The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment
Open accessAbstract
The need for integrated methodological framework for sustainability assessment has been widely discussed and is urgent due to increasingly complex environmental system problems. These problems have impacts on ecosystems and human well-being which represent a threat to economic performance of countries and corporations. Integrated assessment crosses issues; spans spatial and temporal scales; looks forward and backward; and incorporates multi-stakeholder inputs. This study aims to develop an integrated methodology by capitalizing the complementary strengths of different methods used by industrial ecologists and biophysical economists. The computational methodology proposed here is systems perspective, integrative, and holistic approach for sustainability assessment which attempts to link basic science and technology to policy formulation. The framework adopts life cycle thinking methods—LCA, LCC, and SLCA; stakeholders analysis supported by multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); and dynamic system modelling. Following Pareto principle, the critical sustainability criteria, indicators and metrics (i.e., hotspots) can be identified and further modelled using system dynamics or agent based modelling and improved by data envelopment analysis (DEA) and sustainability network theory (SNT). The framework is being applied to development of biofuel supply chain networks. The framework can provide new ways of integrating knowledge across the divides between social and natural sciences as well as between critical and problem-solving research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8 · Cited by 29,767
The Analytic Hierarchy Process
SAATY, T. L., & KEARNS, K. P. (1985) · Analytical Planning · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-032599-6.50008-8 · Cited by 15,357
Optimization by the Analytic Hierarchy Process
Saaty, T. L. (1979) · doi:10.21236/ada214804 · Cited by 4,466
Recent developments in life cycle assessment
Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.06.018 · Cited by 3,444
Brans, J. P., & Vincke, P. (1985) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647 · Cited by 2,801
Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards
Guinee, J. B. (2002) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/bf02978897 · Cited by 2,765
Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making
Wang, J.-J., Jing, Y.-Y., Zhang, C.-F., & Zhao, J.-H. (2009) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2009.06.021 · Cited by 2,346
The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration
Fukuyama, F., Axelrod, R., & Jervis, R. (1998) · Foreign Affairs · doi:10.2307/20048800 · Cited by 2,189
Perlack, R. D. (2005) · doi:10.2172/885984 · Cited by 2,085
Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning—A review
Pohekar, S. D., & Ramachandran, M. (2004) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2003.12.007 · Cited by 1,938
Cited by
Lozano, R., Merrill, M., Sammalisto, K., Ceulemans, K., & Lozano, F. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101889 · Cited by 904
Social life cycle assessment of palm oil biodiesel: a case study in Jambi Province of Indonesia
Manik, Y., Leahy, J., & Halog, A. (2013) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-013-0581-5 · Cited by 209
Self-citationMiah, J. H., Koh, S. C. L., & Stone, D. (2017) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.187 · Cited by 160
Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.146 · Cited by 135
Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Halog, A., & Manik, Y.
- Venue
- Sustainability
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2011-02-23
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 469-499
- ISSN
- 2071-1050 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075441770
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 9.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/su3020469
- The paper
- Halog, A., & Manik, Y. (2011). Advancing Integrated Systems Modelling Framework for Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su3020469
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.