın, İ. E., & Kumtepe, E. G. (2012) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 40
Potential of social networking sites for distance education student engagement
Lester, J., & Perini, M. (2010) · New Directions for Community Colleges · doi:10.1002/cc.406 · Cited by 36
Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations
Stoffregen, J., Pawlowski, J. Μ., Ras, E., Tobias, E., Šćepanović, S., Fitzpatrick, D., Mehigan, T. J., Steffens, P., Przygoda, C., Schilling, P. E., et al. (2016) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.06.030 · Cited by 35
E-Learning in Time of Covid-19 Pandemic: Challenges & Experiences
Hamdan, M., Jaidin, J. H., Fithriyah, M., & Anshari, M. (2020) · doi:10.1109/econf51404.2020.9385507 · Cited by 35
Factors affecting digital education during COVID-19: A statistical modeling approach
Arora, M., Goyal, L. M., Chintalapudi, N., & Mittal, M. (2020) · International Conference on Computing, Communication and Security (ICCCS) · doi:10.1109/icccs49678.2020.9277370 · Cited by 34
The advantages and challenges of e-learning implementation: The story of a developing nation
Kwofie, B., & Henten, A. (2011) · VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) · Cited by 33
Usability Evaluation by Experts of a Learning Management System
Flores, R. M., & Morales, R. (2015) · IEEE Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnologias del Aprendizaje · doi:10.1109/rita.2015.2486298 · Cited by 32
Diffusion of a collaborative technology cross distance
Mark, G. J., & Poltrock, S. E. (2001) · International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP) · doi:10.1145/500286.500321 · Cited by 31
VIEWS OF FRESHMEN STUDENTS ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE COURSES DELIVERED VIA E-LEARNING
Özüdoğru, F., & Hişmanoğlu, M. (2016) · Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education · doi:10.17718/tojde.18660 · Cited by 30
Naveed, Q. N., Qahmash, A. I., Al‐Razgan, M., Qureshi, K. M., Qureshi, M. N., & Alwan, A. A. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14158973 · Cited by 27
Self-citationRobinson, J. (2010) · University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Institutional Repository on DSpace (University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg) · Cited by 27
Nagunwa, T., & Lwoga, E. T. (2012) · International journal of education and development using information and communication technology · Cited by 25
Current Trends and Challenges of Developing and Evaluating Learning Management Systems
Radwan, N. M. (2014) · International Journal of e-Education e-Business e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.7763/ijeeee.2014.v4.351 · Cited by 23
INVESTIGATING THE E-LEARNING READINESS OF GHANAIAN PARENTS DURING COVID-19
Amanor-Mfoafo, N. K., Akrofi, O., Edonu, K. K., & Dowuona, E. N. (2020) · European Journal of Education Studies · doi:10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3275 · Cited by 22
Australian investment in education: higher education
Hurley, P., & Dyke, N. V. (2020) · Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) · Cited by 19
Obstacles Facing Teachers in Palestine While Implementing E-learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Subaih, R. H. A., Sabbah, S. S., & Al-Duais, R. N. E. (2021) · Asian Social Science · doi:10.5539/ass.v17n4p44 · Cited by 17
Velásquez-Rojas, F., Fajardo, J. E., Zacharías, D., & Laguna, M. F. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0274039 · Cited by 17
Abualkishik, A. Z., Atassi, R., Singh, A., Elhoseny, M., Alwan, A. A., Iqbal, R., & Khelifi, A. (2022) · Mobile Information Systems · doi:10.1155/2022/1595126 · Cited by 15
Self-citationArshad, M., Ahmad, S., & Siddiqui, F. A. (2018) · Information Technologies and Learning Tools · doi:10.33407/itlt.v65i3.2098 · Cited by 13
Self-citationGender-Wise Perception of Students Towards Blended Learning in Higher Education: Pakistan
Soomro, S., Soomro, A. B., Bhatti, T., & Gulzar, Y. (2020) · Scientific Journal of King Faisal University Humanities and Management Sciences · doi:10.37575/h/edu/0019 · Cited by 12
Self-citationHow Usable Are the Learning Management Systems? The Users Have their Say
