Cited by 61Employee Performance and LeadershipCollaboration in agile enterprisesJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

The Effect of Transactional Leadership on Organizational Agility in Tourism and Hospitality Businesses: The Mediating Roles of Organizational Trust and Ambidexterity

Open access
Khairy, Hazem Ahmed, Baquero, Asier, Al-Romeedy, Bassam Samir·2023·Sustainability

Abstract

The tourism and hospitality industry is dynamic, so it demands agility to gain a competitive edge. This paper aims to examine the effect of transactional leadership on organizational agility in the tourism and hospitality industry. It also investigates the roles of organizational trust and ambidexterity as mediators by adopting the resource-based view (RBV). This study’s data are collected from the full-time employees working in category (A) travel agencies and five-star hotels operating in Egypt. The PLS-SEM approach was used to analyze 532 valid responses using WarpPLS 7.0. The findings showed that there is a positive relationship between transactional leadership and organizational agility, as well as positive relationships between transactional leadership with organizational trust and ambidexterity. Organizational trust and ambidexterity were also found to have positive relationships with organizational agility. Moreover, the findings revealed that organizational trust and ambidexterity play a mediating role between transactional leadership and organizational agility. According to the results, setting specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals is a key aspect of transactional leadership. Managers can collaborate with employees to set goals aligned with organizational agility, encouraging them to proactively identify and seize opportunities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/su151914337

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reward systems play a key role in motivating employees and running an organisation.

    “In both government and non-governmental establishments, reward systems play a key role in motivating employees and running an organisation.”

    From Rewards and Employee Performance in Government Agencies: Evidence from Kampala Capital City Authority (KCCA), Uganda (2026) · cites this paper as Khairy et al., 2023

    Section 2.1 says contingent rewards motivate employees and help leaders maintain stability and established procedures; Section 7 describes rewards as a way to encourage organisational agility. The paper concerns tourism and hospitality businesses, so it does not establish the claim across both government and non-government establishments. Page numbers were not supplied. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 78 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Worley, C.G.; Williams, T.D.; Lawler, E.E., III. The Agility Factor: Building Adaptable Organizations for Superior Performance; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014.
  2. Aftab, S.; Saleem, I.; Belwal, R. Levelling up or down: Leader's Strategies to Encounter Downward Envy in Family-Owned Software Houses. Asia-Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2022. ahead-of-print. [CrossRef] · DOI
  3. Kalsoom, Z.; Khan, M.A.; Zubair, D.S.S. Impact of Transactional Leadership and Transformational Leadership on Employee Performance: A Case of FMCG Industry of Pakistan. Ind. Eng. Lett. 2018, 8, 23-30.
  4. Gong, C.; Ribiere, V. Understanding the Role of Organizational Agility in the Context of Digital Transformation: An Integrative Literature Review. VINE J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. Syst. 2023. [CrossRef] · DOI
  5. Subramaniam, T.S. Examining Agile Leadership Style on Organizational Performance through the Mediation of Organizational Culture: A Case Study on Professional Bodies in Malaysia. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wales Trinity Saint David, Lampeter, UK, 2021.
  6. Ghadampour, E.; Zandkarimi, M. The Study Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Organizational Agility with Role Knowledge Sharing of the Mediator. Sch. Adm. 2019, 7, 212-235.
  7. Raduan, C.R.; Jegak, U.; Haslinda, A.; Alimin, I.I. Management, Strategic Management Theories and the Linkage with Organiza- tional Competitive Advantage from the Resource-Based View. Eur. J. Soc. Sci. 2009, 11, 402-418.
  8. Solaja, O.M.; Ogunola, A.A. Leadership Style and Multigenerational Workforce: A Call for Workplace Agility in Nigerian Public Organizations. Leadership 2016, 21, 46-56.
  9. Patterson, T.L. An Exploratory Study of Leader Development for Army Officers. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northcentral University, Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 2017.
  10. Akkaya, B.; Tabak, A. The Link between Organizational Agility and Leadership: A Research in Science Parks. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 2020, 19, 1-17.
  11. Odumeru, J.A.; Ogbonna, I.G. Transformational vs. Transactional Leadership Theories: Evidence in Literature. Int. Rev. Manag. Bus. Res. 2013, 2, 355.
  12. Sundi, K. Effect of Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership on Employee Performance of Konawe Education Department at Southeast Sulawesi Province. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent. 2013, 2, 50-58.
  13. Prange, C.; Heracleous, L. (Eds.) Agility. X: How Organizations Thrive in Unpredictable Times; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018.
  14. Kumkale, ˙I. Field Study to Evaluate the Effect of Strategic Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity on Organizational Agility. In Organizational Mastery: The Impact of Strategic Leadership and Organizational Ambidexterity on Organizational Agility; Springer Nature Singapore: Singapore, 2022.
  15. Udin, U.D.I.N.; Dananjoyo, R.; Isalman, I. Transactional Leadership and Innovative Work Behavior: Testing the Mediation Role of Knowledge Sharing in Distribution Market. J. Distrib. Sci. 2022, 20, 41-53.
  16. Cochran, W.G. Sampling Techniques, 2nd ed.; John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1963.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khairy, H. A., Baquero, A., & Al-Romeedy, B. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Sadat City (EG)
  • Universidad Internacional de La Rioja (ES)
  • Tourism Studies Department, Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, University of Sadat City, Sadat City 32897, Egypt
Corresponding author
Khairy, Hazem Ahmed
Venue
Sustainability
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-09-28
Volume
15
Issue
19
Pages
14337
ISSN
2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387140342
Cited by
61
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 2
FWCI
17.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sustainability (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Re-Unir (International University of La Rioja) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Collaboration in agile enterprises
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
transactional leadership, organizational agility, organizational trust, organizational ambidexterity, tourism and hospitality industry, travel agencies, five-star hotels, SMART goals, resource-based view, mediating effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review