The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participatory System Dynamics Modeling for Sustainable Environmental Management: Observations from Four Cases
Open accessAbstract
Sustainable environmental management requires a decision support approach that accounts for dynamic connections between social and ecological systems, integrates stakeholder deliberation with scientific analysis, incorporates diverse stakeholder knowledge, and fosters relationships among stakeholders that can accommodate changing information and changing social and environmental conditions. Participatory system dynamics modeling provides such a framework. It supports stakeholder learning about the system and the perspectives of other stakeholders, and can help build social capital among stakeholders. Four cases of participatory system dynamics modeling, which range from no to full participant involvement in model development, support the idea that greater social capital development results from greater participation in model development, but also suggest that even the simplest use of simulation models in a group fosters stakeholder learning about the system through surprise and discovery. To maximize the learning value of simulation models, it is important to allow enough time for debriefing the “aha!” moments that lead to curiosity about system behavior. To maximize social capital development, it is important to build enough time into the problem structuring and model conceptualization phases for stakeholders to articulate their mental models and examine those of other participants.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Beddoe, R., Costanza, R., Farley, J., Garza, E., Kent, J., Kubiszewski, I., Martinez, L., McCowen, T., Murphy, K., Myers, N., et al. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0812570106 · Cited by 399
Deliberative Methods for Understanding Environmental Systems
STERN, P. C. (2005) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2005)055[0976:dmfues]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 78
Cited by
Tools and methods in participatory modeling: Selecting the right tool for the job
Voinov, A., Jenni, K., Gray, S., Kolagani, N., Glynn, P. D., Bommel, P., Prell, C., Zellner, M., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., et al. (2018) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.028 · Cited by 428
Collaborative modelling or participatory modelling? A framework for water resources management
Basco-Carrera, L., Warren, A., van Beek, E., Jonoski, A., & Giardino, A. (2017) · Environmental Modelling & Software · doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.01.014 · Cited by 295
Gray, S., Voinov, A., Paolisso, M., Jordan, R., BenDor, T., Bommel, P., Glynn, P., Hedelin, B., Hubacek, K., Introne, J., et al. (2018) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1627 · Cited by 106
An Empirical Study of the Impact of Systems Thinking and Simulation on Sustainability Education
Green, C., Molloy, O., & Duggan, J. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su14010394 · Cited by 39
An Empirical Study of the Impact of Systems Thinking and Simulation on Sustainability Education
(2021) · doi:10.20944/preprints202111.0299.v1 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Stave, K.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2010-09-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2762-2784
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2110877356
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participatory System Dynamics Modeling for Sustainable Environmental Management: Observations from Four Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su2092762
- The paper
- Stave, K. (2010). Participatory System Dynamics Modeling for Sustainable Environmental Management: Observations from Four Cases. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2092762
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.