Althobaiti, M. M., & Mayhew, P. J. (2016) · ICST Transactions on e-Education and e-Learning · doi:10.4108/eai.15-6-2016.151449 · Cited by 9
Koley, M., Saha, S., Arya, J. S., Choubey, G., Ghosh, A., Das, K. D., Ganguly, S., Dey, S., Ghosh, S., Nag, G., et al. (2015) · Focus on Alternative and Complementary Therapies · doi:10.1111/fct.12159 · Cited by 8
Open access in institutions of higher learning in Botswana
Radijeng, K. (2010) · Cited by 7
CLOUD-BASED LEARNING SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING STUDENTS’ PROGRAMMING SKILLS AND SELF-EFFICACY
Salleh, N., Abdullahi, M. S. I., Nordin, A., & Alwan, A. A. (2018) · Journal of Information and Communication Technology · doi:10.32890/jict2018.17.4.2642 · Cited by 7
Self-citationAhmed, S., Ghashem, I. A., Aalsalem, M. Y., & Khan, W. Z. (2017) · International Conference on Computer and Applications (ICCA) · doi:10.1109/comapp.2017.8079745 · Cited by 5
Self-citationAn efficient implementation of thin client technology for e-learning in the Jazan University
Ahmed, S., & Moukali, K. H. (2014) · International Conference on Web and Open Access to Learning (ICWOAL) · doi:10.1109/icwoal.2014.7009242 · Cited by 5
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 91 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Rogers, E.M., Arvind, S., and Margaret, M.Q. (2014). An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research, Routledge.
- Alshehri, M., Steve, D., Thamer, A., and Rayed, A. (2012). The Effects of Website Quality on Adoption of E-Government Service: AnEmpirical Study Applying UTAUT Model Using SEM. arXiv.
- Bonk, C.J. (1998). Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse, Routledge.
- Priyadarshini, 2020, E-readiness of Senior School Learners to Online Learning Transition amid COVID-19 Lockdown, Asian J. Distance Educ., 15, 244
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI‐driven adaptive learning for sustainable educational transformation
Strielkowski, W., Grebennikova, V., Lisovskiy, A., Rakhimova, G., & Vasileva, T. (2025) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.3221 · Cited by 581
Key factors influencing educational technology adoption in higher education: A systematic review
Feng, J., Yu, B., Tan, W. H., Dai, Z., & Li, Z. (2025) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000764 · Cited by 132
Ndibalema, P. M. (2025) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2025.2452085 · Cited by 130
An analysis of E-learning system challenges in engineering education: an empirical study
Matarneh, S. T., AlQaraleh, L., Alkhrissat, T., & Abdel-Jaber, M. (2024) · Cogent Education · doi:10.1080/2331186x.2024.2445967 · Cited by 37
Sasongko, A. T., Ekhsan, M., & Fatchan, M. (2025) · Telematics and Informatics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.teler.2025.100192 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahmad, S., Mohd Noor, A. S., Alwan, A. A., Gulzar, Y., Khan, W. Z., & Reegu, F. A.
- Affiliations
- Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (MY)
- Department of Computer Science, School of Informatics Applied Mathematics, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Kuala Terengganu 21300, Malaysia
- Ramapo College (US)
- King Faisal University (SA)
- University of Wah (PK)
- Jazan University (SA)
- Corresponding author
- Ahmad, Shakeel
- Gulzar, Yonis
- ORCID
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-04-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 6190
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4362558027
- Cited by
- 95
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 12
- FWCI
- 24.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Deanship of Scientific Research, Vice Presidency for Graduate Studies and Scientific Research, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia (GRANT3,142)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
- Keywords
- technology acceptance, higher education, online learning, digital competence of teachers, institutional readiness, technical support, online course quality, self-efficacy, digital divide, educational technology infrastructure
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review